17:00:13 #startmeeting Solum Team Meeting 17:00:14 Meeting started Tue Jan 19 17:00:13 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is devkulkarni. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:00:15 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:00:17 The meeting name has been set to 'solum_team_meeting' 17:00:23 #topic Roll Call 17:00:27 Devdatta Kulkarni 17:03:30 hi vijendar 17:03:36 devkulkarni: hi 17:03:37 we are in roll call 17:03:44 its just me around here today 17:03:54 I know that ashishjain is out today 17:04:00 he had informed me so 17:04:25 ok 17:04:33 I don't see rahul_sr around today 17:05:19 vijendar: we can continue with the meeting topics 17:05:31 may be others will trickle in 17:05:54 lets wait for 2/3 minutes before I continue 17:05:55 sure 17:06:52 o/ 17:07:27 hi dimtruck 17:07:34 its vijendar and me here 17:07:48 hi dimtruck 17:08:02 Melissa Kam 17:08:02 hi mkam 17:08:07 hi :) 17:08:14 alright.. so we have vijendar, dimtruck, mkam 17:08:22 we can proceed 17:08:40 here is the agenda for today's meeting: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Solum#Agenda_for_2016-01-19_1700_UTC 17:08:59 please take a minute to look through the agenda 17:10:00 alright.. 17:10:06 #topic Announcements 17:10:25 I don't have any announcements. Do any of you have any announcements to make? 17:11:14 none from me 17:11:19 alright 17:11:24 will proceed forward 17:11:32 #topic Review Action Items 17:11:40 there were no action items from last time 17:11:57 so lets proceed to the next topic in which there are several times 17:11:59 items 17:12:15 #topic Blueprint/Bug review and Discussion 17:12:38 Alright.. so in last few days I filed several new bugs 17:12:46 let me go over them 17:13:03 if any one wants to take up any of them that will be awesome 17:13:12 1) LP Handler assumes swift back end 17:13:17 https://bugs.launchpad.net/solum/+bug/1534669 17:13:18 Launchpad bug 1534669 in Solum "lp-handler-delete-method-assumes-swift-backend" [High,New] 17:13:37 so this bug is about modifying the language_pack_handler's delete method 17:14:02 if you look in the code, currently it only has support for removing LPs from swift 17:14:19 there is no support for deleting/removing LPs from glance 17:14:27 and glance is our default backend 17:14:57 so what ends up happening is, when we run functionaltests with the default settings, there are bunch of lps left behind in glance 17:15:24 there is a short term and long term fix for this issue 17:15:51 to fix the functionaltests, we can change the default image_storage from glance to swift 17:15:59 this is the short term solution 17:16:25 in the long term, we want to add support for deleting images from glance 17:16:43 with appropriate check to delete the image from the right backend 17:16:44 I think we should fix this as soon as possible 17:16:51 vijendar: +1 17:17:46 so that is the first bug 17:18:00 next set of bugs are related to functionaltests 17:18:10 2) Bugs related to functional tests (func tests not cleaning up after themselves) 17:18:17 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/solum/+bug/1534222 17:18:17 Launchpad bug 1534222 in Solum "component-func-tests-does-not-clear-image-table" [High,New] 17:18:29 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/solum/+bug/1534189 17:18:29 Launchpad bug 1534189 in Solum "trigger-func-test-not-clearing-plan-image-wf-userlogs-tables" [High,New] 17:18:37 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/solum/+bug/1534183 17:18:37 Launchpad bug 1534183 in Solum "camp-assembly-func-tests-not-clearing-image-table" [Medium,New] 17:19:20 each of these bugs identifies specific functionaltest(s) which are not cleaning up 17:19:26 after the tests are run 17:20:21 mkam: I know you were looking at these.. I am wondering if you could look at the following one first: 17:20:25 https://bugs.launchpad.net/solum/+bug/1534189 17:20:27 Launchpad bug 1534189 in Solum "trigger-func-test-not-clearing-plan-image-wf-userlogs-tables" [High,New] 17:20:36 this one is about trigger endpoint 17:21:03 the other two are for component and assembly, which are camp related tests 17:21:27 okay, will do! 17:21:51 cool, thanks mkam.. I have identified steps to reproduce the issue 17:22:44 ok, the next one is about our devstack vagrant setup 17:22:54 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/solum/+bug/1535448 17:22:55 Launchpad bug 1535448 in Solum "vagrant-with-devstack-plugin" [Medium,New] - Assigned to Dimitry Ushakov (dimalg) 17:23:33 I have assigned this to you dimtruck .. this is not a blocker right now, but it will be good to have the vagrant setup work with the devstack plugin 17:25:33 alright.. the next one is 17:25:41 4) Need to update nova-docker 17:25:45 https://bugs.launchpad.net/solum/+bug/1535796 17:25:46 Launchpad bug 1535796 in Solum "update-nova-docker-driver" [Undecided,New] 17:26:17 Today morning I saw en email on openstack-dev mailing list about changes in nova which will break out-of-tree drivers 17:26:30 the email explicitly called out docker 17:26:33 here is that email: 17:26:47 http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-January/084400.html 17:27:10 since we use nova-docker in our vagrant setup, I am suspecting that we might be affected by this issue 17:27:42 so I have raised the above bug to keep track of the changes that we have to make in the nova-docker fork that we are using in our vagrant setup 17:28:08 devkulkarni: so nova-docker needs a code change, or a config change? 