15:02:00 <sdague> #startmeeting service-catalog-tng
15:02:00 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Jan 21 15:02:00 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is sdague. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:02:01 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:02:03 <cdent> o/
15:02:04 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'service_catalog_tng'
15:02:25 <sdague> Agenda
15:02:28 <sdague> #link - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ServiceCatalogTNG
15:02:40 <sdague> the spec is in, so I'll remove that from the list
15:03:10 <sdague> the nova patch is here - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/233076
15:03:13 <sdague> it's been approved
15:03:26 <sdague> now it's just about getting through the gate
15:03:27 <bknudson> ouch -1d
15:03:28 <cdent> hooo blooming ray
15:03:49 <sdague> bknudson: which -1?
15:04:19 <bknudson> the -1s were for some typos
15:04:22 <sdague> the review -1 is a nit
15:04:26 <sdague> it was overridden
15:04:39 <sdague> jenkins -1 is the current gate fails
15:04:48 <sdague> which we just made non voting
15:04:54 <sdague> so, hopefully it will flush through
15:05:09 <sdague> there is a tempest fix needed to make this devstack default
15:05:23 <bknudson> what's the tempest fix?
15:05:31 <sdague> because of some alt_tenant negative tests that attempt to do it with changing urls
15:05:37 <sdague> which, obviously, don't work now
15:06:08 <sdague> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/233079/
15:06:10 <bknudson> I guess it could build the new url from the old one.
15:06:10 <sdague> that tests it
15:06:20 <sdague> bknudson: ... ?
15:06:44 <sdague> the test assumes it can replace the project_id from the url with a different value to make a 404 url
15:06:55 <bknudson> the url is like compute/whatever so it could build compute/<new-project>/whatever
15:06:58 <sdague> which is not possible if there is no project_id in the test
15:07:13 <sdague> yeh, possible, it's a very low value test
15:07:15 <bknudson> just like you could convert compute/whatever to compute/<project>/whatever
15:07:25 <sdague> and, honestly, probably shouldn't be in tempest anyway
15:07:59 <bknudson> I agree doesn't sound like something that tempest needs to validate.
15:08:04 <sdague> anyway, that's the in flight work
15:08:45 <annegentle> I don't have any updates
15:08:52 <sdague> the real question is, what's next, and who might step up
15:09:11 <annegentle> what is next?
15:09:16 <bknudson> we're just about done.
15:09:29 <sdague> * there are other projects that need the project_id optional removed
15:09:48 <sdague> however we're at a part of the cycle where they might not take those patches
15:09:53 <annegentle> true
15:09:57 <bknudson> I've got a couple of bits in flight for keystone -- trying to get it to work with no version endpoint and also with keystone on a path (rather than separate port).
15:10:06 <cdent> do we have a checklist or similar somewhere?
15:10:07 <bknudson> I didn't have much time to work on it this week due to other stuff
15:10:18 <bknudson> could we put together an etherpad to track the work?
15:10:21 <sdague> we have the schema questions
15:10:35 <bknudson> actually, there's an etherpad already...
15:11:01 <sdague> we can do many things, it's just hard to spend the energy on it without knowing if anyone else is going to help :)
15:11:48 <bknudson> I'm planning to work on this. It's going to be a long-term effort
15:12:08 <sdague> ok, so I think the next thing we need is the schema for a new catalog
15:12:31 <sdague> but that definitely needs keystone leadership on it
15:12:37 <bknudson> how do you want to define the schema? jsonschema?
15:12:56 <sdague> jsonschema is fine
15:13:07 <sdague> lots of words are fine
15:13:21 <bknudson> we'll probably need both so that we can validate
15:13:25 <sdague> we have the outstanding issues about the url types, publicURL, internalURL
15:13:27 <sdague> etc
15:14:03 <annegentle> even just a draft jsonschema to get people talking would be a good next step
15:14:06 <sdague> yeh
15:14:14 <sdague> bknudson: is that something you could take a stab at?
15:14:31 <bknudson> sdague: sure... keystone meetup is next week
15:14:35 <bknudson> maybe I can get this on the agenda
15:14:41 <sdague> bknudson: great, thanks!
15:14:48 <sdague> bknudson: where is the keystone meetup?
15:14:51 <bknudson> if I can't get this on the agenda then we've got bigger problems.
15:15:00 <bknudson> Wed - Fri next week in Austin
15:15:39 <sdague> great
15:15:52 <bknudson> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/keystone-mitaka-midcycle
15:15:58 <bknudson> I added it to the proposed work items.
15:16:19 <sdague> sounds great.
15:16:39 <sdague> this is going to be at the end of the nova meetup next week, so I'm going to propose we skip next week, and circle back the week after.
15:16:56 <cdent> +1
15:16:59 <annegentle> sounds good
15:17:05 <annegentle> and thanks bknudson
15:17:20 <sdague> ok, great, anything else from folks?
15:17:40 <annegentle> nada
15:17:50 <sdague> great, thanks folks. See you in 2 weeks.
15:17:52 <sdague> #endmeeting