17:01:06 <cathy_> #startmeeting service_chaining 17:01:09 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Jan 28 17:01:06 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is cathy_. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:01:10 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:01:13 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'service_chaining' 17:01:18 <pcarver> hello 17:01:23 <cathy_> pcarver: hi 17:01:26 <s3wong> hello 17:01:30 <cathy_> s3wong: hi 17:01:35 <hdaniel> hi 17:01:42 <cathy_> hdaniel: hi 17:01:56 <cathy_> any specific topic you have in mind? 17:02:29 <mohankumar> Hi 17:02:33 <cathy_> mohankumar: hi 17:03:24 <hdaniel> congradulations on the v1.0.0 drop :) 17:03:35 <cathy_> hdaniel: yes! 17:04:21 <cathy_> This is the mitaka code based release. 17:04:58 <cathy_> We are thinking about releasing a liberty code based release. With some minor code change, we can do that 17:05:43 <cathy_> I think we need to pull another liberty code based branch. 17:05:48 <cathy_> Swami: hi 17:06:01 <Swami> cathy_: hi 17:06:36 <cathy_> It seems we can not pull the branch ourselves. Anyone knows whom we should ask to pull that branch? release team? 17:07:03 <cathy_> I mean the same release team who help us do the release? 17:07:33 <cathy_> Swami: do you know this? 17:07:51 <Swami> cathy_: no I am not aware about it. check with armax or HenryG 17:07:55 <mohankumar> cathy_ , not understanding the context , why not on top of stable-liberty ? 17:08:48 <cathy_> mohankumar: what I mean is on top of stable liberty? But we need to pull a networking-sfc branch to do that liberty code base release, right? 17:09:08 <cathy_> Swami: Ok, thanks 17:09:22 <HenryG> For release management and requests, mestery is the one to talk to 17:09:29 <mohankumar> cathy_ : okay got it 17:10:16 <cathy_> HenryG: OK, will try mestery again. Thanks! 17:12:06 <cathy_> pcarver: we have the patch merged, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/271101/, but it does not show up in networking-sfc document link page http://docs.openstack.org/developer/networking-sfc/ . Do you know why? what is missing in the commit? 17:12:22 <cathy_> prithiv: hi 17:12:28 <prithiv> Hi cathy 17:12:48 <pcarver> cathy_: I don't know but I'll look 17:13:45 <cathy_> pcarver: thanks. If I remember correctly, this issue happened before to you. Then you fix something. Anyway let's sync up offline on this. 17:14:19 <cathy_> pcarver: or if you can take a look at it now and let us know, that will be great. 17:14:43 <pcarver> cathy_: looking now, but if it's not obvious I'll let you know later 17:15:12 <cathy_> pcarver: thanks! 17:16:13 <cathy_> mohankumar: now that the networking-sfc first version is released, I think networking-sfc on ONOS can be released next, what do you think? How is the ONOS work going? 17:16:52 <prithiv> i have few concerns about the setup, and couple of issues as well… i will sync up with everyone through email 17:16:56 <mohankumar> cathy_ , any date you targeting ? 17:17:12 <cathy_> mohankumar: not really. Just would like to have an idea. 17:17:37 <mohankumar> ONOS work is going good ... we tested code changes locally also 17:17:52 <cathy_> prithiv: OK, sure. 17:18:20 <cathy_> mohankumar: good! 17:19:10 <mohankumar> cathy_ : we can sync-up some time offline and disscuss about ONOS release plan 17:19:21 <cathy_> mohankumar: Ok, sure. 17:19:32 <mohankumar> cathy_ : thanks ! 17:21:19 <cathy_> that's all from my side. 17:22:21 <cathy_> I would encourage that everyone download the released code and set up different testing scenarios and submit bugs on the project launchpad link. 17:23:15 <s3wong> +1 17:23:25 <mohankumar> cathy_ : ok 17:24:09 <raofei> I have a suggestion that is to enhance the integration test with tempest. 17:24:54 <cathy_> raofei: good suggestion! 17:26:08 <cathy_> anyone would like to take that work or help with that work? 17:26:29 <cathy_> s3wong: ? :-) 17:26:45 <mohankumar> cathy_ : i can help ! 17:26:54 <cathy_> mohankumar: thanks. 17:26:56 <pcarver> cathy_: I'll need to take a look at the docs publishing later. I'm heading to the airport shortly. 17:27:36 <cathy_> pcarver: sure, when are you going to be on land so that I can ping you? 17:27:55 <pcarver> It does look like the formatting in the RST may be off though. You can look at the pre-rendered version from Jenkins: http://docs-draft.openstack.org/01/271101/2/gate/gate-networking-sfc-docs/28a4796//doc/build/html/ 17:28:12 <cathy_> mohankumar: We have started working on the tempest tests, but more help is welcome! 17:28:50 <mohankumar> cathy_ , please let me know the work items 17:29:03 <mohankumar> cathy_ , i can take some parts 17:29:25 <pcarver> cathy_: around 1800 EST, but I don't know how long to get a rental car and get to the hotel. Probably won't get to it before 1930 EST at least 17:29:50 <cathy_> pcarver: Ok, don't quite get the point about formatting. 17:30:03 <cathy_> pcarver: Oh, got it 17:30:42 <pcarver> I don't know if the formatting is related to it not getting published, though. Could be totally unrelated. 17:30:44 <cathy_> pcarver: so pre-rendered version has it, but in wrong format. The final rendered version does not have it, right? 17:30:56 <pcarver> cathy_: right 17:32:19 <cathy_> pcarver: I will ask Xiaodong to try to correct the format to see if it works. Will ping you later if it does not work. Could you send me a link to your previous patch that update the document if you have time? I can not find it somehow. 17:33:39 <pcarver> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/225254/ 17:33:46 <cathy_> pcarver: Thanks. 17:34:53 <cathy_> anyone has any more topic? If not, we can end the meeting early today. 17:35:02 <cathy_> pcarver: have a nice trip! 17:35:16 <pcarver> cathy_: thanks 17:35:22 <cathy_> Let's count 17:35:25 <cathy_> 5 17:35:25 <mohankumar> cathy_: nothing from my side 17:35:32 <cathy_> 4 17:35:32 <mohankumar> 4 17:35:37 <cathy_> mohankumar: :-) 17:35:40 <cathy_> 3 17:35:45 <cathy_> 2 17:35:49 <cathy_> 1 17:35:54 <cathy_> bye everyone 17:36:02 <mohankumar> bye 17:36:04 <hdaniel> bye 17:36:06 <mohankumar> exit 17:36:25 <cathy_> #endmeeting