17:28:19 james_li: I think it is code change 17:28:29 so we just track it 17:28:30 ok 17:28:48 I think we will have to make the change in our fork 17:28:51 that is my guess 17:29:24 alright, the last bug is 17:29:33 5) Deploy existing DU image 17:29:39 https://bugs.launchpad.net/solum/+bug/1535462 17:29:40 Launchpad bug 1535462 in Solum "api-to-deploy-created-du-in-swift-glance" [Undecided,New] 17:29:56 This is basically one of the features that we have wanted for a while 17:30:09 to deploy an already built DU image 17:30:35 ashishjain needs this for the POC that he is doing for using Jenkins + Solum 17:30:52 in his POC, he is going to use Jenkins for CI and Solum for CD 17:30:55 should we mark it as high priority? 17:31:02 vijendar: makes sense 17:31:39 btw, here is an etherpad with some thoughts and discussions about how to make this happen 17:31:41 https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/SETnI5nKx9 17:31:58 "this" as in, Jenkins + Solum 17:32:12 please feel free to add thoughts/comments to the etherpad 17:33:50 for ashish's poc, he is targeting internal github 17:35:08 so the above bug is for adding the deploy only endpoint to Solum 17:35:31 please feel free to comment on the bug with any thoughts/comments 17:36:24 sure 17:36:38 alright.. so lots of recent bugs.. ping me on solum irc if you want to discuss more about any of these 17:36:43 #topic API/Service patches needing one more +2 17:36:56 james_li: good that you are around for the meeting today :) 17:37:05 we have several patches that need one more +2 17:37:14 I saw a few patches were merged yesterday 17:37:31 james_li: yes, murali reviewed them in the morning 17:37:35 there are a few more today 17:37:37 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/267181/ 17:37:39 ok 17:37:51 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/267181/ 17:38:34 looking 17:38:47 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/268526/ 17:38:49 cool 17:40:44 and also could you guys review https://review.openstack.org/267182 17:41:21 sure 17:41:42 vijendar: looking 17:42:58 vijendar: lgtm 17:44:10 alright, moving to the next one 17:44:17 Converting functional tests to Tempest plugins 17:44:24 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/264899/ 17:44:37 dimtruck has submitted this patch 17:44:51 dimtruck, I have left a comment for you on the patch 17:45:35 basically when you resubmit the patch, use the bug that I have referenced in the comment 17:48:46 thank you sir 17:48:48 i fwill 17:49:59 thank you dimtruck 17:50:19 ok, the last item before open discussion is 17:50:26 Micro-service architecture spec 17:50:31 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/254729/ 17:50:38 dimtruck: thanks for the review 17:50:41 I have replied to your comments 17:51:41 agree about your question about making distinction between mysql/rabbit etc. and services such as solum-conductor 17:52:26 on the other hand, at a broader-level we can treat mysql/rabbit and solum-conductor in a similar fashion 17:53:20 since both are "services" which will be run (some by constructing the du, some with an already built image (like rabbit)) 17:53:46 need to study how docker-compose and kubernetes define a micro-service 17:54:16 will have some more information for next time 17:54:45 others, please review the micro-service spec and add any thoughts/comments 17:55:01 vijendar: I know you had some thoughts around using heat instead of docker-compose 17:55:12 will be nice if you can add those to the spec 17:55:24 will do 17:55:33 cool, thanks vijendar 17:55:34 that makes sense 17:55:55 cool 17:56:03 ok, opening up for open discussion 17:56:08 #topic Open Discussion 17:56:18 Austin summit 17:56:29 Deadline to submit presentation proposals is Feb 1st 17:56:47 I hope we can submit several proposals 17:57:10 let me know if you need any help with either any feature or putting together the proposal 17:57:28 you can also submit on your own 17:57:32 cool! 17:57:44 just let us all know once you submit, so that we can vote 17:58:15 also, the registration for the summit is now open 17:58:27 i have registered yesterday 17:58:48 hope you all will be able there 17:59:03 i'm registered as well :) 17:59:11 btw, there are low hanging fruit bugs 17:59:17 https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/solum-low-hanging-fruit-bugs 17:59:26 some of these can be knocked off pretty quickly 17:59:44 awesome dimtruck 18:00:06 alright.. its time 18:00:18 thanks dimtruck vijendar james_li mkam for joining today 18:00:25 see you next week 18:00:27 thanks devkulkarni! 18:00:31 #endmeeting