17:02:22 <LouisF> #startmeeting service_chaining
17:02:24 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Jul  6 17:02:22 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is LouisF. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
17:02:25 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
17:02:27 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'service_chaining'
17:02:38 <pcarver> hi
17:02:43 <vks1> hi all
17:02:53 <LouisF> pcarver: hi
17:02:57 <LouisF> vks1: hi
17:03:06 <doonhammer> hi all
17:03:07 <LouisF> agenda https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ServiceFunctionChainingMeeting
17:03:14 <LouisF> #topic agenda
17:04:48 <LouisF> #topic CLI in python-neutronclient
17:05:12 <LouisF> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/409759/
17:05:22 <LouisF> i see still more comments
17:06:17 <LouisF> i will contact Mohan
17:06:37 <LouisF> #topic API reference
17:06:57 <LouisF> pcarver: what is status?
17:07:33 <pcarver> The API reference is fine, but I'm really not getting much of anywhere with the API definition. I don't have a lot of time to concentrate on it an every time I start I end up digging into dependencies on things I can't import.
17:08:46 <LouisF> were you able to contact the neutron-lib folks to resolve this?
17:09:57 <pcarver> no, I'm working on it in short periods between meetings. Hardly have any block of time to dedicate to discussing it.
17:10:46 <LouisF> pcarver: ok i will look at getting help for you
17:10:58 <pcarver> My last attempt is to roll back everything and try to do it a little bit at a time
17:11:40 <LouisF> pcarver: ok
17:11:51 <LouisF> #topic Pike  work
17:12:05 <pcarver> I'm thinking I could upload a partial patch set and get feedback on a little piece at a time and try to keep it passing tox tests all the time even though incomplete
17:12:37 <LouisF> pcarver: ok thanks sounds like a good approach
17:12:51 <LouisF> #topic API and CLI changes for Passive TAP SF
17:13:39 <LouisF> looks like Vikash dropped
17:14:36 <LouisF> anyway there was discussion on port-pair-group-parameters
17:14:56 <LouisF> to split it up into separate parameters
17:15:49 <LouisF> pcarver: i think you suggested that
17:16:14 <pcarver> LouisF: yes, it looks like that one parameter is getting too overloaded
17:16:35 <LouisF> pcarver: i think it would be best to do that
17:17:00 <pcarver> I don't know exactly where the line is, but passing complicated data structures as a single parameter isn't very user friendly
17:17:07 <LouisF> i will suggest to Vikash to do that
17:18:22 <LouisF> #topic SFC graph
17:18:32 <LouisF> igordcard: what is status?
17:19:58 <LouisF> ok moving on
17:20:23 <LouisF> #topic OVN driver work
17:20:39 <LouisF> doonhammer: how is the OVN work going?
17:21:32 <doonhammer> not much - been swamped by my day job :-(
17:21:41 <LouisF> doonhammer: ok thanks
17:21:54 <LouisF> #topic other topics
17:22:09 <guest_145> sorry i logged in as guest_145 - vks1
17:22:12 <LouisF> anythng else to discuss?
17:22:24 <guest_145> look like issue in my irc client
17:22:59 <guest_145> hi Louis regarding your comment on ppg parameter
17:23:14 <LouisF> guest_145: yes?
17:24:02 <guest_145> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/449954/
17:24:12 <guest_145> ur last comment
17:25:12 <LouisF> guest_145: go ahead
17:25:46 <guest_145> so i was thinking to put a separate patch to have ppg-parameters as separate API
17:26:16 <guest_145> as pcarver also have given comment to rellok on the parameters
17:27:12 <guest_145> LouisF: or you are suggesting we should add 'tap_enabled' attribute to ppg directly instead of ppg-parmeters
17:27:17 <guest_145> LouisF: ?
17:27:24 <LouisF> guest_145: yes, correct
17:28:05 <guest_145> LouisF: so move 'tap_enabled' attribute will suffice ?
17:28:14 <guest_145> *moving
17:28:32 <LouisF> guest_145: add a 'tap-enabled' option to PPG
17:29:14 <LouisF> and remove from ppg-parameters
17:29:17 <guest_145> OK but it will take some time
17:29:29 <guest_145> LouisF: will it be fine ?
17:29:35 <LouisF> guest_145: that's fine
17:29:51 <guest_145> LouisF: OK thankyou, will do that
17:30:04 <LouisF> guest_145: great, thanks
17:30:30 <LouisF> any other topics?
17:31:32 <LouisF> ok thats all I have, thanks all
17:31:42 <LouisF> bye all
17:31:46 <guest_145> bye
17:31:51 <LouisF> #endmeeting