19:01:01 <notmyname> #startmeeting swift
19:01:02 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Jan 28 19:01:01 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is notmyname. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
19:01:03 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
19:01:06 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'swift'
19:01:08 <notmyname> who's here for the swift meeting?
19:01:11 <cschwede> o/
19:01:11 <peluse> yo
19:01:13 <mattoliverau> o/
19:01:13 <zaitcev> o/
19:01:15 <gvernik> hello
19:01:40 <notmyname> clayg: torgomatic: ping
19:01:43 <acoles> hi
19:01:49 <torgomatic> wat
19:01:51 <notmyname> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Swift
19:01:54 <cutforth> hello
19:02:14 <notmyname> not a ton to cover today
19:02:24 <notmyname> oh. hackathon isn't on there. that too
19:02:31 <notmyname> first up: swift 2.2.2 release
19:02:37 <notmyname> #topic swift 2.2.2 release
19:03:01 <notmyname> I'd like to see patches land today and tag an rc. then final release next week (on 2/2)
19:03:30 <notmyname> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/145970/ is the last substantive patch
19:03:39 <notmyname> zaitcev just added some comments
19:03:54 <clayg> oh this is today?
19:03:56 <notmyname> zaitcev: looks like minor stuff, right?
19:04:00 <zaitcev> yes
19:04:28 <zaitcev> Like, one place adds '%' to end of output and the other does not.
19:04:33 <notmyname> the most important question is if this is the last one related to data placement that needs to land in this release
19:05:09 <clayg> well - i mean... that's just like your *opinion* man
19:05:13 <notmyname> or are there other outstanding patches that need to land too
19:05:31 <clayg> notmyname: did you already merge the one about... missing zero tier something
19:05:38 <notmyname> clayg: yup
19:05:45 <clayg> then i'm good
19:05:58 <notmyname> great
19:06:26 <notmyname> I just proposed https://review.openstack.org/#/c/150909/ with the changelog updates
19:06:31 <clayg> zaitcev is the main with making output/format on command line utilities better - if he has opinions on set_overload I'm happy to hand that off and take on the reviewer role
19:07:03 <notmyname> the data placement stuff is tricky, so please take a loot and make sure I said things clearly and correctly. I'd appreciate any help on it
19:08:06 <acoles> notmyname: reads well to me
19:08:08 <cschwede> notmyname: changelog looks good to me, but then i’m biased because there are no real news for me ;)
19:08:36 <mattoliverau> me too
19:08:40 <notmyname> thanks
19:09:10 <notmyname> cschwede: heh. some of that data placement stuff is from you too. the first one about dancing partitions was something you saw, right?
19:09:35 <peluse> ditto
19:10:16 <notmyname> zaitcev: on clayg's patch, are you ok with everything if the percent signs get consistent?
19:10:17 <cschwede> notmyname: hmm, or clayg or torgomatic - i think one of us saw this. not sure who was the first
19:10:28 <zaitcev> notmyname: yes, +2
19:10:36 <notmyname> cschwede: I thought we both had customers with it (well, we did)
19:10:56 <cschwede> notmyname: yes, and we still have ;)
19:11:20 <notmyname> cschwede: so go +2 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/145970/ and we can get a release for you! ;-)
19:11:28 <notmyname> (after fixing % signs, of course)
19:12:03 <notmyname> clayg: will you have a change to push another patch set right after this, or would you like someone else to?
19:12:34 <clayg> notmyname: i'm not entirely sure how zaitcev would like it to look and I *am* in the middle of something
19:12:53 <notmyname> zaitcev: can you push a new patchset there?
19:12:57 <clayg> zaitcev: I'd just love you forever if you wanna go ahead and fix it for me
19:13:00 <zaitcev> sure
19:13:04 <notmyname> thanks
19:13:05 <clayg> woo hoo!  thanks!
19:13:18 <notmyname> anything else on this release? questions or concerns?
19:13:40 <tdasilva> change log looks good
19:13:49 <notmyname> tdasilva: thanks
19:13:50 <mattoliverau> not that i can think of.. but I'm not really that awake :P
19:14:00 <clayg> zaitcev: can you keep a 0.6f output *somewhere* though?
19:14:35 <zaitcev> clayg: I'll just keep it where you left it in parenthesis
19:14:47 <tdasilva> notmyname: just a quick question on change log. do we ever add a note like: "for more info, read this: _link_" ?
