17:00:12 <devkulkarni> #startmeeting Solum Team Meeting
17:00:13 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Mar 29 17:00:12 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is devkulkarni. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
17:00:14 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
17:00:16 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'solum_team_meeting'
17:00:20 <devkulkarni> #topic Roll Call
17:00:26 <devkulkarni> Devdatta Kulkarni
17:02:04 <james_li> james li
17:07:29 <ashishjain> Ashish Jain
17:07:35 <devkulkarni> hi ashishjain
17:07:35 <ashishjain> hi devkulkarni good morning
17:07:36 <devkulkarni> lets wait for few minutes to give others to join
17:07:37 <devkulkarni> here is the agenda for today's meeting: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Solum#Agenda_for_2016-03-29_1700_UTC
17:07:38 <devkulkarni> I think vijendar is out today
17:07:38 <devkulkarni> james_li mentioned earlier on solum irc that he will be joining
17:07:38 <ashishjain> okay
17:07:39 <adrian_otto> o/
17:07:39 <devkulkarni> hi adrian_otto
17:07:39 <adrian_otto> hi
17:07:39 <devkulkarni> we have ashishjain also with us
17:07:39 <devkulkarni> just giving few minutes for folks to join
17:07:39 <ashishjain> hi adrian_otto
17:07:39 <adrian_otto> hi ashishjain
17:07:39 <devkulkarni> here is the agenda for today's meeting: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Solum#Agenda_for_2016-03-29_1700_UTC
17:07:42 <devkulkarni> hi vijendar
17:07:42 <vijendar> sorry for joining late
17:07:42 <vijendar> o/
17:07:46 <devkulkarni> alright .. I think we can get started
17:07:46 <devkulkarni> hi james_li
17:08:04 <james_li> hi devkulkarni
17:08:08 <devkulkarni> #topic Announcements
17:08:14 <devkulkarni> 1) PTL Elections
17:08:23 <devkulkarni> •	PTL election results: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-March/090422.html
17:08:44 <devkulkarni> you can find the results of the PTL election for newton cycle ^^
17:09:16 <devkulkarni> I will be continuing as PTL for our team for Newton cycle
17:09:28 <devkulkarni> we did not have elections this time around
17:09:59 <ashishjain> congratulations devkulkarni for being appointed as PTL for solum
17:10:07 <devkulkarni> thanks ashishjain
17:10:17 <adrian_otto> :-) And there was much rejoicing!!
17:10:22 <devkulkarni> it was because of all of you's support
17:10:29 <devkulkarni> thanks adrian_otto :)
17:11:02 <devkulkarni> I hope we can continue to make our project stronger together in this cycle as well
17:11:13 <devkulkarni> 2) Currently TC candidacy is open
17:11:17 <devkulkarni> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-March/090421.html
17:11:34 <devkulkarni> If any of you want to join the TC, this is your chance
17:11:38 <ashishjain> what is TC candidacy?
17:11:47 <devkulkarni> ashishjain: TC is the technical committee
17:11:56 <ashishjain> TC for solum?
17:11:59 <devkulkarni> it basically oversees all of the openstack
17:12:05 <ashishjain> aah okay
17:12:06 <devkulkarni> no, TC is for the entire openstack
17:12:14 <devkulkarni> it has really broad agenda
17:12:23 <ashishjain> what is the role these guys play?
17:12:27 <ashishjain> okay
17:12:34 <devkulkarni> strategic, long term viability, policy, etc. issues are what is under their purview
17:12:48 <ashishjain> okay
17:13:07 <devkulkarni> ashishjain: it is instructive to read about the position statements of the various candidates
17:13:42 <devkulkarni> it helps to get idea of what are the broad issues that the openstack community is thinking about and what each candidate is planning to resolve/address those
17:14:00 <devkulkarni> 3) Devstack gate is broken
17:14:05 <devkulkarni> https://bugs.launchpad.net/solum/+bug/1563019
17:14:05 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1563019 in Solum "devstack-gate-failure-due-to-screen-n-dhcp-log-not-found" [Critical,New] - Assigned to Devdatta Kulkarni (devdatta-kulkarni)
17:14:13 <devkulkarni> Yet another gate failure
17:14:44 <devkulkarni> let me talk about this more when we discuss bugs and reviews
17:14:57 <devkulkarni> 4) Austin summit tracks
17:15:02 <devkulkarni> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-March/090606.html
17:15:10 <devkulkarni> Solum Fishbowl session: April 28, Thursday, 4:10 - 4:50
17:15:15 <devkulkarni> Solum Work room: April 28, Thursday, 5:00 - 5:40
17:15:21 <devkulkarni> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160328/23a406bf/attachment.pdf
17:15:42 <devkulkarni> the organizing committee sent out the track and space allocation couple of days back
17:15:53 <devkulkarni> we have got one fishbowl and one work room session
17:16:02 <devkulkarni> both are back-to-back on Thursday
17:16:06 <james_li> 👍
17:16:10 <devkulkarni> yep
17:16:11 <adrian_otto> do you have plans for what to discuss?
