07:01:27 <acoles> #startmeeting swift 07:01:28 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Nov 1 07:01:27 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is acoles. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 07:01:29 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 07:01:31 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'swift' 07:01:42 <acoles> hello who is here for 0700 swift meeting? 07:01:46 <kota_> hello 07:01:49 <mahatic> me 07:01:51 <psachin> o/ 07:03:38 <acoles> hi everyone 07:03:53 <acoles> the agenda is here https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Swift 07:04:12 <acoles> or rather, the agenda is not there :) seems we don't have any items 07:04:33 <acoles> but let's catch up briefly 07:05:17 <acoles> clocks have changed in UK so this really is now an 0700 meeting for me, and my name was left over to be chair from the last meeting! 07:05:37 <mahatic> acoles: thanks for doing this meeting so early! 07:05:39 <acoles> #topic Sydney 07:05:54 <acoles> who's going to Sydney? I am not :( 07:06:03 <mahatic> me neither :( 07:06:15 <kota_> yey, I'm just preparing the trip, print my thickets or so. 07:06:18 <m_kazuhiro> I'm going to sydney. 07:07:32 <acoles> I hope it is a good productive week 07:08:00 <acoles> #topic priority reviews 07:08:20 <acoles> looking at the priority review list: 07:08:23 <acoles> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Swift/PriorityReviews 07:08:35 <acoles> there has been some progress :) 07:09:02 <kota_> sounds nice 07:09:12 <acoles> thanks to reviewers 07:09:36 <acoles> I know that notmyname is hoping to cut a release this week 07:10:15 <acoles> first on the list has one +2 already https://review.openstack.org/#/c/509306/ 07:11:06 <acoles> and the second too! 07:11:25 <acoles> so maybe we can get some more of those merged ready for the release 07:12:38 <acoles> #topic open discussion 07:12:46 <acoles> anyone want to raise any topics? 07:12:57 <acoles> m_kazuhiro: what is symlink patch status? 07:13:25 <kota_> acoles: that's what I was trying to say :D 07:13:54 <m_kazuhiro> acoles: Ready for review. But kota add -1 for encoding test of symlink headers. So you can review other codes. 07:14:17 <acoles> ok 07:14:35 <kota_> briefly describing, I've been thinking for the symlink target format 07:14:38 <acoles> will there be another version soon to address kota's -1? 07:15:28 <kota_> m_kazuhiro: please go a head for the answer. 07:15:41 <m_kazuhiro> acoles: Umm, I want some days for think how to address. 07:16:16 <kota_> acoles: can i describe about it a bit, here? 07:16:25 <acoles> kota_: sure 07:16:33 <kota_> ok 07:16:55 <kota_> so... 07:17:27 <mattoliverau> o/ 07:17:39 <mattoliverau> sorry I'm late, had to feed and bath the toddler 07:17:41 <kota_> the point is what format, in particular url encoded or not should be in x-symlink-target header. 07:18:01 <acoles> mattoliverau: NP, we're just hearing about symlink patch status 07:18:32 <kota_> the description said clearly the path should be urlencoded for multi-bytes (or escape needed char). 07:18:52 <kota_> and i think that's correct and current patch set doesn't address the problem. 07:19:08 <kota_> that's what it happens on the current patch set. 07:19:13 <mattoliverau> on the last topic, I'm currently looking at the tmp dir xfs / meta-checksum xattr. But on a tmp xfs tangent atm. 07:19:37 <acoles> mattoliverau: great! thanks for you other reviews too 07:20:01 <kota_> I think, always, request and response uses urlencoded value at leaste *in the header*. 07:20:17 <kota_> even if it works if it's not urlencoded. 