13:00:11 #startmeeting senlin 13:00:12 Meeting started Tue Mar 21 13:00:11 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is Qiming. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:00:13 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 13:00:15 The meeting name has been set to 'senlin' 13:00:44 hi, evening 13:00:48 hi 13:00:51 o/ 13:00:56 hi 13:01:28 agenda posted, please add if you have things to talk about 13:01:35 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/SenlinAgenda#Weekly_Senlin_.28Clustering.29_meeting 13:02:23 le'ts get started 13:02:30 #topic pike work items 13:02:41 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/senlin-pike-workitems 13:03:02 api test for profile-only is in now 13:03:55 we need to revisit if all api changes since microversion 1.2 have been properly tested 13:04:01 so I'm leaving that item there 13:04:15 next, feature rich nova server 13:04:25 no progress yet 13:04:32 will try to start it this week 13:04:38 okay, sounds great 13:04:48 As we talked before 13:04:49 we have some very limited versioning support today 13:05:11 in the long run, maybe we should replace the "schema" module with versioned objects 13:05:21 I'm about to say I'm going to use versioned schema for it.. 13:05:35 we may need to derive some subclasses from base VersionedObject for this purpose 13:05:41 cool 13:05:57 But I haven't tested it yet... 13:06:12 hi, Qiming, so the member of the derived versioned object will still be versioned object? 13:06:34 will spend some time on it 13:06:44 we don't have to do nested versioned objects 13:06:59 e.g. a versioned obj for nova server profile will be consist of a set of versioned object of image/net/storage, etc. 13:07:17 the goal is simple, make sure any changes of the spec would require a version bump 13:07:42 ok 13:07:51 if we manage nested objects, there will be two or more layers of objects to be managed in versions 13:07:56 too boring 13:08:20 yes, more than one layers of oversioned obj will be there if so 13:08:20 next, engine improvement, wrt CLUSTER_CHECK 13:08:41 hi,QiMing 13:08:47 yes, yanyanhu, and each of them will have to be versioned 13:09:03 No update this week 13:09:23 Attend a meetup in NanJing 13:09:31 alright, would you give an update on your talk during open discussion? 13:09:51 OK 13:10:01 next item is about node adopt 13:10:06 And will have a article for the meetup 13:10:26 XueFeng, that's great :) 13:10:26 just added some resources to SDK, for getting environment, files and template back 13:10:39 senlin side driver patches are ready for review 13:11:07 em... both are in now: https://review.openstack.org/447001 and https://review.openstack.org/446866 13:12:18 review.openstack.org is slow .... 13:12:45 yes, it is... 13:13:01 actually, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/447001/ should not get in 13:13:11 because there is another patch at sdk side to be merged 13:13:41 and we will need to wait for another release from sdk to get the whole thing work 13:13:52 but anyway, cannot wait for so long 13:14:01 OK 13:14:15 I think we are ready to move forward with node adoption 13:14:54 Yes 13:15:09 It's an important feature in senlin 13:15:14 next is from ruijie 13:15:47 I cannot open etherpad .,.. 13:16:06 the main requirement is about doing an optional health check before doing scaling 13:16:08 right? 13:16:12 https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/pike-senlin-desired-health-check 13:16:18 yes Qiming. 13:16:36 We do desired_capacity check in scaling proces 13:16:37 I'm okay with this feature 13:16:56 desired capacity is expressed by a user's request 13:17:16 that is how we call it "desired" 13:17:58 looking at your story, I'm kind of feeling it is making things too complicated 13:18:17 em .. Qiming, you mean which part 13:18:34 calculate new desired capacity based on old desired_capacity 13:18:42 the old value is never reliable 13:18:59 it might have been broken since last time you scaled your cluster 13:19:06 I thought that is the mean of "desired" .. 