17:16:31 <devkulkarni> adrian_otto: sort of.. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/solum-austin-summit-planning
17:16:38 <devkulkarni> we started creating etherpad
17:17:17 <devkulkarni> all, please add to the etherpad any/all items that you think are important for us to address as a team
17:17:51 <devkulkarni> ashishjain: I think our presentation is also on Thursday, right?
17:17:59 <ashishjain> yes
17:18:03 <ashishjain> 9:00 AM
17:18:10 <devkulkarni> so thursday is going to be hectic
17:18:46 <devkulkarni> we can discuss more about the summit in the open discussion
17:19:15 <devkulkarni> do any team members have any announcements to make?
17:20:00 <devkulkarni> alright, let continue to the next topic
17:20:12 <devkulkarni> #topic Review Action Items
17:20:23 <devkulkarni> (done) devkulkarni to tag Mitaka release: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/296032/
17:20:36 <devkulkarni> the patch has been merged
17:21:04 <devkulkarni> there are two other patches that probably need to be merged this week
17:21:09 <devkulkarni> these are solum patches
17:21:25 <devkulkarni> lets talk about those next
17:21:38 <devkulkarni> #topic Patches for Review
17:22:11 <devkulkarni> We have two patches in our queue that are related to the mitaka release
17:22:14 <devkulkarni> - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/296644/
17:22:23 <devkulkarni> - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/296643/
17:22:38 <devkulkarni> both these patches are currently failing on the devstack gate
17:22:57 <devkulkarni> I spent yesterday trying to figure out the issue and a workaround
17:23:24 <devkulkarni> here is a bug report about this:
17:23:37 <devkulkarni> https://bugs.launchpad.net/solum/+bug/1563019
17:23:37 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1563019 in Solum "devstack-gate-failure-due-to-screen-n-dhcp-log-not-found" [Critical,New] - Assigned to Devdatta Kulkarni (devdatta-kulkarni)
17:23:48 <devkulkarni> at a high-level the issue is this
17:24:25 <devkulkarni> the gate script tries to upload log file for screen-n-dhcp.txt but that file is not available
17:24:44 <devkulkarni> so it gets FileNotFoundException
17:24:59 <devkulkarni> The issue seems to be that the screen-n-dhcp.txt file is not created and the Jenkins plugin code that uploads all the log files to logs.openstack.org fails.
17:25:06 <devkulkarni> Most possible cause of this issue might be that the plugin code started doing strict checking for file existence since earlier too there used to be no screen-n-dhcp.txt generated but it was not a problem. For instance, check the following logs from a merged patch
17:25:20 <devkulkarni> http://logs.openstack.org/40/293640/6/check/gate-solum-devstack-dsvm/dd0b1f5/logs/
17:25:24 <devkulkarni> (merged) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/293640/
17:25:36 <devkulkarni> If you look, screen-n-dhcp.txt is empty file. But this seemed to be not an issue then.
17:26:08 <devkulkarni> that caused me to conclude that may be something changed in the Jenkins plugin code which is causing the gate failure.
17:26:34 <devkulkarni> As a workaround, following approaches were tried:
17:26:34 <devkulkarni> - enabling n-dhcp service via settings file in the Solum devstack plugin. The idea here was that if we enable n-dhcp, may be it will generate the corresponding log file. But this did not work.
17:26:49 <devkulkarni> - create a dummy screen-n-dhcp file with some dummy content in the post_test_hook. This seem to work as seen in the following patch:
17:27:10 <devkulkarni> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/298342/5
17:27:22 <devkulkarni> this approach seems to work
17:27:34 <devkulkarni> so here is the question for us
17:28:45 <devkulkarni> should we move forward with this workaround to unblock the mitaka release related patches? in parallel we can reach out to folks from the devstack team and suggest a solution
17:28:57 <adrian_otto> is this a devstack bug, or a solum issue? Why do we care about dhcp?
17:29:09 <devkulkarni> exactly
17:29:16 <devkulkarni> this seems like a devstack bug to me
17:29:23 <devkulkarni> I looked into the code of devstack
17:29:27 <adrian_otto> talk to the devstack team and see what they say
17:30:29 <devkulkarni> yeah, I was planning to do that.. in the mean time, what should we do with the workaround?
17:30:44 <devkulkarni> may be we can take a call on that afterwards?
17:31:00 <devkulkarni> I am just worried that the mitaka deadline is this week
17:31:22 <devkulkarni> and there are two patches related to that which we probably need to get merged
17:32:22 <vijendar> devkulkarni: let's check with devstack team first, if they don't have any fix/workaround, probably we can go ahead with our workaround for now?
17:32:39 <devkulkarni> ok
17:32:44 <devkulkarni> lets do that
17:32:54 <devkulkarni> I will reach out to them
17:33:18 <devkulkarni> apart from that there are no new patches to review
17:33:32 <devkulkarni> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/solum+status:open,n,z
17:34:27 <devkulkarni> #topic Bug review
17:34:34 <devkulkarni> New Bugs
17:34:44 <devkulkarni> https://bugs.launchpad.net/solum/+bug/1558152
17:34:44 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1558152 in Solum "detailed-log-message-in-solum-deployer" [Undecided,New]
17:35:19 <devkulkarni> this one is about capturing more detailed output in deployer log
17:35:45 <devkulkarni> anyone wants to take this up?
