05:30:54 <soichi> #startmeeting taas
05:30:55 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Nov 30 05:30:54 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is soichi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
05:30:56 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
05:30:58 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'taas'
05:31:07 <soichi> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/taas
05:31:25 <soichi> #topic L2 Extension Migration for TaaS : Status = in progress  : Review =
05:31:37 <soichi> #link https://review.openstack.org/401258
05:34:34 <soichi> I'd like to skip this one because reedip is not available today
05:34:43 <reedip> wooah wait wait
05:34:52 <reedip> i am here
05:34:53 <soichi> reedip: h
05:34:54 <reedip> :)
05:35:01 <soichi> :)
05:35:10 <reedip> sorry, was fixing a bug in OSC
05:35:25 <reedip> yeah, the ML2 is still under progress... needs a lot of rework
05:35:35 <soichi> i see
05:35:46 <soichi> #topic OSC Support for TaaS: Status = in progress: Review =
05:35:48 <reedip> I am trying to understand the ml2 plugin of FWaaS , SFC and QoS to implement it properly
05:36:11 <soichi> #link https://review.openstack.org/398767
05:36:23 <reedip> OSC has almost been implemented. yamamoto_ wanted the bulk delete operation to be in place
05:36:36 <reedip> so some test cases are still failing but I will put it up by today EOD
05:36:52 <reedip> I also need to write the doc for OSC for TaaS, I will do that by today as well
05:37:08 <reedip> WIP atleast for ^^
05:38:07 <yamamoto_> i have a question.  how long do we want to keep the old cli support?
05:39:09 <yamamoto_> reedip: do you know any policy about it?
05:39:57 <reedip> yamamoto_ Umm, neutronclient support can be removed as we do not have an official release of TaaS yet
05:40:11 <reedip> neutronclient will be deprecated
05:40:18 <reedip> but only at the CLI level
05:40:25 <reedip> not at the Library level
05:40:35 <yamamoto_> sure. but we probably want to create newton branch
05:40:43 <reedip> oh yeah
05:40:49 <yamamoto_> is the osc stuff compatible with newton?
05:41:05 <reedip> yamamoto_ : should be
05:41:31 <reedip> but as neutronclient's migration to OSC was not yet complete in newton, so I would like to avoid introducing OSC in newton
05:41:48 <soichi> +1
05:43:06 <yamamoto_> ok, good to know
05:44:11 <soichi> #topic Horizon Support for TaaS: Status = in progress: Review =
05:44:17 <soichi> https://review.openstack.org/396022
05:44:28 <kazu> yamamoto_: thank you for your comments, but i have a question.
05:44:47 <kazu> what does your comment: "these "patches" horizon.networktopology.js etc?" means?
05:46:05 <yamamoto_> actually i don't remember what i meant :-)
05:46:24 <reedip> hehehe :)
05:46:37 <yamamoto_> i guess "does this modify the data structure defined there?" or something like that?
05:47:04 <yamamoto_> just a dumb question from a js beginner. :-)
05:47:21 <kazu> i see. :)
05:47:55 <yamamoto_> how many of us are familiar with horizon and js?
05:48:37 <soichi> i'm a beginner :)
05:48:41 <yamamoto_> i guess it's better to ask someone more familiar with horizon review.  amotoki?
05:49:35 <soichi> kaz: what do you say to add Motoki san as a reviwer?
05:49:39 <reedip> amotoki san can be conferred for this. Let us add him as a reviewer to ask for his opinion. But he seems to be unwell
05:49:46 <kazu> ok, i would like to add him as a reviewer.
05:50:03 <reedip> so maybe we can add other horizon reviewers as well, or better send an email to Horizon team for their idea
05:50:33 <kazu> i see.
05:51:49 <soichi> #topic Migration to neutron-lib
05:51:59 <soichi> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/tap-as-a-service+branch:master+topic:bp/neutron-lib
05:57:27 <yamamoto_> is it anything to discuss about the topic?  or it's just a heads-up?
05:58:31 <soichi> i guess latter
05:58:51 <soichi> #topic do we want to create stable/newton branch?
05:59:02 <soichi> #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-November/107892.html
05:59:37 <yamamoto_> i think at this point it's a good idea to create the branch.
05:59:42 <vnyyad> +1
05:59:46 <yamamoto_> and maybe a release.
05:59:53 <soichi> +1
05:59:53 <kazu> +1
06:00:13 <yamamoto_> i volunteer to work on it, except LP bits which i don't have permission.
06:02:00 <vnyyad> LP is launchpad i ss
06:02:06 <vnyyad> assume
06:02:10 <yamamoto_> yes
06:02:28 <vnyyad> i did add anil into itt
06:02:45 <vnyyad> let me see if i can add you as well to it...
06:03:09 <yamamoto_> thank you
06:04:27 <soichi> #topic Open Discussion
06:05:29 <vnyyad> appologies for being absent for the last two meetings... the DST change means meeting starts at 6:30 here
06:05:50 <vnyyad> will discuss with anil and start action points on us
06:05:55 <vnyyad> soon
06:06:38 <soichi> okay, thank you
06:07:09 <yamamoto_> i always feel lucky that i live in a country w/o dst.
06:07:23 <vnyyad> :)
06:07:40 <kazu> +1
06:08:18 <soichi> Are you planning to attend PTG at Atlanta on Feb. 2017 ?
06:08:19 <soichi> If we will have a TaaS meetup and discussions with neutron team, I and Kaz will try to attend.
06:08:45 <yamamoto_> i plan to attend ptg
06:10:35 <soichi> okay, thank you
06:10:55 <soichi> do you have any topics?
06:11:50 <yamamoto_> #link http://www.openstack.org/ptg#tab_faq
06:12:10 <yamamoto_> i guess " Q: We are a small team. We don’t do mid-cycles currently. Now we’ll have to travel to four events per year instead of two?"
06:12:18 <yamamoto_> fits taas
06:13:14 <yamamoto_> i have a few too old patches
06:13:14 <soichi> i agree
06:13:16 <vnyyad> yes
06:13:17 <yamamoto_> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/256210/
06:13:25 <yamamoto_> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/301841/
06:15:16 <soichi> yamamoto_: i already put +2 for 256210 and i will put +2 (again) for 301841
06:15:24 <yamamoto_> thank you
06:16:10 <yamamoto_> no hurry.  just a reminder.
06:17:58 <yamamoto_> no more topic from me
06:19:39 <soichi> okay, i'd like to close today's meeting.
06:19:51 <soichi> #endmeeting