13:19:25 a more reasonable process is to do your operations based on current scale 13:19:48 e.g, current desired=3, num of nodes=3, we do scale out to 5. then the desired is 5 13:19:59 we have a long debate several months ago 13:20:39 when you do scaling, you express your expectation in parameters, senlin will compute your "desired capacity" 13:20:44 hi, Ruijie, I think the basic idea is senlin won't maintain the "desired" capacity. In opposite, users will maintain/remind this value in their own mind :) 13:20:53 but if this process failed, say we only have 4 nodes, but the desired is still 5 ... I want 5 nodes in the cluster but not 4.. 13:21:05 but this computation has nothing to do with the curren value of "desired_capacity" 13:21:23 this is especially true when you do auto-scaling 13:21:34 users can observe and know what is current size of cluster, then they scale their clusters based on the observation result 13:21:50 the metrics that trigger an auto-scaling is the active number of nodes, not the current "desired capacity" 13:21:56 yanyanhu, you mean the "desired" is invisiable to user ? 13:22:14 desired is calculated from your last scaling operation 13:22:20 Ruijie, I mean senlin won't be responsible to maintain the "desired" value 13:22:20 that was your "desire" 13:22:24 yep 13:22:40 its users' "desire" :) 13:22:55 when senlin adjusts cluster scale, it is always based on the "reality", the current size of the cluster 13:23:07 so they always know this value and they don't need to rely on senlin to keep it 13:23:22 if you want to make sure the current size (cached in cluster's nodes list) is correct, you can still do a health check 13:23:27 there is no conflict ther 13:24:08 okay, I think I got it .. we show the desired and current size, let user decide what to do 13:24:19 yes 13:24:25 Qiming, maybe we should consider to rename the property of "desired_capacity"... 13:24:29 that is how a user should be doing 13:24:41 and that is actually what a monitoring software doing 13:24:42 Here is an problem we met. 13:25:14 yanyanhu, suggestions on renaming? 13:25:23 current is 3, scale to 5, but 1 failed. 13:25:35 Qiming, yes. Or we keep it in current status but add some explanation on it 13:25:55 then to make the process corrct, I need to scale out 1 again 13:26:12 Ruijie, in that case, the current size is 4, your last desired_capacity is 5 13:26:18 And now we are using receiver to do scale, that means, I need to create another receiver to scale out 1 .. 13:26:21 you can see that from openstack cluster show 13:26:42 we don't do convergence 13:27:36 uses should check the current size of a cluster after an operation and explicitly tell us what to do next, via another service request 13:28:05 yes Qiming, I understand, I mean if we based on old desired capacity, senlin will correct this process, then user will be free ...:) 13:28:23 no, it may be too dangerous 13:28:30 we actually don't know what happened 13:28:40 maybe the server has run out of resources 13:29:04 keep on trying creating a new node is only a waste of time 13:29:46 your other point, as I read from etherpad, is to ensure cluster recover to its desired capacity 13:29:49 that makes sense to me 13:30:01 if only we make the behavior configurable 13:30:09 sorry just dropped... 13:30:17 your other point, as I read from etherpad, is to ensure cluster recover to its desired capacity 13:30:17 that makes sense to me 13:30:17 if only we make the behavior configurable 13:31:02 I'd suggest we make the service robust and predictable first 13:31:15 yes Qiming 13:31:16 instead of trying to make it a smart robot 13:31:29 to correct the failure scaling when do scaling action again 13:31:42 especially be cautious when we teach senlin to guess what users meant 13:31:55 Ruijie__, that makes perfect sense to me 13:32:21 that is what the English word "recover" means, IMO 13:32:49 thx for bringing up these topics 13:32:52 another option is: we make scale as scale, and to do this process in recovery .. 