19:02:31 #startmeeting swift 19:02:32 Meeting started Wed Mar 20 19:02:31 2013 UTC. The chair is notmyname. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 19:02:33 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 19:02:35 The meeting name has been set to 'swift' 19:03:13 today we need to talk about the QA status and any backports 19:03:41 creiht: ping 19:03:46 anyone from RAX here? 19:03:50 for a QA status 19:04:47 also, we've had a few merges into master (and some patches proposed) since the rc1 was tagged. I'm guessing some of those need to be in the release and some don't 19:04:49 howdy 19:05:20 creiht: know anything about the status of QA on swift? 19:05:43 creiht: dunno.. I'm WFH today 19:05:48 heh, ok 19:06:41 and there may or may not be a cloudfiles meeting going on now 19:06:42 looks like we have a keystoneauth patch that should be merged and a bulk delete patch that should probably get backported 19:07:02 creiht: ah, ok. if that's a regularly scheduled thing, then we may need to adjust our meeting time 19:07:18 talking about QA & rc: is this the right time to submit a patch to improve (my account quota) documentation? 19:07:55 cschwede: it's always the right time to submit improvements to docs ;-) 19:08:36 are there other patches that should be backported? 19:08:52 notmyname: then I'll submit the patch tomorrow :) 19:10:25 fun times in a swift meeting when most of the core devs aren't here :-/ 19:10:48 reminder to submit summit talks at summit.openstack.org 19:10:54 we've got some good talks proposed 19:11:03 notmyname: I think there are a couple of bugfixes that will need to get in from our side 19:11:17 ya what he said 19:11:28 dfg: beyond the bulk? 19:11:40 hi, sorry for being late 19:12:05 notmyname: could we assist getting replication network in? 19:12:10 davidha: no worries 19:12:53 ogelbukh: checking 19:12:54 notmyname: do we want to backport anything related to the hash function? 19:13:28 ogelbukh: looks like that needs some additional review love, so it's blocked on that now. I'd love to see it merged and backported, but that has QA consequences 19:13:56 It would seem a bit late to get it in without rushing it 19:14:09 davidha: I've only been following the discussion on the LP bug, but I see there is a -2 in gerrit 19:14:11 and it feels like we have already rushed quite a bit in the release 19:14:13 creiht: agreed 19:14:50 creiht: was this reg the hash item? 19:15:09 davidha: I was referring to replication network 19:16:03 notmyname: ok, I am not sure gholt objects to this still - but we need hholt for that :) 19:16:21 the hash thing is kinda meh 19:16:24 to me 19:16:30 notmyname: right now slo- but we're still testing so there could be more 19:16:50 dfg: ok, thanks 19:18:36 as new things come in that need to be backported, please propose them to milestone-proposed 19:18:52 ogelbukh: ok, will wait for reviews then 19:18:56 oops 19:19:03 notmyname I meant ) 19:19:30 davidha: I think the hash issue discussion can stay in LP/gerrit for now. especially since all of the interested parties aren't here anyway 19:20:20 anything else that needs to be discussed specifically regarding swift for the grizzly release? 19:20:53 if the syslog/infinite loop bug can get fixed, we should definitely backport that one 19:20:55 notmyname: sure - we are also still discussing it internally, have some more ideas for improvements, will take one or two more days to go through evenrything 19:20:57 QA is being done by RAX. others should do it too, if they can. patches that need to be backported should be proposed to milestone-proposed (after being proposed to master) 19:21:01 @notmyname, not particularly for grizzly, but this patch sit there for two months now, and I have rebased quite few times, 19:21:04 davidha: ok, cool 19:21:06 can any one please review it. 19:21:08 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/15818/ 19:21:22 o/ 19:21:32 tongli: ya, :-( 19:21:45 i'll try to update https://review.openstack.org/#/c/24415/ and propose it for milestone by tomo 19:22:37 chmouel: cool. I just now saw your follow-up comments 19:23:16 as we get closer to april 4, please also review the python-swiftclient patches. there are a few that implement the new functionality that will be in the release 19:23:45 @notmyname, yeah, and this one. 19:23:46 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/22569/ 19:23:50 yep will get some time for review tomo morning 19:24:32 tongli: yup, that's something that should be fixed before the next python-swiftclient release 19:25:32 last call for anything else pertaining to the release? 19:26:31 I'll get a chance to start reviewing the summit talk proposals soon. if you've submitted one, you'll hear something soon 19:27:08 dfg: do you have a team meeting at this time? 19:28:17 if so, I'll propose a few alternate time slots and send an email out 19:28:31 notmyname: I was wrong 19:28:40 ah ok 19:28:42 huh? 19:28:50 my calendar is messed up 19:29:06 i'm just doing other stuff. did you need something? 19:29:15 who will be at the summit? 19:29:27 just know today, that I am approved to go to the summit. 19:29:32 dfg: creiht said the cloudfiles team meeting was now, and then he said his calendar was messed up 19:30:42 tongli: great. see you there 19:30:43 notmyname: i don't know, i just work here- they're always changing the time but I'll tell him not to put it in this time slot 19:30:54 dfg: ok, thanks :-) 19:31:25 I think that covers it for stuff that needed to get mentioned at this meeting. let's call it done. 19:31:55 thanks for your time today 19:31:57 thanks 19:32:03 #endmeeting