21:01:41 #startmeeting swift 21:01:41 Meeting started Wed Dec 14 21:01:41 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is timburke. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 21:01:41 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 21:01:41 The meeting name has been set to 'swift' 21:01:53 who's here for the swift team meeting? 21:02:00 o/ 21:02:04 o/ 21:02:15 o/ 21:02:55 as usual, the agenda's on the wiki 21:03:04 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Swift 21:03:39 and as usual, i only just updated it immediately before the meeting ;-) 21:03:43 first up 21:03:52 #topic parse_request bug 21:04:32 we've still go issues with func tests, and they're starting to turn up on stable branches :-/ 21:05:37 I'm in the middle of reviewing your inline patch. Never quite got the end yesterday arvo. But will finish it this morning 21:05:53 clayg seems generally on board with the idea of just re-writing all of parse_request to suit our needs -- but i'm curious about how everyone else feels about it, too 21:05:57 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/866801 21:06:05 thanks mattoliver! 21:06:42 there is alot of new code, so just comparing to the eventlet version and making sure it covers our needs.. which I know you've done.. but just double checking 21:07:53 i appreciate how it means we can address https://bugs.python.org/issue33973 much more directly, but it's still nowhere near enough to get us to a net-negative (or even break-even) line change 21:08:38 yeah, totally understand, and thats fine :) 21:10:17 speaking of testing... 21:10:24 #topic testing under py310 21:10:38 we do it now! 21:10:50 \o/ 21:11:20 excellent 21:11:50 not much else to report, there :-) there's still a follow-up to clean up some deprecation warnings, but it's fairly low-priority 21:11:53 👍 21:12:49 at some point, i'll look at switching func tests from py38 to py310, too 21:13:38 next up 21:13:47 #topic 2.31.0 release 21:14:15 now that we've got py310 testing (and once we address the func test failures) i'd like to get a release out! 21:14:55 there's been a bunch of stuff that's landed in the last few months, and it'll be good to put it out in the world 21:15:42 yeah sounds good, though I guess we should wait for the embargo bug too? 21:15:56 i don't have a firm timeline on when i want to get it out yet, but if you know of any other issues that should get in, let me know! 21:16:20 mattoliver, the first rule about embargoed bugs is.... ;-) 21:16:30 lol 21:16:37 didn't say what it is :P 21:16:46 but true, sorry 21:16:47 but yes, that is on my radar 21:16:59 cool cool 21:17:02 no worries 21:18:11 that's all i've got for this week 21:18:17 #topic open discussion 21:18:28 what else should we discuss? 21:19:01 are we meeting next week? I for one will def not be here the week after (28th) 21:19:10 oh! good call! 21:19:17 oh yeah, me either 21:19:32 i propose we cancel the next two weeks' meetings and reconvene in January 21:19:38 +1 21:19:40 +1 21:19:48 +A :) 21:19:53 lol 21:19:56 :D 21:20:07 that puts the next meeting Jan 4 21:20:23 for some local definition of 4 ;-) 21:21:07 lol, so long as it's in UTC :P 21:22:17 all right, i think i'll call it for this year, then 21:22:31 enjoy the holidays everyone! 21:22:32 seeing as it the last meeting for the year, I don't have too much to talk about. if anyone gets bored and wants to start reviewing tracing, great, it although it still needs tests 21:22:40 otherwise happy holidays! 21:22:53 thanks for coming, and thank you for working on swift! 21:22:57 #endmeeting