15:00:22 #startmeeting storyboard 15:00:22 NIGHT OR DAY 15:00:23 Meeting started Wed Mar 9 15:00:22 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is SotK. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:24 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:00:26 The meeting name has been set to 'storyboard' 15:00:39 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/StoryBoard Agenda 15:01:19 I don't know of any announcements or urgent items, so unless there is dissent we'll go straight to in progress work! 15:01:57 fine by me 15:02:03 #topic In Progress Work 15:02:24 o/ 15:02:26 #info SotK is working on "automatic worklists" 15:02:29 hey betherly 15:02:48 automatic worklists are going pretty well, they're working now 15:02:48 hi betherly! glad you could make it! :) 15:02:53 yayyyyyyy 15:03:00 I'm so happy automatic worklists are working at last! 15:03:05 just working on getting the UI sort of presentable 15:03:05 they've been a far-off dream for so long 15:03:21 then I'll write a UI that allows lanes in boards to be automatically populated 15:03:32 (but they won't be reorderable) 15:03:32 okay, are you going to send the first bit to gerrit in between? 15:03:36 yes 15:03:38 cool 15:03:58 and yeah, agree, if people wanna reorder auto lanes, deal with it when it comes 15:05:27 can I get an eta on anything? 15:06:14 auto worklists patches - this evening or maybe tomorrow if I get too hungry 15:06:38 boards - hopefully by the end of the week, maybe early next week (not expecting this to be too difficult) 15:06:52 I laughed out loud at 'if I get too hungry' 15:06:58 I'm adding 2 weeks to your boards estimate 15:07:08 :P 15:07:57 I'm excited, anyway! 15:09:46 * SotK too 15:10:03 * SotK wonders what else is in progress 15:10:13 (don't wear yourself out; aiui you're working late on thurs anyway) 15:10:25 er, well, according to agenda, I'm working on serach 15:10:28 *search 15:10:41 but in practice, that's been parked this week while I've been reviewing 15:11:09 and also because much of the automatic worklists work overlaps with search/filter 15:11:26 I did rework https://review.openstack.org/#/c/279204/ 15:11:32 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/279204/ 15:11:51 so that now removes the button except on mobiles 15:12:09 where it moves to the top right, and hopefully the formatting is neat this time 15:12:19 #info Zara reworked a tiny search patch 15:12:29 * SotK will test it when he's made things automatic 15:12:35 :D 15:13:02 yeah, that's my other reason for not getting too into it; if I upload wip stuff, nobody's free to review in detail 15:13:19 other things... 15:13:48 I've started looking at task-metadata again, because UI for task-links wasn't loved 15:14:04 as it required removing 'priority' button 15:14:21 and also doesn't really use everything to its full potential 15:14:34 by which I mean, task 'links' are the same in the back end as story descriptions 15:14:50 meaning you could also use them to comment directly on tasks, paste multiple links, etc 15:15:10 so now I'd rather do it as a button that opens a modal, even though I'd rather get to a link with 1 click than two 15:15:23 if it gets really irritating, we'll separate it out somehow, I guess 15:15:52 #info Zara has been working on a modal for task metadata in the story view 15:16:38 let me know if you're blocked and I may pester you if I'm stuck; I don't want to hold anything up on the automatic boards/worklists side 15:17:17 so far I have a modal that can't show anything, a really weird button to link to it, and a close button that doesn't work 15:17:24 ~just another wednesday~ 15:17:29 better than nothing at all :D 15:17:45 hahaha, easy to say when you haven't seen it! :D 15:18:08 but yeah, it should be cool once it works 15:18:32 I think I'll have to rewrite the back end patches so that they refer to 'metadata' instead of 'links' 15:18:54 not sure whether I should call everything links first, then rewrite, or make things inconsistent, then rewrite 15:19:21 * SotK would probably go for the second option 15:19:42 okay 15:19:49 figured I might as well ask now 15:19:56 alternative is to just change all the backend patches first 15:19:57 but 15:20:00 that is procrastinating 15:20:32 so yeah, sorry, been distracted by meetings and bad network this week, not done as much developing as I'd like 15:20:42 END OF LONG SUMMARY 15:20:51 that's me done 15:21:14 any other in progress stuff? 