17:01:01 <LouisF> #startmeeting service_chaining 17:01:02 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Jul 20 17:01:01 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is LouisF. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:01:03 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:01:05 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'service_chaining' 17:01:10 <pcarver> hi 17:01:13 <LouisF> hi all 17:01:22 <vks1> hi all 17:01:23 <bcafarel> hello 17:01:50 <LouisF> #topic agenda 17:01:52 <LouisF> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ServiceFunctionChainingMeeting 17:02:38 <LouisF> #topic CLI in python-neutronclient 17:02:57 <LouisF> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/409759/ 17:03:33 <LouisF> i think we are close on getting this merged 17:03:57 <bcafarel> two +2, and last comment about missing fc unset command was adressed, so I'd say yes :) 17:04:20 <LouisF> bcafarel: yes 17:05:05 <LouisF> ok good 17:05:14 <LouisF> #topic API reference 17:06:18 <LouisF> pcarver: what is status? 17:06:51 <pcarver> I haven't done anything since patch set 9 last week and there haven't been any reviews. 17:07:20 <pcarver> There was a failure on the gate-neutron-lib-docs-ubuntu-xenial job but I haven't looked into the cause yet. 17:07:51 <LouisF> pcarver: ok thanks 17:08:03 <pcarver> PS9 passed all other tests, but I need someone else to look at it to see if I've missed anything 17:08:46 <LouisF> pcarver: i will have a look at it 17:08:50 <bcafarel> hmm I did not see PS9 pass by sorry 17:08:56 <bcafarel> will take a look too 17:09:23 <LouisF> pcarver: thanks 17:09:28 <pcarver> I cut way back on what I was migrating to try to get at a minimal set 17:09:30 <LouisF> #topic Pike work 17:09:41 <LouisF> #topic Tap SF 17:09:52 <LouisF> vks1: what is status? 17:10:22 <vks1> i will try to submit this week 17:10:41 <vks1> there is review coments by igordcard 17:10:45 <vks1> i am addressing that 17:11:00 <LouisF> vks1: ok great 17:11:36 <LouisF> #topic SFC graph 17:11:49 <LouisF> igordcard: what is status? 17:12:10 <bcafarel> igordcard said he would not be able to attend, here is his status update: 17:12:21 <bcafarel> "I haven't updated the graphs documentation yet, working on nsh, trying to get it done before pike-3" 17:12:58 <LouisF> bcafarel: ok thanks 17:15:01 <LouisF> #topic Non-transparent SF 17:15:38 <LouisF> bcafarel: you had comments on the latest PS 17:16:36 <bcafarel> LouisF: yes, joining igordcard's idea in fact 17:17:28 <bcafarel> if we only use this system for corner-case deployments, the main idea looks ok 17:18:11 <bcafarel> but if a sizeable part uses non-transparent SFs, it would be better to be able to still use the current system 17:18:39 <LouisF> there are a small number of cases where this would be useful 17:20:01 <LouisF> bcafarel: so you prefer to use an exclusive PPG? 17:21:15 <bcafarel> LouisF: concept-wise yep it looks cleaner (it is still a normal PPG, it just cannot be used in another) 17:21:39 <bcafarel> and preserves the load-balancing capabilities (if user wants to add another SF to the group) 17:22:12 <LouisF> bcafarel: I can include it as an implementation option 17:22:48 <bcafarel> LouisF: sounds good :) 17:23:04 <LouisF> bcafarel: ok will update the spec for that 17:23:09 <bcafarel> I did not check flows-wise if this causes problems or not, it's just on reading the spec 17:23:33 <LouisF> bcafarel: it should work ok 17:24:06 <LouisF> #topic OVN driver 17:24:22 <LouisF> doonhammer: John what is sttaus? 17:24:33 <LouisF> status 17:25:05 <doonhammer> Sorry nothing happening stuck in internal project 17:25:27 <LouisF> doonhammer: ok thanks 17:25:36 <bcafarel> doonhammer: just on the ovn core code, that means probably ovs 2.9 then? 17:25:47 <bcafarel> as 2.8 release is near 17:26:05 <doonhammer> yes think so, not going to get to 2.8 sorry 17:26:35 <bcafarel> doonhammer: np, just checking to keep the agenda in order :) 17:26:46 <doonhammer> :-) 17:26:54 <LouisF> #topic other items 17:27:07 <LouisF> anything else to discuss? 17:27:56 <bcafarel> I'd like to get https://bugs.launchpad.net/networking-sfc/+bug/1675289 moving before Pike release 17:27:58 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1675289 in networking-sfc "hash algorithm is not set in group table" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to Ching Sun (chingsun) 17:28:33 <LouisF> bcafarel: agree that should be looked at 17:29:04 <LouisF> I can contact Ching on that 17:29:46 <LouisF> ok thats all I have 17:30:01 <LouisF> thanks all 17:30:04 <LouisF> bye 17:30:10 <bcafarel> thanks, good day/night/whatever! 17:30:22 <LouisF> #endmeeting