08:07:51 <yasufum> #startmeeting tacker
08:07:52 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Jun 23 08:07:51 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is yasufum. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
08:07:53 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
08:07:55 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'tacker'
08:08:08 <yasufum> please go a head
08:08:16 <takahashi-tsc> OK
08:08:22 <takahashi-tsc> https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tacker-meeting
08:09:09 <takahashi-tsc> I'd like to discuss TST010 discuss (L17-), especially, bold part.
08:09:21 <takahashi-tsc> s/L17/L27/
08:11:15 <takahashi-tsc> First(L36-), I'd like to request to make all 2xx test and 4xx test. I also ask TST's policy about coverage of response code. Is it OK?
08:11:41 <hyunsikyang> I can't access above link
08:12:22 <takahashi-tsc> Really? I can access it...
08:12:31 <yoshito-ito> I can access, too. so might be network problem?
08:12:35 <yasufum> no problem from my side too
08:12:58 <masazumi-ota> I can access, too.
08:13:27 <yasufum> takahashi-tsc: could you write down the point here if possible
08:13:46 <hyunsikyang> I can see now sorry
08:13:50 <takahashi-tsc> You means all points about TST discuss?
08:15:21 <yasufum> OK, return back to the topic
08:16:10 <yoshito-ito> basically I agree to request all 2xx and 4xx tests
08:16:12 <yasufum> I roughly agreed with your suggestion in the last meeting, and no objection.
08:16:27 <yasufum> LGTM
08:16:33 <takahashi-tsc> Sure, so move to next topic.
08:16:45 <takahashi-tsc> About HTTP response header
08:17:41 <takahashi-tsc> I agree that we need tests which check HTTP response header.
08:17:46 <takahashi-tsc> In SOL002/003, there are only description about "Location" and "Link" fileds. Our request is only testing them? Is there anything others?
08:19:46 <yoshito-ito> I'm not sure how our request will be when requesting response header tests
08:20:22 <yoshito-ito> will it be a request to add check points related to response header in TST010?
08:21:18 <takahashi-tsc> "Location" and "Link" fields should be reply from server side, so we should check. I think these filed can be checked by Robot Framework.
08:22:20 <takahashi-tsc> In my opinion, these test is included in "API test".
08:23:36 <yoshito-ito> I agree. Some testcase in TST010 have some check points like "Check HTTP Response Header Contains ETag"
08:24:23 <yoshito-ito> but not sure our requests can be a request to TST010 to pick up all response header related check points, or simply to implement RF
08:25:23 <yoshito-ito> all RF codes is implemented according to TST010 so we need the check description in TST010 to have the test in RF
08:25:42 <hyunsikyang> +1
08:27:50 <takahashi-tsc> OK, so I think this should be a question or suggestion, not a strong request. And before that, we should check TST010 spec document.
08:28:10 <yoshito-ito> +1
08:28:28 <hyunsikyang> +1
08:28:47 <masazumi-ota> +1
08:29:49 <takahashi-tsc> Anything else? if no, move to next topic
08:30:35 <yasufum> go a head please
08:31:41 <takahashi-tsc> OK, I'll request to clarify tagging/branch naming policy of api-tests repository.
08:32:27 <yoshito-ito> +1
08:32:51 <takahashi-tsc> This is just required for development to use ROBOT framework, our task. We need to identify the test code set. I would like TST team to define such policy.
08:33:53 <masazumi-ota> +1
08:35:15 <takahashi-tsc> OK, and last is about  IOP tests. yoshito-ito thank you for your suggenstion
08:36:38 <takahashi-tsc> I think this is not about TST010, so I'll not include this topic in TST010 meeting on 30th June. But we need discussion to define our testing policy.
08:38:49 <takahashi-tsc> Sorry but I do not read the details of TST007 and plugtests test code yet... Anyway I'd like to continue to discuss.
08:40:06 <yoshito-ito> IOP test codes in etsi repo seems still under development
08:41:19 <yoshito-ito> so I agree to put this IOP test topic as our testing policy discussion
08:41:44 <yoshito-ito> and not to include in the coming TST010 meeeting
08:42:18 <takahashi-tsc> Sure, thanks.
08:42:56 <takahashi-tsc> That's all from me. Any other comments about TST discussion?
08:43:01 <yasufum> I agree to include IOP in our target
08:43:32 <yasufum> takahashi-tsc: thanks
08:46:42 <yasufum> It seems done all today
08:46:59 <yasufum> This is for logging. I would like to review EventAlarm from takahashi-tsc, https://review.opendev.org/#/c/700167/
08:47:11 <takahashi-tsc> Thanks
08:48:41 <yasufum> I would like to close this meeting if nothing remained.
08:49:32 <yasufum> Thanks for joining, bye
08:49:46 <masazumi-ota> bye
08:50:04 <yasufum> #endmeeting