15:21:35 er, your comments stuff 15:21:37 I guess 15:21:57 oh yeah 15:22:08 I made a quote button which is merged 15:22:15 I made a permalink button that doesn't work 15:22:22 I'll try to make it work at some point 15:22:43 I made a patch to support threading in the backend 15:22:48 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/288997/ 15:22:58 supporting it in the frontend will be more complex though 15:23:30 hah, still, nice to merge it so we don't have to dig it up later 15:23:36 indeed 15:23:38 if anyone wants to take a glance at that 15:23:55 I also sent a patch to allow worklists and boards to be browsed by story and/or task id 15:24:20 oh yeah, merge conflict currently 15:24:29 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/288910/ 15:24:31 which makes it possible to show a list of boards/worklists containing a story on the story detail view 15:24:32 * persia is very excited about that one 15:24:41 (same for tasks) 15:25:07 does anyone know what the conflict is? 15:25:25 I am interested but haven't looked at it yet because of the conflict. 15:25:27 yeah, we merged the archive cards thing 15:25:41 so the patch doesn't apply cleanly 15:25:47 I'll fix it up when I get home 15:26:08 okay, please try not to die under a mountain of work 15:26:17 * SotK does his best 15:26:28 if there's stuff I can help with, shout 15:26:54 and I will run away-- I mean, I'll see what I can do 15:27:01 :D 15:27:55 Anything else? 15:28:27 nothing here 15:28:34 betherly? 15:29:23 looking into d3 and angular graphs and experimenting but nothing solid to push yet :) 15:30:09 sounds promising :) 15:30:12 sounds exciting :) feel free to share weird WIP stuff or whatever (though I don't know how easy that is to do) 15:32:28 * SotK guesses we can safely move on now 15:32:28 :) 15:33:17 #topic Infra Email Config 15:33:33 It seems one of the patches was -1'd pending documentation 15:33:33 yeah, I left it in there because it's still waiting, don't have much to add 15:33:36 yeah 15:33:54 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/270331/ 15:34:59 if there's nothing to add, then we'll carry on :) 15:35:14 well, I was gonna say that, given that infra are so overloaded that it takes a month to update the patches as-they-are, I think we should assume we won't be surprised with comprehensive docs soon. 15:35:29 * SotK also assumes that 15:35:33 who are you waiting for for docs? 15:35:53 are you waiting for someone to write docs or review a docs patch? 15:36:13 anteaya: jeblair was asked to document the structure used in one of the patches he's written so far 15:36:23 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/270331/ 15:36:25 that one 15:37:07 did he agree to document the structure? 15:37:31 no, there's been no update agreeing or disagreeing as far as I know 15:38:09 so I don't know that the -1 has stopped anyone from merging the patch as-is, but nobody had merged it before that 15:38:46 oh, sorry, I linked the wrong one 15:38:47 hang on 15:39:05 so on 331 I suggest fixing the error and submitting a new patch 15:39:16 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/270329/ 15:39:20 it has been several weeks 15:39:54 oh, ha 15:39:58 i'm not going to document that 15:40:02 http://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/index.html 15:40:03 there's jeblair 15:40:04 exim has a manual 15:40:10 i'm not sure why i would rewrite it 15:40:14 hi! :) ha, thanks for clarifying that. 15:40:28 jeblair: can you add a comment to 270329 stating that for nibalizer's benefit? 