08:03:28 <yasufum> #startmeeting tacker
08:03:29 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Feb  9 08:03:28 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is yasufum. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
08:03:30 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
08:03:32 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'tacker'
08:04:04 <yasufum> We have two topics today from our etherpad
08:04:08 <yasufum> link: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tacker-meeting
08:04:56 <yasufum> LiangLu: Can you start?
08:05:14 <LiangLu> yes
08:05:50 <LiangLu> My topic is invite reviews for UT coverage patches
08:06:39 <LiangLu> These patches aims to improve some existing tacker code's UT coverage
08:06:48 <LiangLu> and here is the blueprint:https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tacker/+spec/improve-ut-coverage
08:08:10 <LiangLu> I classified files by function, and set priority for each functions.
08:08:53 <LiangLu> And I have uploaded 4 patches for high-priority files
08:09:40 <LiangLu> I'd like to invite code review for these patches(links are written at etherpad)
08:11:23 <yasufum> thanks
08:12:11 <LiangLu> and some of these patch have conflict at merge, and even 1 is failed to pep8 check.. It is helpful to review it by link order. (I will solve the problem soon :))
08:16:13 <yasufum> It looks a little bit large amount of files… What do you think to divide it if it take a long time?
08:16:48 <yasufum> Because it might be hard to track your progress of the task.
08:17:21 <yasufum> Or does it takes not so much time to complete?
08:18:51 <LiangLu> I agree with you, although I divided them into several groups(patches) by functional
08:21:00 <LiangLu> it is still not a small mount for each patch, also the whole blueprint target is large
08:21:27 <yasufum> yes
08:22:40 <LiangLu> At least, I want to finish High and Medium priority files at Wallaby release
08:23:10 <yasufum> OK
08:25:09 <yasufum> Please update commit message in your patches to add blueprint tag after you separate your blueprint.
08:25:31 <yasufum> Any other comment?
08:25:34 <LiangLu> OK, got it
08:25:44 <yasufum> LiangLu: thanks!
08:27:28 <yasufum> Oops, I have forgotten to set topic …
08:27:38 <yasufum> I would like to go to the nex topic.
08:28:15 <yasufum> #topic heat-translator tosca-parser core
08:28:54 <takahashi-tsc> This is just FYI, I've confirmed that some members are already added into heat-translator/tosca-parser core team.
08:29:27 <yasufum> Was there any announcement on ML?
08:30:54 <takahashi-tsc> Hmm... maybe no, individual mail to each member in order to proposal. And I just confirm gerrit page.
08:33:14 <takahashi-tsc> At least, I can put +2 for tosca-parser. And we can see the core member on gerrit
08:33:15 <takahashi-tsc> https://review.opendev.org/admin/groups/1f7855baf3cf14fedf72e443eef18d844bcd43fa,members
08:34:04 <yasufum> OK, thanks
08:34:21 <yasufum> I have confirmed that I can do that as same.
08:34:50 <takahashi-tsc> Let's activate the projects! I'll thank Bob later.
08:35:11 <yasufum> thanks
08:35:51 <yasufum> Please continue to contribute for the teams
08:36:29 <yasufum> If no more comments, go to the third topic.
08:36:39 <yasufum> #topic FT for K8s-MgmtDriver
08:37:18 <yoshito-ito> yasufum: thanks
08:38:17 <yoshito-ito> I'd like to ask your comments for skipping FT for K8s-MgmtDriver.
08:38:53 <yoshito-ito> Our team are now implementing K8s-MgmtDriver for K8s clusters on OpenStack-VIM.
08:39:18 <yoshito-ito> Our patch is almost done, but we found it's tricky to implement FT for it.
08:39:34 <yoshito-ito> There are two issues:
08:39:41 <yoshito-ito> 1. Not sure how to connect to VMs from tacker-controller
08:39:48 <yoshito-ito> 2. Not sure how to connect to the Internet from VMs
08:40:27 <yoshito-ito> Both of them are highly depends on the Zuul env, and seems hard to achieve now.
08:41:16 <yoshito-ito> So I'd like to upload our K8s-MgmtDriver as just a sample for MgmtDriver introduction document.
08:42:01 <yoshito-ito> In that case, our K8s-MgmtDriver is published as sample in Tacker repo, and we don't have FT for it. Users can download our sample and try to run on their envs.
08:42:36 <yoshito-ito> Do you have any comments or questions?
08:44:14 <yasufum> Did you already uploaded a WIP patch?
08:44:49 <yoshito-ito> Yes, we have three WIP patches on the Gerrit.
08:45:38 <yoshito-ito> I think I need to make those to be re-structured to be a single MgmtDriver file.
08:47:59 <takahashi-tsc> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tacker/+/772693/1
08:47:59 <takahashi-tsc> This one and this parents?
08:48:15 <yoshito-ito> let me see...
08:48:51 <yoshito-ito> takahashi-tsc: Yes, exactly.
08:49:05 <yoshito-ito> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tacker/+/771434
08:49:10 <yoshito-ito> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tacker/+/771805
08:50:24 <yoshito-ito> These three.
08:53:10 <yoshito-ito> I planned to implement 5 use cases for K8s-MgmtDriver (deploy-k8s/HA k8s/Scale worker/Heal nodes/Pod affinity), but I'll put them in the sample.
08:57:52 <takahashi-tsc> Basically, we do not have to make functional tests for sample... From such point of view, are there any FT which still have problems?
08:59:03 <yoshito-ito> No. So let me move to make the sample patch with documents for MgmtDriver.
09:00:56 <takahashi-tsc> OK... but It's just my opinion. I'd like to know others' opinion.
09:01:53 <yoshito-ito> Yes, it's important to hear from others. How about you, other members?
09:02:22 <yasufum> It might the first case having such a samples in our doc, but I think it is OK.
09:03:11 <yoshito-ito> Might be the second case. We have OpenWRT MgmtDriver for legacy implementaion.
09:03:32 <yoshito-ito> (It seems not working, though.)
09:05:11 <LiangLu> I agree with it
09:07:12 <yasufum> OK, thanks
09:07:39 <yasufum> It is the end of the time, but do you any other topic?
09:07:50 <ueha> Just asking for reviewing. [Support CNF scale operations based on ETSI NFV] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tacker/+/765786
09:08:16 <ueha> There is a merge conflict now, so I will rebase and resolve merge conflict soon. Thanks!
09:09:00 <yasufum> OK
09:09:32 <yasufum> takahashi-tsc: Can you review this one quickly?
09:09:36 <yasufum> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tacker/+/774388
09:09:54 <takahashi-tsc> Sure
09:10:19 <yasufum> it is for fixing recent errors in FT for nfvo separate
09:10:24 <yasufum> thanks
09:11:19 <yasufum> It seems enough today.
09:11:29 <yasufum> Thank you for joining. Bye!
09:11:38 <yoshito-ito> bye!
09:11:46 <ueha> thanks! bye
09:11:52 <yasufum> #endmeeting