21:04:20 <tonyb> #startmeeting stable
21:04:21 <openstack> Meeting started Mon Jun 20 21:04:20 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is tonyb. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
21:04:21 <sigmavirus24> It's moving here
21:04:23 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
21:04:23 * dhellmann notes that the location of the stable meeting is unstable
21:04:23 <sigmavirus24> :D
21:04:26 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'stable'
21:04:30 <tonyb> #topic roll call
21:04:30 <sigmavirus24> dhellmann: no joke
21:04:33 <mriedem> o/
21:04:41 <sigmavirus24> yolo #startmeeting is here ;)
21:04:51 <sigmavirus24> (that's me fwiw)
21:04:53 <tonyb> So all of mt irssi windows got renumbered yesterday
21:05:18 <dhellmann> o/
21:05:23 <tonyb> dhellmann: my co-workers call me the (un)stable PTL
21:05:29 <sigmavirus24> tonyb: we do?
21:05:39 <tonyb> sigmavirus24: Well the auusie ones at least
21:05:43 <sigmavirus24> fair
21:05:55 <sigmavirus24> y'all talk upside down so we can't understand you
21:05:59 <tonyb> #topic status
21:06:34 <tonyb> sigmavirus24: Thanks for looking at the periodic failures and poking emailing a call-for action
21:06:55 * tonyb needs to curate the stable-tracker etherpad
21:07:18 <sigmavirus24> tonyb: you're welcome. THere was a bunch of POST_FAILURE spam this weekend that I ignored, though, so some may have slipped through
21:07:28 <tonyb> all the periodic jobs failed yesterday so that's not a good data point
21:08:00 <sigmavirus24> right
21:08:16 <tonyb> sigmavirus24: #link http://status.openstack.org/openstack-health/#/g/build_queue/periodic-stable
21:08:44 <mriedem> yeah so ceilometer,
21:08:56 <tonyb> magnum are havign issues with the liberty gate but we're working on that in os-dev
21:09:03 <mriedem> i think that's still the oslo.* uncapped dep that is breaking ceilometer on liberty
21:09:51 <mriedem> so maybe it's time for a dev list thread on that one
21:09:59 <mriedem> i brought it up with jd a few weeks ago
21:10:11 <tonyb> mriedem: Hmm okay I thought that was "fixed"  I'll look into it today and follow-up on  list
21:11:26 <tonyb> So things are within "normal" but tending towards broken because of other distractions
21:11:38 <mriedem> looks like manila in liberty is failing for the same reason ceilometer is
21:11:41 <tonyb> anything else for status?
21:12:55 <mriedem> nope
21:13:33 <tonyb> #topic action items
21:13:58 <tonyb> there is only one .... remove most os the kilo references in project-config
21:14:12 <mriedem> yeah, so that's a bit gorpy
21:14:14 <tonyb> I think that's "blocked" on the kilo-eol tags IIUC
21:14:22 <mriedem> more or less yeah
21:14:44 <mriedem> i could make a first pass probably on the major known projects and jobs, but i'm just not sure about everything
21:15:06 <tonyb> mriedem: if you push what you have as WIP I can tak over it
21:15:33 <dhellmann> we could use some reviews on this update to the project team guide: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/322273
21:15:33 <mriedem> i have 0
21:15:35 <sigmavirus24> Let me know if I can help too
21:15:48 * tonyb imagines a script to take look at the eol_repos and compare them to layout.yaml and then massage an re's in there
21:15:59 <tonyb> mriedem: okay I'll write the script
21:16:10 <tonyb> this is something we can at least get a robot to do 90% of
21:16:49 <tonyb> ZOMG I can make the scrip check for kilo-eol and only tehn update layout ....
21:16:58 <tonyb> anyway ....
21:17:09 <tonyb> #topic release news
21:17:21 <tonyb> kilo is on the way out
21:17:33 <tonyb> see the conversation in -stable for details.
21:17:54 <tonyb> fungi is will ook at it when time allows
21:18:09 <tonyb> I'll write some "stuff" to refine the process for next cycle
21:18:23 <fungi> yep, or may be able to convince another gerrit admin to whitewash that fence
21:18:43 <mriedem> i sense a huck finn reference in here
21:18:45 <tonyb> Oh and I *still* need to email PTLs to release from stable branches
21:19:00 <dhellmann> tonyb : I can include that in my release countdown email this week if you want
21:19:00 <sigmavirus24> I'm not an admin, but whitewashing sure sounds fun, fungi!
21:19:02 <tonyb> fungi: is jhesketh one of those?
21:19:11 <fungi> tonyb: yep
21:19:32 <tonyb> fungi: if you don't object I'll poke him to see if he has time
21:19:38 <fungi> sigmavirus24: fun _and_ thankless! ;)
21:19:42 <fungi> tonyb: go for it
21:19:42 <tonyb> fungi: I can work with him to script it
21:19:47 <tonyb> \o/
21:20:28 <tonyb> dhellmann: Thanks. That'd be good.
21:20:35 <dhellmann> tonyb : noted
21:20:44 <sigmavirus24> fungi: try being the PSF election administrator ;)
21:20:54 <fungi> sigmavirus24: hrm, no thanks! ;)
21:21:02 <tonyb> :)
21:21:24 <fungi> sigmavirus24: presumably even worse than administating our elections
21:21:33 <fungi> er, administrating
21:21:43 <sigmavirus24> I fear I've caught tonyb's attention ;)
21:21:48 <tonyb> fungi: ours aren't *that* bad ... well that bits I do anyway
21:21:51 <sigmavirus24> I shouldn't say any more :P
21:21:57 <tonyb> sigmavirus24: Umm yeah you kinda did ;P
21:22:01 * sigmavirus24 best hide before being voluntold
21:22:25 <tonyb> skipping the tagging as there isn't anything to talk about
21:22:33 <tonyb> #topic stuck reviews?
21:22:44 <tonyb> anything there ... nothgin on the agenda
21:23:20 <tonyb> #topic open discussion?
21:23:39 <tonyb> #undo
21:23:40 <openstack> Removing item from minutes: <ircmeeting.items.Topic object at 0x7fc2af112050>
21:23:42 <tonyb> #topic tooling
21:23:58 <tonyb> stable: document the 'proactive' backporting workflow -- https://review.openstack.org/#/c/322273/
21:24:13 <tonyb> mriedem: please take a look at that
21:24:29 <tonyb> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/322273/
21:24:46 <tonyb> others are very welcome to review as well
21:25:08 <tonyb> #topic open discussion
21:25:15 <tonyb> anything?
21:26:19 <tonyb> going once ....
21:26:48 <tonyb> going twice ....
21:27:16 <tonyb> Thanks everyone
21:27:20 <tonyb> #endmeeting