15:40:45 i did 15:40:53 wonderful thank yoi 15:41:04 thanks jeblair 15:41:05 sorry I was slow 15:41:46 yes, thank you for that. :) appreciate you going out of your way to help like this, fwiw. 15:42:04 so maybe someone can bring that comment to nibalizer's attention and perhaps he can re-review 15:43:27 im about 15:43:49 phew, I was about to mention it in #infra but didn't want to spam if you got gerrit notifications! :) 15:44:20 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/270329/ 15:44:27 has just been updated in reference to -1 15:45:42 thanks, everyone :) 15:45:51 mordred just approved it 15:45:55 thanks mordred 15:46:01 thanks folks :) 15:46:56 #topic Public Test Instance 15:47:30 so, I resurrected the frankenstoryboard at http://storyboard.sotk.co.uk/ 15:47:50 * SotK has no idea what branches that is running, since I did it about 5 minutes before the meeting 15:48:01 * Zara peers at SotK 15:48:07 we probably need a better long-term solution I'd guess 15:48:08 oh this is the storyboard used to have a test instance under infra and doesn't anymore, right? 15:48:32 I don't know if it ever actually had a test instance under infra 15:48:41 yeah, this one was never under infra, at least 15:49:00 was there never a storyboard-dev? 15:49:09 I don't know. 15:49:15 I had thought we had a conversation and I thought I recall you saying so 15:49:19 I think there was plans for one, but there was never one that I saw 15:49:20 doesn't matter 15:49:29 I don't know as there are plans 15:49:36 but I think there should be plans 15:49:52 yeah, I would have been referring to this if I talked about a public dev instance, but it's not the same as a storyboard-dev under infra, so sorry if I caused any confusion there 15:49:53 * SotK thinks so too 15:49:56 to that end, how do folks feel if someone creates a spec for a storyboard-dev server 15:50:06 and offers that up to infra 15:50:24 Zara: I probably mis-remembered 15:51:45 :) there's a chance there's already a spec somewhere, if it's something that needs a spec. There is a story for it somewhere... 15:51:48 did I take this topic in a direction other than what folks intended? 15:52:18 I'm not sure either of us will get on to writing a spec unless we already have a clear idea of what should be in it, which might be going in a circle? 15:52:29 mostly I'm saying I don't think infra knows storyboard wants a dev instance, so a spec is a good way to communicate that 15:52:56 Zara: can you start an etherpad with a spec draft and I can help fill it out? 15:53:05 you or SotK 15:53:30 anteaya: yes, we can, though we might not be able to put much thought in until next week 15:53:40 so a very drafty draft, yes 15:53:51 next week is fine 15:53:57 drafty drafts are fine 15:54:09 I just think it is a way forward for infra to know you want this 15:54:14 if indeed you do want this 15:54:22 sorry if I'm putting words in your mouth 15:54:34 * SotK believes we do want this 15:54:40 oh good 15:54:42 I want this anyway xD 15:54:45 cool 15:54:55 so whatever works for you 15:55:05 and pull me in so I can do the things I said I will do 15:55:33 okay. :) I do want this, I just also can't promise I'll have time to do this and things I've already committed to. 15:55:40 fair enough 15:55:46 until next week, but if that's fine then that's fine! :D 15:55:51 5 minutes left btw 15:56:01 SotK: do you think we will get to open discussion? I have an item for open discussion 15:56:09 Zara: that's fine 15:56:20 if we're done on this topic, then yes, briefly :) 15:56:42 I think we've reached consensus now anyway 15:57:02 #topic Open Discussion 15:57:08 o/ 15:57:13 go ahead anteaya 15:57:16 thanks 15:57:25 who is going to be attending summit in Austin? 15:57:43 * anteaya looks at Zara and SotK 15:57:46 :) 15:57:49 this we do not know yet, should know by the end of the week 15:57:53 we've been lax in organising things 15:57:59 keep me posted please 15:58:01 okay 15:58:05 you have your summit passes, yes? 15:58:15 I do 15:58:17 I also do 15:58:21 good 15:58:31 then it is just a matter of flights and hotels 15:58:39 yup 15:58:41 great, so when you know let me know 15:58:48 will do :) 15:58:51 Hi 15:58:51 I'm looking forward to seeing you both, if possible 15:58:53 thanks 15:58:57 that's all I had 15:59:02 yw, looking forward to seeing you, too! :) 15:59:06 :) 15:59:11 +1 15:59:25 1 minute left... if there's anything else, I guess -> #storyboard 15:59:33 * SotK agrees 15:59:41 thanks for your time everyone :) 15:59:47 #endmeeting