19:14:57 <clayg> i think that's it maybe for the the ring release (took us long enough) - but there's still tones of outstanding reviews that we need to keep on
19:15:01 <notmyname> tdasilva: yes. I've done that before
19:15:07 <clayg> ^ i.e. no rest for anyone
19:15:10 <notmyname> clayg: yes absolutely
19:16:01 <notmyname> tdasilva: ya maybe a link to http://docs.openstack.org/developer/swift/overview_ring.html#overload is good
19:16:22 <tdasilva> notmyname: yeah, that's what i was thinking
19:16:28 <notmyname> thanks. I'll add that
19:16:49 <notmyname> moving on
19:16:53 <notmyname> #topic hackathon
19:17:01 <notmyname> #link https://www.eventbrite.com/e/openstack-swift-hack-a-thon-sponsored-by-swiftstack-tickets-15226147818
19:17:24 <notmyname> it's just 2 weeks (1.5 weeks) away
19:17:31 <notmyname> I'm looking forward to seeing you here
19:17:41 <notmyname> if there are other people that need to come, please let me know.
19:17:52 * peluse start shining his shoes
19:18:10 <notmyname> I'm currently going through the registration list, and there is still some space if someone else needs to come
19:19:06 <notmyname> beyond the normal "here's some patches we should look at", I expect us to spend a lot of time on EC, some on encryption, and maybe a couple of other big things (sharded containers, fast-POST, ??)
19:19:31 <notmyname> please let me know asap if you have any concerns
19:19:41 <acoles> notmyname: service tokens?? ;)
19:19:49 <notmyname> acoles: ah! that's the other one!
19:19:51 <notmyname> yes that
19:20:48 <zaitcev> I expect EC to dominate. It was difficult for me to grasp.
19:20:50 <mattoliverau> maybe I'll get up to speed on EC on the flight over, it'll be long enough :P
19:21:10 <notmyname> #topic priority reviews
19:21:11 <peluse> mattoliverau, don't count on it being long enough :)
19:21:17 <notmyname> heh
19:21:18 <mattoliverau> lol
19:21:36 <notmyname> so I'm working on https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Swift/PriorityReviews and there are a few good things listed there
19:21:47 <notmyname> but...
19:22:06 <notmyname> I need to update it. I expect to later this week.
19:22:18 <notmyname> that being said, what patches are on your mind that we need to look at?
19:23:00 <zaitcev> I had a couple that _I_ needed to examine
19:23:35 <zaitcev> oh, some are merged already (135102)
19:24:02 <tdasilva> it would be great if people could start looking at object versioning, but not sure how "priority" it is...
19:24:29 <notmyname> tdasilva: link?
19:24:39 <notmyname> tdasilva: you're coming to the hackathon, right?
19:25:02 <tdasilva> notmyname: yes
19:25:13 <notmyname> tdasilva: I think it would be great to look at it before and discuss it there :-)
19:25:23 <tdasilva> #link: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/134347/
19:25:36 <notmyname> thanks
19:26:33 <notmyname> tdasilva: why'd you move the doc? ...maybe we can address that later...
19:27:24 <tdasilva> notmyname: ok
19:28:15 <notmyname> there's quite a few patches outstanding. whew. I'll go through them asap and get them sorted
19:28:42 <notmyname> tdasilva: do you have any specific questions to bring up in here about versioning?
19:29:31 <tdasilva> notmyname: no, don't think so. clayg helped out a lot, so I think it is ready now
19:29:37 <notmyname> great!
19:29:46 <notmyname> any other patches to bring up in here with the group?
19:30:26 <tdasilva> just fyi for anyone interested, I was posted the first "sinlge process" patch, and I expect Ignacio and I will be working on that during hackathon
19:30:46 <tdasilva> it would be great to get other people looking at it..
19:30:50 <peluse> tdasilva, yes, I saw that!  I am very intersted in that and will try to look before the SanFran party
19:30:56 <tdasilva> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/149329/
19:31:49 <tdasilva> peluse: cool, thanks!
19:32:32 <notmyname> tdasilva: ok, I'll make a note of that too
19:32:39 <notmyname> #topic open discussion
19:32:43 <notmyname> anything else from anyone?
19:33:08 <zaitcev> nothing important comes to mind
19:33:16 <notmyname> lunch comes to mind
19:33:19 <peluse> FYI I'll have another ver of the EC reconstructor up soon and will the get the spec up to date with the current implementation
19:33:25 <notmyname> peluse: thanks
19:33:40 <peluse> so that mattoliverau has something good to read on the way over :)
19:33:53 <mattoliverau> peluse: thanks ;)
19:33:56 <notmyname> peluse: a sleep aid?
19:34:37 <peluse> what??? its like crack cocaine baby
19:34:43 <notmyname> lol
19:35:03 <notmyname> ok. let's call it
19:35:09 <notmyname> thanks for coming
19:35:12 <notmyname> #endmeeting