#openstack-meeting: state-management
Meeting started by harlowja at 20:00:46 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
-
- https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/StateManagement#Previous_meetings
(harlowja,
20:01:48)
- https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/StateManagement#Agenda_for_next_meeting
(harlowja,
20:02:16)
- where-everyone-is-at (harlowja, 20:02:56)
- https://review.openstack.org/#/c/29862/
(patch set 8) (harlowja,
20:04:45)
- https://launchpad.net/~taskflow-dev
and https://launchpad.net/taskflow (jlucci,
20:06:29)
- https://review.openstack.org/#/c/32036/
(jlucci,
20:07:31)
- https://review.openstack.org/#/c/32036/
(harlowja,
20:07:39)
- launchpad (harlowja, 20:08:23)
- https://launchpad.net/taskflow
(harlowja,
20:08:57)
- ACTION: harlowja
investigate dev openness (harlowja,
20:11:20)
- stackforge (harlowja, 20:12:54)
- https://github.com/stackforge/taskflow
(harlowja,
20:13:06)
- fsm-pattern (harlowja, 20:19:08)
- https://review.openstack.org/#/c/32036/
This contains the entirety of the distributed code right now (jlucci,
20:27:20)
- https://review.openstack.org/#/c/32036/1/taskflow/distributed/DTClient.py
(jlucci,
20:27:36)
- https://review.openstack.org/#/c/32036/1/taskflow/patterns/distributed_flow.py
(jlucci,
20:27:56)
- https://review.openstack.org/#/c/32036/1/taskflow/tests/unit/test_distributed_flow.py
(jlucci,
20:28:31)
- ACTION: jlucci think
about how taskflow decorator/task object can be translated in the
distriubted_flow pattern to something that celery can use (thus not
exposing celery to everyone) (harlowja,
20:38:23)
- ACTION: bug josh if
it makes no sense (harlowja,
20:38:51)
- cinder/nova integration (harlowja, 20:42:31)
- https://review.openstack.org/#/c/29862/
(harlowja,
20:42:48)
- ACTION: jlucci get
overview of heat co-routine and report back? (harlowja,
20:55:37)
- ACTION: alexheneveld
get sam corbett from our side to give you chapter and verse
:) (alexheneveld,
20:56:29)
- action-items-that-should-of-been-done-at-the-start (harlowja, 20:57:29)
- https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StructuredWorkflowLocks#Databases
(harlowja,
20:59:37)
- ACTION: drian_otto to
update wiki with Galera as a SQL option (adrian_otto,
21:00:05)
- ACTION: adrian_otto
to update wiki with Galera as a SQL option (harlowja,
21:00:14)
Meeting ended at 21:00:23 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- harlowja investigate dev openness
- jlucci think about how taskflow decorator/task object can be translated in the distriubted_flow pattern to something that celery can use (thus not exposing celery to everyone)
- bug josh if it makes no sense
- jlucci get overview of heat co-routine and report back?
- alexheneveld get sam corbett from our side to give you chapter and verse :)
- drian_otto to update wiki with Galera as a SQL option
- adrian_otto to update wiki with Galera as a SQL option
Action items, by person
- adrian_otto
- adrian_otto to update wiki with Galera as a SQL option
- alexheneveld
- alexheneveld get sam corbett from our side to give you chapter and verse :)
- harlowja
- harlowja investigate dev openness
- jlucci
- jlucci think about how taskflow decorator/task object can be translated in the distriubted_flow pattern to something that celery can use (thus not exposing celery to everyone)
- jlucci get overview of heat co-routine and report back?
- UNASSIGNED
- bug josh if it makes no sense
- drian_otto to update wiki with Galera as a SQL option
People present (lines said)
- harlowja (143)
- jlucci (41)
- adrian_otto (30)
- hemna (16)
- randallburt (13)
- kebray (10)
- alexheneveld (9)
- changbl (6)
- openstack (3)
- devananda (2)
- kchenweijie (2)
- dansmith (1)
- uvirtbot (1)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.