08:00:43 <takahashi-tsc> #startmeeting tacker
08:00:44 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Aug 25 08:00:43 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is takahashi-tsc. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
08:00:45 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
08:00:47 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'tacker'
08:01:51 <takahashi-tsc> I think we have 2 topics at least, TST from me and revise docs from yoshito-ito
08:01:59 <takahashi-tsc> Any other topics?
08:02:15 <yoshito-ito> I have a topic about revising docs.
08:02:51 <yoshito-ito> oh, takahashi-tsc has already mentioned it, thank you.
08:03:40 <takahashi-tsc> OK. Can we start from my topic?
08:04:29 <yoshito-ito> yes, please!
08:05:09 <takahashi-tsc> OK https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tacker-meeting
08:05:16 <takahashi-tsc> L30-
08:06:30 <takahashi-tsc> I've participated TST meeting, and STF join the meeting. STF seems a team who make test code.
08:07:18 <takahashi-tsc> Basically, STF team agree with our proposal. Especially response code and response header.
08:08:23 <takahashi-tsc> But discussion is still needed and the actual test improvement may be in W cycle period...
08:08:57 <takahashi-tsc> Today, I'd like to discuss L38. i.e. What Tacker team can do for TST.
08:09:40 <takahashi-tsc> In my opinion, Tacker should not do standardization work, but we can contribute our own test code to TST.
08:10:09 <takahashi-tsc> What do you think about it?
08:11:42 <yoshito-ito> I agree. The standardization is not our (Tacker's) scope, but it's good to make feedback to TST.
08:12:18 <yoshito-ito> I'm not sure how the contrubution of our test code will be.
08:14:35 <takahashi-tsc> I think I'll improve Robot code for Tacker team. And some of them can be shared with STF team.
08:15:53 <yoshito-ito> OK, we can make bug reports to TST repository, which may be a simple error of Robot code or a wrong definition from SOL documents.
08:17:33 <takahashi-tsc> Agree. I think we proceed with it for "Tacker testing improvement", and share with STF/TST.
08:17:34 <masazumi-ota> I agree too. It should be closed to feedback such as conditions to be met for the test code.Standardization should be left to the TST as a traditional role.
08:19:49 <takahashi-tsc> OK, thank you for your comment. I write these comment in etherpad. I'll plan to discuss it with TST team.
08:20:12 <masazumi-ota> Thanks
08:20:28 <takahashi-tsc> If you have some other comment, please write in etherpad.
08:20:51 <yoshito-ito> Did you discuss the "tag" strategy in ETSI repository? Now we can find "2.4.1" and "2.6.1" are provided, and also 2.7.1 and 3.3.1 seems in developement.
08:21:31 <takahashi-tsc> Yes. you are correct. "2.4.1" and "2.6.1" are provided and later version is under development.
08:22:20 <takahashi-tsc> I suggest that TST should decide "maintenance policy". And STF team agree with it.
08:23:09 <yoshito-ito> Great. That is a important step.
08:23:25 <takahashi-tsc> I think they do not decide how to maintenance branch which is already released...
08:24:50 <yoshito-ito> I think we need to discuss when to start to try their Robot code. Can we wait for the policy from TST or STF?
08:25:20 <takahashi-tsc> In my current development for using Robot, I'll just use version 2.6.1. But we should continue to discuss with the output of our development.
08:26:20 <takahashi-tsc> In V cycle, I'll complete first development as above, and improve each (Tacker and TST/STF) code in W cycle.
08:26:57 <yoshito-ito> Great, thank you. I agree to use v2.6.1 first.
08:28:04 <takahashi-tsc> OK, can we move to next topic from yoshito-ito?
08:28:14 <yoshito-ito> OK
08:29:03 <yoshito-ito> I'm trying to revise Tacker documents.
08:29:52 <yoshito-ito> I found we need to update the doc structure itself because now we have unclear index.
08:30:19 <yoshito-ito> My proposal is shown in https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tacker-meeting.
08:30:32 <yoshito-ito> I welcome your feedback.
08:31:46 <yoshito-ito> I've already created a new doc structure. Also, I mapped the existing docs to it and marked "TBD" for new required docs.
08:32:41 <masazumi-ota> I have already checked out the proposal. I have no objection to it.
08:33:06 <takahashi-tsc> Great thanks! As you wrote, we start to writing testing guide especially Robot (L429-432)
08:34:19 <takahashi-tsc> Main topic is Robot, but we try to organize UT, FT and Robot testing.
08:35:06 <yoshito-ito> Thanks! It helps me a lot.
08:36:02 <yoshito-ito> I will create docs for ETSI NFV-SOL based implementation in Use Case Guide.
08:36:44 <takahashi-tsc> Yes, we and Tacker users need it.
08:37:15 <yoshito-ito> After the discussion in etherpad, I will upload a patch to re-design the structure of docs. Also I will propose required docs as much as possible in V release.
08:38:36 <yoshito-ito> I'm not familiar with the legacy Tacker implementation, so I welcome your help.
08:38:41 <takahashi-tsc> Thanks, basically seems good. And our team will also discuss and give feedback later.
08:38:51 <yoshito-ito> Great, thank you!
08:39:39 <takahashi-tsc> OK, I'll also talked about updating legacy Tacker docs.
08:42:06 <yoshito-ito> Thank you! That's all from me for today.
08:42:36 <takahashi-tsc> OK thanks. Any other topics everyone?
08:43:11 <masazumi-ota> I have no topic.
08:45:02 <takahashi-tsc> OK, let's close the meeting. Thank you!
08:45:20 <yoshito-ito> Thank you! bye!
08:45:38 <takahashi-tsc> #endmeeting