04:30:19 <gongysh> #startmeeting tacker
04:30:20 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Jan 17 04:30:19 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is gongysh. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
04:30:21 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
04:30:23 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'tacker'
04:30:29 <gongysh> hi
04:30:35 <gongysh> #topic roll call
04:31:44 <gongysh> YanXingAn, hi
04:31:58 <YanXingAn> hi
04:33:08 <longkb> o/
04:37:38 <YanXing_an> hi, gongysh
04:37:47 <gongysh> YanXing_an, hi
04:38:04 <gongysh> it seems other guys are not available here.
04:38:10 <gongysh> we will have a short meeting
04:38:16 <dkushwaha> o/
04:38:23 <gongysh> longkb, please update the patch
04:38:30 <gongysh> I have see your demo
04:38:44 <gongysh> dkushwaha, YanXing_an , please see the longkb patch and demo
04:39:02 <YanXing_an> gongysh, ok
04:39:05 <gongysh> #info https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xzRaKVeikc&feature=youtu.be
04:39:10 <dkushwaha> gongysh, sure
04:39:18 <gongysh> dkushwaha, do you have something to discuss?
04:39:31 <dkushwaha> gongysh, couple of bugs
04:40:01 <gongysh> ok,  we can go through these bugs one by one
04:40:30 <dkushwaha> gongysh, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/532046/
04:41:01 <gongysh> dkushwaha, I think it is should be, the vnf cannot be deleted if it is part of any  ns
04:41:47 <longkb> gongysh, I will update it
04:42:20 <gongysh> longkb, do you have guys to use this feature?
04:42:47 <dkushwaha> gongysh, i think, we should delete only those VNFs which are in ACTIVE state, because, errored VNFs can be deleted(not sure). and another main point is if delete_ns called, it will set state as pending_delete and then proceed for VNF deletion. In that case it will get blocked
04:43:19 <dkushwaha> gongysh, thats why i check for ACTIVE only. what is your suggestion on that?
04:45:54 <gongysh> dkushwaha,  is there anyway to tell  if the deletion of vnf is triggered by deletion of ns?
04:46:25 <dkushwaha> gongysh, yup, by db.
04:46:56 <dkushwaha> gongysh, let me search & paste link here
04:47:09 <gongysh> dkushwaha, lets do this way.
04:49:50 <dkushwaha> gongysh, you mean keep it as it is?
04:50:23 <gongysh> dkushwaha, I mean to tell  if the deletion of vnf is triggered by deletion of ns by db.
04:50:41 <gongysh> you said by db,  we can do.
04:51:18 <dkushwaha> gongysh, ok, i will check it again and update it.
04:52:32 <dkushwaha> gongysh,  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/491658/
04:53:16 <dkushwaha> could you please check it again
04:53:32 <dkushwaha> i think its good to go
04:54:00 <gongysh> dkushwaha, could you add a unit test for it?
04:54:22 <dkushwaha> gongysh, ok, will do it
04:55:43 <gongysh> and how the command line to provide a '' description?
04:57:51 <dkushwaha> gongysh, yea it can be an empty string
04:58:24 <gongysh> dkushwaha, tacker ns-create --nsd-name admin-nsd1 --description '' nnnn, right?
04:58:34 <dkushwaha> gongysh, yes
04:58:38 <gongysh> ok
04:59:04 <gongysh> next bug, please
04:59:26 <dkushwaha> gongysh, https://bugs.launchpad.net/tacker/+bug/1658364
04:59:27 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1658364 in tacker "DBReferenceError when Deploy or delete vnffg" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Tim Rozet (trozet)
05:00:06 <dkushwaha> i was lookong for this, but i needs to rebase it
05:00:44 <gongysh> ok
05:01:06 <gongysh> dkushwaha, please add a reno doc for each bug fix too.
05:01:18 <dkushwaha> gongysh, sure
05:01:39 <dkushwaha> gongysh, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/532802/
05:02:28 <gongysh> http://logs.openstack.org/02/532802/1/check/tacker-functional-devstack/5b811f1/testr_results.html.gz
05:02:46 <gongysh> dkushwaha, the name you are using is not an legal one in heat.
05:03:13 <gongysh> dkushwaha. we also need to consider the compatibility of previous uuid way.
05:04:12 <dkushwaha> gongysh, you mean something like vnf_name + vnf_id?
05:04:26 <gongysh> dkushwaha, yes
05:04:40 <dkushwaha> gongysh, ok, will update it
05:04:57 <gongysh> dkushwaha, compatibility is a big issue
05:05:50 <dkushwaha> gongysh, i feel the above error is may be due to some test cases,which i missed to update, but ok, i will check it again
05:05:52 <gongysh> we have to first consider the previous name pattern, and then new name pattern when we do vnf deletion or other operations.
05:07:51 <dkushwaha> gongysh, I done from my side for now.
05:08:05 <gongysh> dkushwaha, ok, thanks
05:08:29 <gongysh> #topic annoucement
05:09:25 <gongysh> it seems china mobile has a use cases for tacker, so we will do some big refactor in next cycle.
05:10:03 <gongysh> #topic open discussion
05:10:48 <gongysh> it seems phuoc cannot be here, we will talk k8s vnf at tacker channel when I can meet him.
05:10:59 <gongysh> anything else?
05:11:30 <gongysh> ok
05:11:37 <gongysh> lets end meeting
05:11:38 <gongysh> thanks
05:11:44 <gongysh> #endmeeting