17:36:34 <vijendar> devkulkarni: I can take
17:36:47 <devkulkarni> cool
17:36:53 <devkulkarni> thanks vijendar
17:37:26 <devkulkarni> are there any other new bugs that you have in mind? (which you are planning to register but have not yet?)
17:38:04 <devkulkarni> this is our current bug list: https://bugs.launchpad.net/solum/
17:38:24 <devkulkarni> if you sort by Age you should see the latest bugs
17:38:36 <vijendar> there seems to be a bug with scaling
17:38:47 <devkulkarni> vijendar: oh okay
17:38:55 <vijendar> devkulkarni: is there any bug on that already?
17:39:06 <devkulkarni> vijendar: no, there is not. can you add it?
17:39:29 <vijendar> devkulkarni: sure. will do that
17:39:41 <devkulkarni> cool, sounds good
17:40:07 <devkulkarni> alright, lets move to open discussion
17:40:15 <devkulkarni> #topic Open Discussion
17:40:22 <devkulkarni> Austin summit planning
17:40:27 <devkulkarni> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/solum-austin-summit-planning
17:40:51 <adrian_otto> I put some suggestions in there
17:40:57 <devkulkarni> yes, saw those
17:41:07 <devkulkarni> good suggestions about the demo
17:41:18 <devkulkarni> and identifying mitaka specific things
17:42:12 <devkulkarni> for demo, we were thinking of demoing the current capabilities with may be rax specific work that vijendar has done of integration with carina/magnum
17:42:41 <devkulkarni> also, ashishjain has worked on integrating jenkins for ci and solum for cd
17:42:52 <devkulkarni> that can also be demoed probably
17:43:51 <devkulkarni> we also have a contributor who is not here today, but she was looking at our horizon plugin
17:44:16 <devkulkarni> if that work moves forward to an extent where it can be demo-able then that is another option
17:44:37 <devkulkarni> of course we have our cli with the new 'app' and 'workflow' models
17:44:59 <devkulkarni> I don't remember if we have demoed that in Tokyo.. probably not
17:45:55 <devkulkarni> ashishjain: on the etherpad you have added 'multinode deployment'
17:46:12 <ashishjain> yes devkulkarni
17:46:18 <devkulkarni> if you look at the item number 1 — 'Support for multi-container apps'
17:46:30 <devkulkarni> is that what you had in mind?
17:46:33 <ashishjain> no
17:46:38 <devkulkarni> oh wait
17:46:45 <ashishjain> basically installation of solum on multinode
17:46:49 <devkulkarni> you are actually saying deploying solum on multiple nodes
17:46:52 <devkulkarni> yep, got it
17:46:53 <ashishjain> yes
17:46:59 <devkulkarni> yeah, that will be useful
17:47:29 <devkulkarni> we should pull in dimtruck in that discussion if he is available
17:48:45 <devkulkarni> vijendar, james_li: do you have any items in mind that we should cover during our work room session?
17:49:41 <vijendar> one thing that I was thinking was about horizon UI for solum
17:50:16 <devkulkarni> vijendar: it is item number 3 on the etherpad
17:50:24 <devkulkarni> you can +1 it
17:50:25 <vijendar> devkulkarni: ok..cool
17:50:38 <vijendar> sure
17:50:54 <devkulkarni> thanks :)
17:51:45 <devkulkarni> ashishjain: do you think you might be able to provide updates on the kolla-based deployment that was being worked on by one of your colleague?
17:51:53 <devkulkarni> not today, but during the summit
17:52:33 <ashishjain> devkulkarni, that colleague is no longer with the org
17:52:40 <devkulkarni> ashishjain: oh ok
17:52:59 <ashishjain> its been quite a while since he quit
17:53:06 <devkulkarni> ashishjain: was there any work that we can probably use?
17:53:10 <devkulkarni> hmm I see
17:53:58 <devkulkarni> there was a discussion thread upstream on projects trying kolla based deployments
17:54:45 <devkulkarni> I guess that's alright.. if there is some work that we can use, that would be awesome
17:55:14 <devkulkarni> but if not, and if there is no immediate interest from the team on it, then we can postpone it for some later cycle
17:56:36 <ashishjain> I doubt if there was any progress made on it
17:56:52 <ashishjain> So we will have to start afresh on that
17:57:03 <devkulkarni> hmm I see.. that's fine I guess
17:57:41 <devkulkarni> if there is any interest from your group and someone is available to move it forward, we can work with them
17:58:08 <ashishjain> sure will let you know
17:58:19 <devkulkarni> cool, sounds good ashishjain
17:58:29 <devkulkarni> is there anything else that we should discuss today?
17:58:36 <devkulkarni> we are almost at the end of our meeting time
18:00:03 <devkulkarni> alright then
18:00:14 <devkulkarni> thanks everyone for attending the meeting today
18:00:17 <devkulkarni> #endmeeting