06:33:13 <yamamoto_> #startmeeting taas
06:33:14 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Mar 23 06:33:13 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is yamamoto_. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
06:33:16 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
06:33:19 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'taas'
06:33:27 <yamamoto_> #topic Agenda
06:33:29 <yamamoto_> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/taas
06:33:50 <yamamoto_> #topic Summit planning schedule finalization
06:34:25 <yamamoto_> who added this?  is this about taas session?
06:34:35 <reedip> yamamoto_ yes
06:34:51 <reedip> I thought that if all the members are present here, we can finalize it quickly
06:35:06 <reedip> than over the email
06:35:48 <yamamoto_> unfortunately it doesn't seem to be case though.  let's use email.
06:36:00 <yamamoto_> #topic Async Calls
06:36:00 <reedip> Yes, okay, lets skip it
06:36:09 <yamamoto_> #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-March/090088.html
06:36:12 <reedip> yamamoto_ Anil sent an email
06:36:18 <reedip> for the async calls
06:36:26 <reedip> and I thought we can discuss it here
06:36:32 <reedip> but, I am not sure now
06:36:45 <reedip> can we discuss it on the ML itself?
06:37:02 <yamamoto_> sure.
06:37:12 <reedip> okay, moving on then, I guess
06:37:14 <yamamoto_> i guess we all agree async stuff is good idea.
06:37:28 <reedip> yamamoto_ : as per the last meeting, yes definetly
06:37:33 <reedip> definitely*
06:37:54 <yamamoto_> #topic TaaS Dashboard discussion
06:37:58 <reedip> but I think we can also get some input from neutrinoes
06:38:08 <yamamoto_> #undo
06:38:10 <openstack> Removing item from minutes: <ircmeeting.items.Topic object at 0x9fb9d50>
06:38:35 <reedip> okay, next topic ?
06:38:56 <yamamoto_> #topic TaaS Dashboard discussion
06:39:07 <reedip> so kaz submitted a patch
06:39:12 <kaz> yes
06:39:29 <reedip> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/295735/
06:39:45 <reedip> kaz, I see that its 403161 Lines long
06:40:05 <reedip> you copied the entire horizon onto taas?
06:40:14 <kaz> yes
06:40:21 <reedip> any reason ?
06:40:37 <kaz> because we are based on kilo.
06:40:58 <yamamoto_> any idea what happened on "Conflicts With" ?
06:41:02 <reedip> is there any reason for using Kilo and not using Mitaka?
06:41:29 <reedip> yamamoto_ : Not a clue... that what triggered my thoughts on this patch
06:41:48 <soichi> The Network Topology view was dramatically changed from Liberty.
06:42:01 <reedip> soichi : okay
06:42:14 <reedip> soichi : so if we are to support TaaS in Newton
06:42:34 <reedip> soichi: would we request Horizon to be based on Kilo to see the TaaS dashboard?
06:42:49 <soichi> no
06:43:30 <reedip> soichi: but if our changes are made on Kilo, wont we have to rework on it again, if we get the inclusion into governance in Newton?
06:43:40 <soichi> I guess one of the idea is to show the network topoloy view in kilo on the TaaS panel
06:43:49 <reedip> soichi: I think its a great idea to showcase it in the Summit
06:44:13 <reedip> soichi: yes, +1 , but I think some users may ask why we are showing the older topology, isnt it?
06:45:25 <reedip> soichi: lets work with this implementation , but can we start also to look for integration into Horizon  in its M-release version ?
06:45:27 <soichi> yes, i think some users may have a question.
06:45:54 <yamamoto_> soichi: kaz: for some reasons you want to stick with kilo, or it just means not-rebased-yet?
06:45:56 <soichi> reedip: agree
06:46:02 <reedip> I mean we can , for now, use the dashboard as it is, and demonstrate it, and get some ideas
06:46:35 <kaz> not rebased yes.
06:46:36 <reedip> and then , moving forward, we can use the latest release, rebase most the changes which can be ported, and work out the other nitty gritties in N-Release
06:47:11 <soichi> reedip: okay
06:47:49 <reedip> soichi : great , thats all from my side for the dashboard. Any other points to discuss for the dashboard?
06:48:19 <yamamoto_> how long do you think it would take to "rebase" it to master?
06:48:55 <yamamoto_> (i have no idea how different horizon kilo vs master)
06:49:31 <kaz> I am not sure , but it takes a few months.
06:49:37 <reedip> yamamoto_ : huge , if I am correct
06:49:48 <reedip> kaz, rebase takes months ?
06:50:06 <reedip> I think a lot of manual work is required, right
06:50:08 <reedip> ?
06:50:29 <yamamoto_> will it likely be re-implementation rather than a rebase?
06:51:44 <kaz> we need to see a new source code.
06:54:34 <yamamoto_> ok, i understand it's a major work.
06:55:42 <yamamoto_> i guess it's better (at least easier to read) to submit a patch to horizon/kilo rather than having the entire horizon tree.
06:56:07 <kaz> i see
06:57:22 <yamamoto_> let's move on
06:57:30 <yamamoto_> #topic Spec Discussion completion
06:57:55 <yamamoto_> i updated the review yesterday
06:58:05 <reedip> yamamoto_ I didnt see the new spec
06:58:30 <yamamoto_> reflected many of comments and moved some more things to "future work" section to minimize the scope for the first step
06:58:39 <reedip> yamamoto_ I think you put up some queries for me as well, I will check it out on the weekend/tomorrow and update it with the same
06:59:09 <yamamoto_> reedip: thank you
07:00:20 <reedip> yamamoto_ I would have preferred having the discussion with Anil and Vinay as well, for the points left in the spec which I mailed on the ML. Can we discuss this point as well next week ( I know the list is getting longer for the next week's discussion)
07:01:38 <yamamoto_> #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-March/088645.html
07:02:35 <yamamoto_> let's discuss on ML and/or review.
07:03:06 <yamamoto_> #topic Open Discussion
07:03:18 <reedip> yamamoto_ : nothing much from my end
07:03:50 <soichi> i have no additional topic.
07:04:02 <kaz> me too
07:04:08 <yamamoto_> i wanted to ask anil and vnyyad to tweak LP permissions to allow me triage bugs
07:04:19 <reedip> lets skip this and end the meeting then :)
07:04:28 <reedip> yamamoto_ I think you can email them
07:04:32 <reedip> ??
07:05:00 <yamamoto_> i said it here as i think anil said he will read the log :-)
07:05:32 <yamamoto_> thank you for attending everyone
07:05:45 <yamamoto_> bye
07:05:47 <yamamoto_> #endmeeting