17:12:38 <LouisF> #startmeeting service_chaining
17:12:38 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Aug  3 17:12:38 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is LouisF. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
17:12:39 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
17:12:41 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'service_chaining'
17:12:52 <LouisF> hi all, sorry for delay
17:13:17 <LouisF> agenda
17:13:19 <LouisF> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ServiceFunctionChainingMeeting#Agenda_for_the_Networking-SFC_Meeting_.288.2F3.2F2017.29
17:13:40 <bcafarel> hello LouisF
17:13:46 <LouisF> bcafarel: hi
17:13:54 <vks1> hi all
17:14:00 <LouisF> vks1: hi
17:14:39 <LouisF> #topic agenda
17:15:05 <igordcard> hi
17:15:12 <LouisF> anything to add to agenda?
17:15:19 <LouisF> igordcard: hi
17:15:33 <igordcard> Pike alignment
17:15:43 <LouisF> igordcard: ok
17:16:55 <LouisF> #topic Tap SF
17:17:01 <LouisF> vks1: what is status?
17:17:58 <vks1> LouisF: I have uploaded new patch set for client, OSC patch I will try to upload by this week, I am testing driver patch
17:18:09 <vks1> will be hopefully ready soon
17:18:28 <vks1> have removed tap_enabled from ppg_parameter
17:18:40 <LouisF> vks1: yes i saw that
17:19:01 <pcarver> Hi. Joining late.
17:19:01 <LouisF> will review the osc patch
17:19:10 <LouisF> pcarver: hi
17:19:37 <vks1> ok
17:19:38 <LouisF> #topic API reference
17:19:47 <LouisF> pcarver: what is  status?
17:20:27 <pcarver> no change since last week. I don't think there have been any new reviews. The commit message does still have WIP in the subject line. I can push a patch set to remove that.
17:20:48 <pcarver> Maybe that will prompt some reviews.
17:21:08 <LouisF> pcarver: ok will review
17:21:25 <bcafarel> it's been some time since I looked at it :/
17:21:35 <LouisF> #topic SFC graph
17:22:13 <LouisF> igordcard: what is status?
17:22:34 <igordcard> documentation failed jenkins, will correct soon
17:22:50 <igordcard> but still waiting for more reviews on the other patches
17:22:51 <LouisF> igordcard: ok thanks
17:23:01 * bcafarel checks his review backlog
17:23:41 <LouisF> igordcard: i am in process of reviewing https://review.openstack.org/#/c/424370/
17:24:35 <LouisF> #topic NSH dataplane
17:25:09 <LouisF> i have seen activity on the OVS mailer on the NSH patch
17:25:58 <bcafarel> is it still on track for 2.8?
17:26:48 <LouisF> i think so
17:26:56 <igordcard> yes
17:27:09 <igordcard> the generic encap/decap merged in ovs, so that's one less piece missing
17:27:34 <bcafarel> would be great
17:27:39 <LouisF> that is good news
17:27:47 <bcafarel> it will also help to test deployments without having to get a patched ovs in :)
17:28:04 <LouisF> bcafarel: yes indeed
17:29:08 <igordcard> the networking-sfc respective patch is on hold until nsh kernel datapath becomes available
17:29:08 <LouisF> #topic Pike alignment
17:29:23 <LouisF> igordcard: yes
17:30:01 <igordcard> amotoki left some comments here https://review.openstack.org/#/c/487842/
17:30:18 <igordcard> and then we talked on IRC
17:30:51 <igordcard> seems that python neutronclient for pike is ready and released
17:31:09 <igordcard> meaning that it also lacks service graphs and tap sf support
17:31:22 <igordcard> see also: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/487190/
17:33:03 <LouisF> igordcard: does that pike release include other sfc commands?
17:33:07 <igordcard> but he also talked about backporting, so we might be able to backport the features that are going to merge soon
17:33:31 <igordcard> LouisF: I think the pike release includes basically what mohan kumar finished
17:33:32 <bcafarel> I am not sure about backporting entire new features on that one
17:33:49 <LouisF> igordcard: ok good
17:33:51 <bcafarel> but yes the current one is ocata-level
17:33:52 <igordcard> LouisF: and maybe bcafarel's fix too, but in terms of features it's the same as mohan had
17:34:47 <igordcard> bcafarel: right.. he's probably sleeping now but hopefulyl we'll get more insight from him tomorrow
17:34:48 <LouisF> backporting sfc graph would be a lot of work
17:35:59 <bcafarel> yes mine is mostly fixing a help string, so feature wise it''s ok for backport
17:36:14 <LouisF> bcafarel: yes
17:37:23 <LouisF> need to set a Pike tag soon
17:38:03 <igordcard> so this means pike features with no respective client support during pike
17:38:19 <LouisF> and create stable/pike branch
17:38:38 <vks1> can we release without oscc ?
17:40:07 <LouisF> vks1: i think we need osc
17:41:26 <LouisF> igordcard: can you get direction from amotoki ?
17:42:49 <igordcard> LouisF: I'll ping him tomorrow
17:42:50 <LouisF> ok other items?
17:42:57 <LouisF> igordcard: thanks
17:44:00 <LouisF> #topic OVN driver
17:44:21 <LouisF> John is not on call
17:45:06 <LouisF> #topic Proxy -port correlation
17:45:10 <bcafarel> as it is not going to make it for ovs 2.8, no pressure here
17:45:13 <bcafarel> (ovn driver)
17:45:35 <LouisF> bcafarel: yes this will be Queens work
17:45:54 <LouisF> I will post a new patch soon
17:46:10 <LouisF> ok all I have for today
17:46:17 <LouisF> any other topics?
17:47:00 <LouisF> ok thanks all, bye
17:47:14 <vks1> bye
17:47:15 <bcafarel> bye!
17:47:19 <LouisF> #endmeeting