17:01:01 <LouisF> #startmeeting service_chaining
17:01:02 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Jul 20 17:01:01 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is LouisF. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
17:01:03 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
17:01:05 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'service_chaining'
17:01:10 <pcarver> hi
17:01:13 <LouisF> hi all
17:01:22 <vks1> hi all
17:01:23 <bcafarel> hello
17:01:50 <LouisF> #topic agenda
17:01:52 <LouisF> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ServiceFunctionChainingMeeting
17:02:38 <LouisF> #topic CLI in python-neutronclient
17:02:57 <LouisF> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/409759/
17:03:33 <LouisF> i think we are close on getting this merged
17:03:57 <bcafarel> two +2, and last comment about missing fc unset command was adressed, so I'd say yes :)
17:04:20 <LouisF> bcafarel: yes
17:05:05 <LouisF> ok good
17:05:14 <LouisF> #topic API reference
17:06:18 <LouisF> pcarver: what is status?
17:06:51 <pcarver> I haven't done anything since patch set 9 last week and there haven't been any reviews.
17:07:20 <pcarver> There was a failure on the gate-neutron-lib-docs-ubuntu-xenial job but I haven't looked into the cause yet.
17:07:51 <LouisF> pcarver: ok thanks
17:08:03 <pcarver> PS9 passed all other tests, but I need someone else to look at it to see if I've missed anything
17:08:46 <LouisF> pcarver: i will have a look at it
17:08:50 <bcafarel> hmm I did not see PS9 pass by sorry
17:08:56 <bcafarel> will take a look too
17:09:23 <LouisF> pcarver: thanks
17:09:28 <pcarver> I cut way back on what I was migrating to try to get at a minimal set
17:09:30 <LouisF> #topic Pike work
17:09:41 <LouisF> #topic Tap SF
17:09:52 <LouisF> vks1: what is status?
17:10:22 <vks1> i will try to submit this week
17:10:41 <vks1> there is review coments by igordcard
17:10:45 <vks1> i am addressing that
17:11:00 <LouisF> vks1: ok great
17:11:36 <LouisF> #topic SFC graph
17:11:49 <LouisF> igordcard: what is status?
17:12:10 <bcafarel> igordcard said he would not be able to attend, here is his status update:
17:12:21 <bcafarel> "I haven't updated the graphs documentation yet, working on nsh, trying to get it done before pike-3"
17:12:58 <LouisF> bcafarel: ok thanks
17:15:01 <LouisF> #topic Non-transparent SF
17:15:38 <LouisF> bcafarel: you had comments on the latest PS
17:16:36 <bcafarel> LouisF: yes, joining igordcard's idea in fact
17:17:28 <bcafarel> if we only use this system for corner-case deployments, the main idea looks ok
17:18:11 <bcafarel> but if a sizeable part uses non-transparent SFs, it would be better to be able to still use the current system
17:18:39 <LouisF> there are a small number  of  cases where this would be useful
17:20:01 <LouisF> bcafarel: so you prefer to use an exclusive PPG?
17:21:15 <bcafarel> LouisF: concept-wise yep it looks cleaner (it is still a normal PPG, it just cannot be used in another)
17:21:39 <bcafarel> and preserves the load-balancing capabilities (if user wants to add another SF to the group)
17:22:12 <LouisF> bcafarel:  I can include it as an implementation option
17:22:48 <bcafarel> LouisF: sounds good :)
17:23:04 <LouisF> bcafarel: ok will update the spec for that
17:23:09 <bcafarel> I did not check flows-wise if this causes problems or not, it's just on reading the spec
17:23:33 <LouisF> bcafarel: it should work ok
17:24:06 <LouisF> #topic OVN driver
17:24:22 <LouisF> doonhammer: John what is sttaus?
17:24:33 <LouisF> status
17:25:05 <doonhammer> Sorry nothing happening stuck in internal project
17:25:27 <LouisF> doonhammer: ok thanks
17:25:36 <bcafarel> doonhammer: just on the ovn core code, that means probably ovs 2.9 then?
17:25:47 <bcafarel> as 2.8 release is near
17:26:05 <doonhammer> yes think so, not going to get to 2.8 sorry
17:26:35 <bcafarel> doonhammer: np, just checking to keep the agenda in order :)
17:26:46 <doonhammer> :-)
17:26:54 <LouisF> #topic other items
17:27:07 <LouisF> anything else to discuss?
17:27:56 <bcafarel> I'd like to get https://bugs.launchpad.net/networking-sfc/+bug/1675289 moving before Pike release
17:27:58 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1675289 in networking-sfc "hash algorithm is not set in group table" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to Ching Sun (chingsun)
17:28:33 <LouisF> bcafarel: agree that should be looked at
17:29:04 <LouisF> I can contact Ching on that
17:29:46 <LouisF> ok thats all I have
17:30:01 <LouisF> thanks all
17:30:04 <LouisF> bye
17:30:10 <bcafarel> thanks, good day/night/whatever!
17:30:22 <LouisF> #endmeeting