17:01:02 <LouisF> #startmeeting service_chaining
17:01:02 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Oct 12 17:01:02 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is LouisF. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
17:01:03 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
17:01:06 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'service_chaining'
17:01:16 <LouisF> hi all
17:01:43 <bcafarel> hello
17:01:52 <LouisF> bcafarel: hi
17:02:37 <vks1> hi all
17:02:48 <LouisF> vks1: hi
17:03:25 <LouisF> #topic Agenda
17:03:39 <LouisF> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ServiceFunctionChainingMeeting
17:04:05 <LouisF> #topic zuul
17:04:27 <LouisF> looks like still have zuul problems
17:04:35 <bcafarel> yes, the zuulv3 switch got delayed: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-October/123464.html
17:05:24 <bcafarel> so both Jenkins and Zuul (the second because of limited resources) tend to send -1
17:06:06 <LouisF> bcafarel: thanks
17:06:40 <LouisF> bcafarel: any idea when that will be resolved?
17:07:20 <bcafarel> LouisF: the devstack-gate issues should be fixed soon (infra is on it)
17:07:27 <LouisF> bcafarel: thanks
17:07:36 <bcafarel> though after that the actual zuulv3 migration will take place, so we will see then :)
17:07:58 <LouisF> #topic API reference
17:08:13 <LouisF> look like Thomas Morin is taking this on
17:08:39 <LouisF> #topic Tap SF
17:08:48 <LouisF> vks1: what is status?
17:08:59 <vks1> LouisF: I have resolved the issue
17:09:09 <vks1> uploaded the patch also
17:09:23 <LouisF> vks1: ok, will review today
17:09:26 <vks1> once Jenkins is resolved
17:09:33 <vks1> that will be gud
17:09:39 <vks1> LouisF: OK
17:10:04 <bcafarel> :)
17:10:21 <vks1> LouisF: I can help tmorin with API reference, if he needs any help
17:10:50 <LouisF> vks1: that would be great!
17:11:08 <bcafarel> vks1: you can probably catch him a bit earlier in #openstack-neutron
17:11:25 <vks1> bcafarel: ok probably tomorrow :)
17:11:59 <LouisF> #topic SFC Graph
17:12:14 <LouisF> igordc: looks like your patches merged
17:13:05 <bcafarel> he mentioned he had a "permanent" timeslot conflict now for the meeting (other meeting at the same time)
17:13:23 <bcafarel> but yes patches got in, there is one in python-neutronclient to add the OSC commands
17:13:33 <LouisF> bcafarel: yes
17:13:47 <bcafarel> python-neutronclient gates are broken atm though
17:13:53 <LouisF> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/510858/
17:14:33 <LouisF> #topic NSH dataplane
17:14:56 <LouisF> several patches in progress
17:15:14 <LouisF> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/373465/
17:15:32 <LouisF> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/510871/
17:16:36 <LouisF> Is there any work in progress on NSH-aware service functions?
17:17:30 <LouisF> #topic Non-transparent SF
17:18:08 <LouisF> dataplane underway for 'exclusive' PPG - patch should land soon
17:18:32 <LouisF> #topic OVN work
17:18:55 <LouisF> will contact John on this
17:19:15 <LouisF> #topic Tempest split
17:19:56 <LouisF> bcafarel: what is status on this?
17:20:14 <bcafarel> I started the work on that, hosting a separate temp repo for the plugin and preparing the patches to add this project in tree
17:20:24 <bcafarel> main review is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/510553/
17:21:06 <bcafarel> armax wondered if stadium projects should use a common repo (the neutron tempest plugin one), as we aim for API
17:21:39 <LouisF> bcafarel: has there been any discussion on that?
17:21:59 <bcafarel> will probably be discussed around neutron and with other stadium projects
17:22:02 <LouisF> bcafarel: what are other projects doing?
17:23:10 <bcafarel> LouisF: networking-l2gw has work in progress for a separate repo, but about the same point as mine
17:23:25 <bcafarel> others have not started the migration from my last check
17:23:41 <LouisF> bcafarel: so we are ahead of the  game
17:23:47 <LouisF> bcafarel: ok thanks
17:24:05 <bcafarel> LouisF: indeed :) we will see how it turns out in upcoming discussions or neutron meetings
17:24:20 <LouisF> #topic Other items
17:25:13 <vks1> LouisF: I remember mohankumar once metioned to work on monitroing, stats something like that
17:25:34 <vks1> do we have started anything there ?
17:25:52 <LouisF> vks1: yes indeed, that is work I would like to see started
17:26:15 <vks1> can we start putting together thoughts on that ?
17:26:26 <LouisF> we can instrument the code for SFC metrics
17:26:39 <LouisF> yes, definitely
17:27:05 <vks1> lets start it, I think that's something crucial which is missing
17:27:08 <LouisF> the other item is fault detection and isolation in the dataplane
17:27:26 <vks1> even that too
17:28:25 <vks1> can we start collaborating on etherpad ?
17:28:40 <vks1> to start
17:28:47 <LouisF> there are some IETF  drafts: https://tools.ietf.org/pdf/draft-ao-sfc-oam-path-consistency-00.pdf
17:28:54 <LouisF> vks1: yes
17:29:29 <LouisF> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ao-sfc-oam-return-path-specified/
17:29:58 <LouisF> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework/
17:30:38 <LouisF> it would be good to include some of this
17:31:02 <vks1> I will study these documents
17:31:12 <LouisF> any other topics?
17:31:34 <bcafarel> odl backend has some open bugs apparently (last bugs reported in https://launchpad.net/networking-odl ), rajivk is working on them (around in #networking-sfc)
17:32:29 <LouisF> bcafarel: ok thanks
17:33:03 <LouisF> thats all i have
17:33:22 <LouisF> bye all
17:33:38 <bcafarel> bye
17:33:38 <vks1> bye LouisF
17:33:42 <vks1> bye bcafarel
17:33:42 <LouisF> #endmeeting