17:00:21 <LouisF> #startmeeting service_chaining
17:00:22 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Jul 27 17:00:21 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is LouisF. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
17:00:23 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
17:00:26 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'service_chaining'
17:00:37 <LouisF> hi all
17:01:28 <igordcard> `hi LouisF
17:01:55 <LouisF> igordcard: hi
17:02:37 <LouisF> #topic agenda
17:02:43 <pcarver> hi
17:02:56 <LouisF> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ServiceFunctionChainingMeeting
17:02:59 <LouisF> pcarver: hi
17:03:27 <LouisF> #topic CLI in python-neutronclient
17:04:03 <LouisF> This merged - thanks to Mohan for hard work and perserverance
17:04:19 <LouisF> #topic API reference
17:04:41 <pcarver> I don't think there's been any change since last week.
17:04:52 <LouisF> pcarver: ok thanks
17:04:58 <LouisF> #topic Pike work
17:05:02 <pcarver> I don't recall seeing any new review comments, but I haven't had much time to focus on it
17:05:17 <LouisF> pcarver: ok
17:06:05 <LouisF> #topic SFC tap
17:06:07 <LouisF> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/449954/
17:07:12 <LouisF> There should be a new patch to address the latest comment on using OSC plugin
17:07:28 <LouisF> looks like Vikash is not on the call
17:07:48 <LouisF> #topic SFC Graph
17:07:59 <LouisF> igordcard: what is the status?
17:08:22 <igordcard> waiting to get reviewed
17:08:47 <igordcard> have to reply to some recent bcafarel comments
17:08:53 <igordcard> but they don't block other reviews
17:09:11 <igordcard> and I updated the documentation patch
17:09:21 <LouisF> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/478668/
17:09:24 <igordcard> yes
17:09:42 <LouisF> igordcard: ok all, please review
17:10:02 <igordcard> there's also the NSH work
17:10:11 <LouisF> also https://review.openstack.org/#/c/424370/
17:10:31 <LouisF> igordcard: how is the NSH work?
17:10:39 <igordcard> all the patches that have Graph in the name from this topic:
17:10:40 <igordcard> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:sfc_encapsulation
17:10:51 <igordcard> need reviews
17:11:02 <igordcard> the NSH work is in
17:11:03 <igordcard> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/373465/
17:11:08 <LouisF> igordcard: will review
17:11:27 <igordcard> and it's also ready but the patch that I submitted before it was breaking the tempest tests
17:11:41 <igordcard> I know how to avoid and that shouldn't be a problem anymore, but there's another issue
17:11:51 <LouisF> igordcard: what is the the dependency on OVS support for NSH?
17:12:30 <igordcard> the CLI tests are failing on my NSH patch (and will probably fail on the graphs too) because I have to rebase
17:12:36 <igordcard> that's why I did the recheck here:
17:12:37 <igordcard> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/486407/
17:12:43 <igordcard> just to see if it would fail in the same way
17:12:59 <igordcard> as I haven't quite figured out the source of the cli test failure yet
17:13:08 <igordcard> now about NSH/OVS:
17:13:48 <igordcard> NSH should be available in OVS 2.8, which can be used by neutron but
17:14:07 <igordcard> there will be no kernel datapath compatible with NSH at the time of releae
17:14:19 <igordcard> I don't know if this is a blocker to merge the NSH patch in networking-sfc or not
17:14:56 <LouisF> igordcard: is there a kernel patch?
17:15:35 <igordcard> there's some work to get there but I don't know if the patches ahve already been submitted
17:15:58 <igordcard> but because the patches have to go though different phases/trees, it would be at least another month
17:16:11 <LouisF> do you know when ovs 2.8 will be  available?
17:16:22 <igordcard> mid-august to september
17:17:31 <LouisF> ok then we can have the nsh work ready by oct/nov?
17:18:10 <igordcard> the nsh work for net-sfc is ready (I'm using the final interface that will be available in OVS)
17:18:56 <igordcard> but if there's a need for kernel ovs to support it then yeah perhaps october-november we could merge, meaning that it would be available in Queens instead
17:19:12 <LouisF> it worj be good to get the sfc graph and  nsh done by november
17:19:16 <LouisF> would
17:19:36 <igordcard> my expectaction was that the graphs wo
17:19:39 <igordcard> would merge in pike
17:19:39 <LouisF> how about sfc graph in pike?
17:20:09 <igordcard> graph doesn't have any dependencies, it just uses normal MPLS
17:20:46 <LouisF> ok that is fine: sfc graph in pike and tested nsh support in queens
17:21:03 <igordcard> OK
17:21:15 <igordcard> just one more thing
17:21:29 <LouisF> igordcard: yes?
17:21:31 <igordcard> feature freeze is this week
17:22:43 <igordcard> do we do hard freeze or simply try to get things merged now asap?
17:23:12 <igordcard> basically I'm asking if there's a risk that the graphs aren't merging in pike solely because of the feature freeze
17:23:33 <LouisF> igordcard: i think we can get Tap SF and SFC graph in for sure
17:23:46 <igordcard> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/486407/
17:23:55 <igordcard> wrong link
17:23:58 <igordcard> https://releases.openstack.org/pike/schedule.html
17:24:10 <igordcard> ok cool
17:26:03 <LouisF> lets get these two merged this week
17:27:17 <LouisF> #topic OVN driver
17:27:25 <LouisF> doonhammer: what is status?
17:27:46 <doonhammer> still no progress
17:27:50 <doonhammer> aplogies
17:28:00 <LouisF> doonhammer: np thanks
17:28:37 <LouisF> #topic SF port proxy
17:29:03 <LouisF> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/481840/
17:29:18 <LouisF> will update with  new patch
17:29:43 <LouisF> #topic Other topics and discussion
17:30:03 <LouisF> any items to address?
17:30:47 <igordcard> all good
17:31:40 <LouisF> we will be pulling a pike branch in about a month from now
17:33:06 <LouisF> please vote on talks you would like to see at the summit
17:33:12 <LouisF> https://www.openstack.org/summit/sydney-2017/vote-for-speakers
17:33:20 <igordcard> ohh it's out, nice
17:33:21 <igordcard> thanks
17:33:38 <LouisF> ok thanks all
17:33:40 <LouisF> bye
17:34:04 <LouisF> #endmeeting