07:20:30 <acoles> kota_: is there disagreement about what should happen? or just implementation eeded? 07:21:39 <kota_> I don't think we have disagreement for now, just fixing the issue and tests. 07:21:42 <acoles> needed* 07:21:53 <acoles> kota_: ok 07:21:55 <kota_> acoles: is it reasonable? 07:22:05 <acoles> sounds reasonable to me 07:22:21 <kota_> acoles: kk, thanks! 07:22:25 <acoles> m_kazuhiro: did all the issues on https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/swift_symlink_remaining_discussion_points_fork get resolved? 07:22:57 <m_kazuhiro> acoles: Yes. All issues are resolved in current patch. 07:23:18 <acoles> good! 07:23:33 <acoles> sounds like good progress is being made on symlinks, nice work everyone 07:23:47 <kota_> yey 07:23:53 <acoles> any other topics? 07:24:27 <kota_> and I'm wondering if other core reviewers circle back to the patch for reviews again ;) 07:24:28 <mattoliverau> nothing really, 07:24:44 <kota_> i think it's getting good shape 07:25:10 <acoles> kota_: we must try 07:25:19 <mattoliverau> I wanted to say to kota_ and m_kazuhiro, I look forward to see you again this time here in Oz. And when are you both arriving? 07:25:20 <kota_> acoles: much appreciated! 07:25:44 <kota_> mattoliverau: Sunday morning. 07:26:05 <mattoliverau> kota_: I'm keep to look and play with symlinks. But wont have time until after summit prob 07:26:07 <m_kazuhiro> me too. 07:26:08 <kota_> m_kazuhiro will use same flight with me. 07:26:15 <mattoliverau> ahh cool :) 07:26:36 <mattoliverau> s/keep/keen/ 07:26:57 <acoles> one last topic from me 07:27:06 <acoles> #topic bug triage day 07:27:13 <acoles> today is bug day! 07:27:18 <kota_> ooooh, it's today! 07:27:25 <mattoliverau> oh, oops 07:27:46 <acoles> it's ok, if you forgot then you can do tomorrow and still overlap with many of us :P 07:28:05 <acoles> the triage list is here https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/swift-bug-triage-list 07:28:17 <acoles> I'm not sure when that was last updated 07:28:42 <acoles> but...I'm sure it won't be hard to find bugs that need to be classified 07:28:47 <acoles> or even fix a bug! 07:29:30 <mahatic> is the bug day every alternate week? (/me wonders if I missed that announcement) 07:29:39 <acoles> mahatic: no 07:30:03 <acoles> mahatic: IIRC we said we'd do maybe once per month, but it is not rigid schedule 07:30:45 <acoles> mahatic: and perhaps it was only 'announced' during the 2100 swift meeting 07:30:54 <mahatic> yeah. I believe about today, it was mentioned in a prev meeting by notmyname. Sorry, I missed that 07:30:59 <mahatic> acoles: yeah 07:31:15 <mahatic> acoles: thanks, got it 07:31:22 <acoles> but...any day is a good day to triage a bug :D 07:31:30 <mahatic> :D agree 07:32:24 * acoles wonders if we should schedule then for Thursdays so we all get a reminder in the immediately preceding 0700 and 2100 meetings 07:33:00 <acoles> #topic anything else? 07:33:15 <mahatic> hmm, I'll have a conflict. My Thursdays this time is scheduled for a work 1:1 :( 07:33:32 <mahatic> oh you mean the bug day 07:33:39 <mahatic> yeah, that sounds good 07:33:41 <acoles> mahatic: yes 07:34:14 <acoles> anyone have anything else for this meeting? 07:34:48 <acoles> tick 07:34:54 <kota_> that's all from me 07:34:54 <acoles> tock 07:35:32 <acoles> ok let's finish there. 07:35:45 <acoles> thanks everyone for being here and for all the great work 07:36:07 <acoles> 2100 UTC meeting later today (or tomorrow for most of you) 07:36:13 <mattoliverau> Thanks acoles 07:36:18 <mahatic> thanks acoles 07:36:21 <acoles> what's the command to end??? 07:36:43 <acoles> #endmeeting