19:00:37 <notmyname> #startmeeting swift
19:00:38 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Feb  4 19:00:37 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is notmyname. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
19:00:39 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
19:00:42 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'swift'
19:00:49 <notmyname> who's here for the swift meeting?
19:00:52 <mattoliverau> o/
19:00:53 <cschwede> o/
19:00:54 <zaitcev> o/
19:00:55 <cutforth> o/
19:00:57 <kota_> o/
19:00:57 <torgomatic> 🆗
19:01:09 <acoles> o/
19:01:16 <notmyname> hello, everyone
19:01:24 <peluse_> yo
19:01:30 <mattoliverau> hey notmyname :)
19:01:43 <notmyname> #topic swift 2.2.2 release
19:02:29 <notmyname> this happened. thanks for working on it
19:03:02 <notmyname> that's about all I had there. unless there are any questions or concerns
19:03:33 <notmyname> #topic hackathon next week
19:03:35 <zaitcev> Nothing important
19:03:45 <mattoliverau> woo
19:03:47 <notmyname> I think most of you are coming to san francisco next week for the hackathon
19:03:58 <notmyname> I'm looking forward to seeing you here
19:04:16 <zaitcev> Same here.
19:04:35 <notmyname> like normal, we'll come up with some topic and agenda items first thing on monday morning
19:04:49 <notmyname> for logistics, there's an evening event on tuesday night
19:04:59 <peluse_> yes!
19:05:00 <notmyname> bay cruise and dinner
19:05:07 <peluse_> yes yes yes!
19:05:12 <mattoliverau> cool
19:05:20 <cschwede> great :)
19:05:34 <tdasilva> Nice!
19:05:37 <acoles> sounds good
19:05:39 <zaitcev> I dunno, it's probably cold as heck at bay. I'm afraid to catch a cold.
19:05:41 <notmyname> as to other logistics, are there any concerns or things I can help with? hotels, transportation, weather, etc?
19:05:46 <notmyname> zaitcev: bring a coat
19:05:58 <kota_> nice
19:06:04 <peluse_> and plenty of "anti-freeze" :)
19:06:08 <mattoliverau> oh yeah.. its like winter
19:06:12 <torgomatic> notmyname: yes, please fix the weather :)
19:06:23 <notmyname> torgomatic: what do you mean? I love SF weather :-)
19:07:22 <notmyname> we should have plenty of power and network and space. should be a good few days
19:07:35 <notmyname> any questions about it?
19:07:43 <tdasilva> Can I park in the front?
19:07:47 <peluse_> ha!
19:07:50 <cschwede> we start at 9am monday morning, right?
19:07:50 <notmyname> ah. parking is a good question
19:07:52 <notmyname> torgomatic: no
19:07:54 <notmyname> cschwede: yes
19:08:02 <notmyname> tdasilva: no
19:08:07 <tdasilva> Lol
19:08:11 <notmyname> don't get a rental car.
19:08:18 <peluse_> FYI I think I get in at about 10 Mon morn... will get there as quickly as I can though
19:08:51 <tdasilva> notmyname: sorry, ir was a joke
19:08:58 <notmyname> tdasilva: good point though
19:09:06 <notmyname> we'll have some muni passes if you want to get around the city. parking is terrible and there's plenty of transportation available. so unless you're going a long way outside of SF, don't get a car
19:09:35 <acoles> peluse_: don't you get dropped by corporate helicopter or something?
19:09:54 <mahatic_> notmyname, nice stuff. If you told me there was going to cruise and dinner, I would have booked my tickets! ;)
19:09:54 <peluse_> parachute this time I think :)
19:09:58 <zaitcev> I'm going to commute from by BART
19:10:12 <zaitcev> The recommended Pickwick asked $1500
19:10:34 <peluse_> Pickwick??
19:10:50 <torgomatic> the Pickwick is a hotel near the hackathon
19:11:03 <notmyname> hotel nearby. I was told we had a corporate rate there. but I don't know the details
19:11:03 <zaitcev> It's not even near really. Pickwick is near the old office.
19:11:14 <peluse> ahhh
19:11:15 <notmyname> it's still walking distance :-)
19:11:39 <mattoliverau> its 10 minute walk apparrently
19:11:56 <mattoliverau> thats where i'll be
19:11:56 <notmyname> if you have any problems or questions on your transport in, my cell is 254-722-3321. give me a call if you need me
19:12:29 <notmyname> #topic current things we're working on
19:12:40 <notmyname> peluse: can you give us a quick EC status update?
