19:09:28 <SotK> #startmeeting storyboard
19:09:29 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Mar  6 19:09:28 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is SotK. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
19:09:30 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
19:09:32 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'storyboard'
19:09:43 <mkarray> o/
19:10:18 <SotK> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/StoryBoard Agenda
19:10:19 <diablo_rojo> o/
19:10:36 <SotK> #topic Announcements
19:10:49 <SotK> I don't have anything here, anyone else?
19:11:26 <diablo_rojo> Nope
19:11:48 <mkarray> nope
19:12:16 <SotK> #topic Migration Updates
19:13:29 <diablo_rojo> So Placement is a thing in sb now :)
19:13:32 <diablo_rojo> Which is cool.
19:13:41 <fungi> EduUrban06 is privmsg'ing me right now about problems he's encountering trying to set up a local sb instance to work on the bp migration feature
19:13:42 <diablo_rojo> They are still allowing bps in lp until Train starts
19:14:58 <SotK> nice :D
19:15:10 <diablo_rojo> fungi, just sent him https://docs.openstack.org/infra/storyboard/migration.html
19:15:28 <fungi> yeah, i linked him to that as well
19:15:40 <diablo_rojo> Oh cool.
19:15:44 <diablo_rojo> Way ahead of me then
19:15:45 <fungi> he's running into differences with mysql installation
19:15:55 <diablo_rojo> Ahh got it.
19:17:22 <SotK> I think Zara mentioned some unusual mysql installation trouble in the review for the docs patch I sent a few weeks ago, probably worth debugging in-channel
19:17:42 <clarkb> I got mysql working locally
19:18:03 <clarkb> I apt-get installed' the bindep pacakge listing then started mysql and postgres because I was runnign in a container
19:18:15 <clarkb> then I had to run tools/test-setup.sh for the unittests
19:19:15 <clarkb> I expect that would also work for regular runs if you use the test db
19:19:32 <clarkb> this was on ubuntu bionic fwiw
19:20:05 <ivy> I did same as clarkb and mysql works locally for me too
19:20:55 <SotK> any further migration updates?
19:21:33 <fungi> yeah, i think the developer setup instructions are somewhat out of sync with the contributor documentation
19:21:40 <fungi> and that's part of the confusion
19:21:51 <fungi> clarkb updated the latter
19:22:02 <fungi> EduUrban06 was trying to follow the former
19:22:44 <diablo_rojo> Ahhh okay. Maybe we can merge the two or simplify one and move other info from one to the other.
19:23:50 <fungi> sounds like a good idea
19:23:53 <SotK> +1
19:24:09 <diablo_rojo> I can probably take that todo.
19:24:21 <SotK> thank you
19:24:31 <fungi> thanks diablo_rojo!
19:24:46 * diablo_rojo writes post it
19:25:05 <fungi> classic yellow or fancy colored?
19:25:26 <fungi> (these things matter)
19:25:30 <diablo_rojo> Classic yellow currently
19:25:44 <diablo_rojo> I just finished a pad of classic yellow with lines
19:26:02 <fungi> sounds very advanced
19:27:44 <SotK> #topic Story Attachments
19:28:01 <SotK> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+topic:story-attachments Patches
19:29:06 <SotK> this is getting towards being ready I think, its currently waiting on mordred to finish https://review.openstack.org/#/c/639760/ and then a rework to use openstack-sdk instead of python-swiftclient
19:29:15 <mordred> ++
19:29:23 * mordred will finish that RSN
19:29:40 <SotK> it also needs support for not displaying the attachments UI if attachments are disabled, but we can merge the API patches before I get round to that if need be
19:29:41 <SotK> thanks :)
19:30:53 <fungi> yeah, i had prioritized reviewing the api patches first for that reason
19:31:46 <diablo_rojo> Yeah.
19:32:40 <diablo_rojo> Figured waiting on the webclient patches till all the sb repo stuff got it wasn't a bad idea
19:33:00 <SotK> indeed
19:33:25 <SotK> anything else to raise about attachments?
19:33:44 <diablo_rojo> I dont think so?
19:34:08 <SotK> #topic Outreachy
19:37:06 <diablo_rojo> There are now two proposals out on their site
19:37:12 <diablo_rojo> one for SQL stuff
19:37:24 <diablo_rojo> and one for Searching Syntax improvements
19:37:45 * diablo_rojo looks at mkarray and nudges him towards the second one
19:38:38 <mkarray> I just finished the side task I've been working on, so I'll be back to working on this now :)
19:39:05 <fungi> those both sound great
19:39:05 <mkarray> Didn't know it was added as a proposal though!
19:39:54 <mkarray> I actually wrote out everything I plan on changing but we can talk about that when we reach it in the agenda
19:42:38 <SotK> #topic NDSU Capstone Students
19:43:12 <diablo_rojo> The plan is for them to add to the migration script
19:43:22 <diablo_rojo> so that we can optionally migrate bps as well
19:43:29 <SotK> sounds good
19:44:01 <fungi> had a brief conference call with them last week (thursday)
19:44:25 <diablo_rojo> I'm guessing if they are working on testing, they are close to something
19:44:48 <fungi> outlined what the script does currently and what little hopefully needs to be done to add the blueprint queries for the lp api
19:45:32 <fungi> i expect nothing new really needs to be written for the sb side of the script since it's just creating more stories like the bug import process does
19:46:37 <SotK> yeah I imagine there shouldn't be too many changes needed to the storyboard-side of the script, but then I'm not super familiar with launchpadlib
19:47:32 <fungi> that's my bigger concern. i've heard stories about how much of a bolt-on the blueprint feature was in launchpad
19:47:50 <fungi> so entirely possible the api methods for it are... lacking
19:48:34 <persia> There are a few, as at one point blueprints was used with automation for some stuff, but yeah, blueprints was not part of the big merge and initial API implementation, which makes it less than optimal.
19:51:03 <fungi> i guess those interns have their work cut out for them in that case ;)
19:51:27 <diablo_rojo> Hopefully it all goes alright
19:51:43 <diablo_rojo> Was kinda hoping they would show up if they had questions
19:54:19 * SotK hopes they pop up in #storyboard and say hi sometime
19:54:57 <SotK> #topic Forum Planning
19:55:08 <SotK> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/SB_train_forum_brainstorming Etherpad
19:55:19 <diablo_rojo> If the propsal in the etherpad looks good I will submit it.
19:55:36 <diablo_rojo> If you want to add anything, feel free to do so before the end of the day?
19:55:42 <diablo_rojo> I can submit it tomorrow?
19:55:45 <SotK> sure
19:55:49 <SotK> I think it looks good to me
19:56:55 <SotK> #topic Potential Features (mkarray)
19:57:50 <mkarray> small reminder for those who aren't working on search:
19:59:21 <mkarray> There is a search, which looks for stories that match a certain query. There is a browse, that is only accessible through the api, and there is a sort of "Pseudo-Browse" which a user can click on, it acts like a browse but is limited to certain characteristics based on what storyboard feature it is.
20:00:43 <mkarray> I intend to keep searching the same, bring browsing to the web-interface through a query syntax, and take out the limitation for what can be "Pseudo-browsed"
20:01:54 <fungi> this sounds like it might also provide an answer to cdent's questions from a few days ago about how to find out what object types the search term filtering supports
20:02:23 <SotK> that sounds good to me, though I'd be tempted to also make the fulltext-based searching available via the query syntax
20:04:04 <SotK> we're about out of time so can continue in #storyboard if folk want to discuss further
20:04:10 <SotK> #endmeeting