04:30:16 #startmeeting tacker 04:30:17 Meeting started Wed Aug 16 04:30:16 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is gongysh. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 04:30:18 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 04:30:21 The meeting name has been set to 'tacker' 04:30:33 #topic roll call 04:30:34 hi 04:30:42 o/ 04:30:46 who are you guys for tacker meeting? 04:30:55 trinaths, hi 04:31:07 O/ 04:31:10 gongysh: hi, 04:31:15 YanXing_an: hi 04:32:22 hi all 04:32:38 lets wait until 35 04:33:18 the Sydney summit presentation voting have result? 04:33:39 in particular for tung_doan and dharmendra 04:34:13 YanXing_an: august month end we might receive notifications whether in or out 04:34:41 Trinaths, ok, thanks 04:36:17 it seems these two guys will be absent 04:36:23 ok 04:36:40 #topic bp 04:36:54 YanXing_an, does your ns spec can be merged these days? 04:37:06 I want to release tacker server. 04:37:23 and need to know what I should wait for. 04:37:49 I thought I should wait for tung_doan and dharmendra patches. 04:38:02 hi all 04:38:08 tung_doan, hi 04:38:20 just talk about your patches. 04:38:34 I said I wanted to release tacker server. 04:38:45 and wait for your commitment to your patches. 04:38:57 how long I should wait for your patches? 04:38:58 gongysh: yep. Please let me know the deadline.. i will procedure this patch soon 04:39:04 I will try to finish it before tung_doan and dharmendra's patches, otherwise, not wait for me. 04:39:20 at most two weeks. 04:39:41 gongysh: my main effort will be put on this week 04:40:04 tung_doan, ok, thanks 04:40:10 the vnffg spec still have some issues to discuss and be confirmed 04:40:31 YanXing_an, trinaths , please review closely for tung_doan's patches. 04:40:55 gongysh: thanks 04:41:06 gongysh, ok, that patch is first priority 04:41:10 dharmendra's patches are important to us too, but he is not stable to do the contribution. 04:41:35 YanXing_an: trinaths: probably pls wait after i push the new patch this week 04:41:38 dkushwaha, hi 04:41:39 o/ 04:41:40 Hi, dhushwaha 04:41:45 sorry i amlate 04:41:54 ok 04:42:06 dkushwaha, in the end we got you. 04:42:13 :) 04:43:05 dharmendra's patches are important to us too, but he is not stable to do the contribution. 04:43:23 I want to release tacker server in 2 weeks. 04:43:49 gongysh: got it 04:43:50 dkushwaha, your patches about vnf monitor policies are important for this cycle. 04:44:18 do you have plan to finish it in these two weeks? 04:44:54 dkushwaha, hi 04:45:07 gongysh, i could not work much in last week, but yes, i am hoping to complete it in couple of days 04:46:11 dkushwaha, ok, let's do it with moonlight effort. 04:46:39 dkushwaha, I have commented your patch. 04:47:22 you can reply quickly, and if you need more review, you can ping me via wechat. 04:47:37 I can review once I got the notification. 04:47:51 lets merge it in this cycle. 04:48:17 if you have no time, let me know, I will arrange my company guy to help. 04:48:32 gongysh, sure, i will be able to check after 2 hours, and will respond/update 04:48:42 dkushwaha, ok, thanks. 04:48:52 YanXing_an, hi 04:49:12 hi 04:49:15 what do you want to discuss about ns with vnffg? 04:49:36 I have researched on ns last week, tested it 04:49:46 nice 04:49:51 i think we have two ways to support vnffg in ns 04:50:05 the first is importing vnffg in ns, similar with vnf in ns, 04:50:29 the second is defining vnffg details in ns, I don't know which one is best. 04:50:46 What do you think? 04:50:46 dkushwaha, do you have idea? 04:51:17 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/448109 04:51:40 Have updated a draft patchset 04:52:16 YanXing_an, i think it will be better to have vnffg in ns, instead to going through vnffg details 04:52:50 dkushwaha: +1 04:53:05 dkushwaha, you choose first or second one? 04:53:06 import vnffgd inside ns seems complicated 04:53:06 Ok, I also suggest to use the first way 04:53:18 i mean first one 04:53:59 why we dont follow the second one? 04:54:16 I think the second option is better 04:54:21 it seems ETSI standard also had the same desccription 04:54:22 Lets do step by step. 04:54:27 The problem is, when we create nsd, we should create vnfd, vnffgd at first. 04:54:40 even the second one will be easy to do 04:55:20 YanXing_an, now we support create with direct descriptors to create resources. 04:55:33 create -> creating 04:55:43 vnffg is the combinatin of VNFs.. it should be abstracted in ns. I think 04:57:12 If using the second one, we should define vnfd details in ns too. tung_doan, yes, you got the point 04:58:01 YanXing_an, first lets do via import vnffgd way, and also we need to do via embedded vnffgd in nsd 04:58:02 gongysh, in my openion first we should go with 1st approach as we already have stable vnffg. And then we can think to move 2nd one 04:58:22 dkushwaha, two minds think the same. 04:58:23 gongysh, +1 04:58:44 Ok, got it, thanks all 04:59:12 YanXing_an, do you have else about NS with vnffg? 04:59:24 Nothing 04:59:31 ok 04:59:38 #topic coding 05:00:01 tung_doan, what do you want to talk about your two bps' coding? 05:00:22 I cannot see new code patches in 05:00:32 gongysh: vnffg healing and scaling has some similar code 05:00:50 once i finish vnffg-healing, vnffg-scaling will be done soon 05:01:06 tung_doan, ok 05:01:11 now phuoc and I are trying to wrap two these features 05:01:32 look forwards to your code patches. 05:01:55 gongysh: sure. really want to finish both of them this week 05:02:05 #topic open discuss 05:02:31 dkushwaha: gongysh: could you help merge this: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/493308/ 05:02:31 YanXing_an, I think we have talked about state transition diagram before. 05:02:48 Yeh 05:02:50 some tacker users are not happy because of this bug :) 05:04:19 YanXing_an, do you have any progress on that? 05:04:26 If so, I must draw the diagram asap. 05:04:34 tung_doan, its again horizon 05:05:15 dkushwaha: right.. it is also up to ocata version 05:05:19 :) 05:05:31 YanXing_an, you help to do it, put it into related dev doc or user guide. 05:06:01 Gongysh, ok, will do it 05:06:31 tung_doan, I saw you have rechecked https://review.openstack.org/#/c/470863/ 05:06:33 it failed a test case. 05:06:39 do you have any idea for it? 05:07:40 gongysh: ah. i think if we recheck again it will work :) multi-vdu testing sometime gets failed :) 05:08:11 tung_doan, :) 05:08:25 ok 05:08:44 just like weather :) 05:09:31 children's face :) 05:09:50 haha 05:10:32 https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tacker-queen-grooming 05:11:01 lets thought it about new features in queen cycle. 05:11:13 thought -> think 05:11:54 any update on sydny topic selection ? 05:12:16 after the tacker server release, we will have one virtual meeting. 05:13:03 I will send out the ptg meeting announcement via openstack dev mail list today. 05:14:32 If we have the meeting link, please broadcast it at first time 05:18:06 ok 05:18:35 thats my all. 05:21:14 thanks 05:21:18 #endmeeting