13:33:05 yes 13:33:34 make the service dumb and stable 13:33:38 then all scaling based on current number of nodes, cluster recover to correct all failures 13:33:59 yes, that is what I was suggesting 13:34:14 don't mix scaling with recovery instead 13:34:51 okay Qiming, that makes sense. And shell we do health check in scaling process, to make it configurable 13:35:08 yes, that sounds reasonable too 13:35:19 adding line 20 to etherpad just now 13:35:48 done? 13:35:50 okay, Qiming, I will modify the draft :) 13:35:53 yes Qiming 13:36:11 okay, you may want to create a BP for this 13:36:22 or maybe two BPs? 13:36:29 moving on 13:36:35 next is about RDO packaging 13:36:48 Rdo is in debug 13:36:54 okay 13:37:06 health mgmt 13:37:17 I'm not aware of any progress there 13:37:34 senlinclient functional test 13:37:48 no progress there either? 13:37:58 Yes, will do it 13:38:13 alright 13:38:31 LB policy improvement 13:38:43 yet waiting to see a patch on that 13:38:50 let me see 13:39:02 em, that's all on the list 13:39:26 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/447267/ 13:40:12 website is so slow 13:40:52 Hi,ruijie 13:40:58 yes XueFeng 13:40:59 okay, Ruijie__ , will jump onto that 13:41:24 it seems its the same with base. 13:41:26 cool, the link is in etherpad now 13:41:44 yes XueFeng, just removed one parameter. 13:41:47 Don't get the point 13:41:57 I am still thinking how to process the data in a better way 13:42:18 So will update the patch? 13:42:31 okay 13:42:39 take your time then 13:43:00 yes XueFeng, will update it latter. :) 13:43:12 anything else on pike work items 13:43:13 ? 13:43:22 ok 13:43:25 we can move on now 13:43:34 #topic boston summit prep 13:43:56 I haven't got time to touch base with xinhui on the talk preps 13:44:04 will do that asap 13:44:22 elynn, any news you can share? 13:44:37 not yet now 13:44:42 okay 13:44:46 You could touch with xinhui 13:44:52 #topic open discussion 13:44:55 elynn, will do 13:45:05 XueFeng, your turn 13:45:13 Ok 13:45:20 xinhui and I are working on open-o staff recently. 13:45:29 In 2017.3.18 there is a openstack meetup in NanJing China. 13:45:53 And there will be a atricle about the meetup in weixin "yunkaiyuan". 13:45:55 elynn, take my knees 13:45:57 18th, April? 13:46:11 March 13:46:20 oh, you mean the meetup has finished 13:46:27 Have finished:) 13:46:36 The first topic is about senlin project. 13:46:39 Just some trivial things which trap xinhui too. 13:46:46 :) 13:47:10 XueFeng, that is great 13:47:12 And I do a introduce for senlin:) 13:47:15 Good to know more people in Nanjing get to know senlin! 13:47:54 Yes 13:48:00 That will be 13:48:17 Four parts about this topic. 13:48:46 1. Cluster requirements in openstack 13:49:15 XueFeng, I think most of us have read the article you wrote 13:49:18 it is great 13:49:23 2.What is senlin and what is senlin can do 13:49:32 yep :) 13:49:33 what we are curious about is the questions 13:49:40 expectations 13:49:43 complaints 13:49:55 or problems we can help address 13:49:56 also shared it to my colleagues 13:50:26 3.How to slove as+ha+lb all in one.Senlin can do this 13:50:45 4.Senlin Boston submit 13:50:57 Senlin in Boston Submit 13:51:49 And in the meetup 13:52:16 Anohter people intordue Sahara 13:52:23 person 13:53:00 And I think we need to do some explaination about senlin and sahara 13:53:43 What is the different. Many peoples don't know 13:55:07 any other feedback? 13:55:46 Yes 13:57:19 okay, if you have a summary 13:57:29 you can send it out later to the team 13:57:37 OK 13:57:40 :) 13:57:44 if there are no other topics for discussion 13:57:54 we can release the channel now 13:58:11 ok 13:58:19 good night,all 13:58:24 thanks for joining, guys 13:58:31 #endmeeting