19:12:53 <peluse> sure, main work since last meeting is around reconstructor
19:13:03 <peluse> 2 patches, once code and one design spec, links coming... onse sec
19:13:24 <peluse> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/131872/
19:13:38 <peluse> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/142146/
19:13:52 <peluse> and tsg will ahve an update this week on the last part of the PUT sequence (the .durable file)
19:13:58 <peluse> trello and priority reviews are up to date
19:14:08 <peluse> the mroe folks that can read the design spec before next week the better
19:14:13 <notmyname> thanks
19:14:21 <peluse> its all pretty well up to date (maybe a few minor details off) but main design is up to date
19:14:22 <notmyname> yes, I expect EC to take up a lot of time next week
19:14:55 <peluse> that'a all I got for now :)
19:15:04 <notmyname> after the resconstructor and PUT path, the GET is is the only major outstanding piece, right?
19:15:14 <peluse> for basic functionlity yes
19:15:28 <peluse> we still have a lot fo work to do on tests and performance validation
19:15:43 <notmyname> right. tests are mandatory
19:15:48 <peluse> well, maybe characterization is a better qualifier for performance
19:15:54 <notmyname> ok
19:16:02 <notmyname> but the basic functionality is the goal
19:16:15 <notmyname> and the goal is for the openstack kilo release
19:16:16 <peluse> and a few misc code parts also, still some great opportunties for folks to jump in near the end here and contribute!
19:16:41 * peluse is always hopeful but not holding breath on this one (for Kilo)
19:16:46 <notmyname> :-)
19:17:00 <notmyname> acoles: you've been working on some service token stuff
19:17:09 <briancline> i've been living under a rock - when's kilo supposed to be out?
19:17:28 <notmyname> briancline: two months (ish)
19:17:36 <notmyname> briancline: early april
19:17:36 <acoles> notmyname: yes, well, reviewing donagh's patch, which is in good shape.
19:17:44 <briancline> thanks
19:18:11 <acoles> ready for other reviews imho: https://review.openstack.org/137086
19:18:22 <notmyname> #link https://review.openstack.org/137086
19:18:30 <notmyname> ok
19:18:36 <acoles> i know mattoliverau and ho have already reviewed which is great
19:18:47 <mattoliverau> acoles: :)
19:19:09 <notmyname> acoles and cschwede have some "change the ring part power stuff"
19:19:15 <acoles> btw, much of the (large) line change count is doc and tests
19:19:21 <notmyname> acoles: cschwede: that was fun to wake up to this morning :-)
19:20:03 <mattoliverau> I'm going to have to read me some  scroll back then
19:20:07 <acoles> yeah, i put up a spec today https://review.openstack.org/152935 , welcome feedback on that if folks get chance
19:20:27 <notmyname> thanks
19:20:28 <notmyname> and mattoliverau has been working on some container sharding ideas to better handle large containers
19:20:44 <peluse> ahh, cool
19:20:47 <mattoliverau> Yup, theres a brain dump spec
19:20:56 <notmyname> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/139921/
19:20:57 <mattoliverau> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/139921/
19:21:03 <mattoliverau> nice
19:21:27 <mattoliverau> Working on 2 POC's to pad out issues, they in my github account
19:21:33 <notmyname> cool
19:21:43 <notmyname> I'm looking forward to talking about it next week :-)
19:21:45 <mattoliverau> path hashing and distributed prefix trees
19:21:53 <mattoliverau> me too!
19:22:09 <notmyname> there's one patch and one bug I wanted to bring up in here
19:22:15 <notmyname> (quickly, I've got to run in 8 minutes)
19:22:21 <notmyname> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/137659/
19:22:48 <notmyname> this is an issue that hubic/ovw (hosting provider in EU) is running in to and wants to see land ASAP
19:23:13 <notmyname> looks like one outstanding issue raised by tdasilva
19:23:17 <peluse> OK, I can sign up to look at it this afternoon
19:23:20 <notmyname> peluse: thanks
19:23:44 <notmyname> the issue from tdasilva is a config issue so looking at the code shouldn't be blocked by that
19:24:01 <notmyname> the other is a bug
19:24:02 <torgomatic> my test system doesn't have a new-enough kernel to even try that out :|
19:24:03 <notmyname> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-swiftclient/+bug/1379252
19:24:08 <notmyname> in python-swiftclient
19:24:29 <notmyname> I've come across two people just this week who want to use --skip-identical with large objects (SLO)
19:24:49 <notmyname> adding in the bug submitter, that's 3 production users hitting this issue
19:25:26 <tdasilva> torgomatic: try on fedora ;)
19:25:27 <notmyname> right now it's just a bug and no code to review, but it would be good to at least think of some ideas on how to solve it and leave comments
19:25:33 <notmyname> tdasilva: lol
19:26:00 <notmyname> what other issues or current tasks do you want to bring up this week?
19:26:24 <mattoliverau> meeting next week?
19:26:29 <notmyname> thanks
19:26:31 <notmyname> no meeting next week
19:27:14 <notmyname> ok, if there's nothing else to bring up, let's call it
19:27:18 <notmyname> thanks for coming
19:27:21 <notmyname> #endmeeting