08:01:47 <yasufum> #startmeeting tacker
08:01:48 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Jun  1 08:01:47 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is yasufum. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
08:01:49 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
08:01:51 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'tacker'
08:03:12 * yasufum #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tacker-meeting
08:03:53 <yasufum> We have two topics today
08:04:43 <yasufum> The second one is just a FYI, updating docs for oftc
08:04:57 <takahashi-tsc> Thanks
08:05:11 <yasufum> I have uploaded a patch for the change
08:05:51 <yasufum> ueha: can you start from your topic?
08:06:14 <ueha> Thanks, I reviewed the patch and already +1!
08:06:17 <ueha> Yes.
08:06:43 <ueha> I have a topic about the patch for resolving FT error we discussed last week.
08:06:52 <ueha> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tacker/+/791252
08:07:00 <ueha> Let me report on the progress.
08:07:22 <ueha> As of patchset 8, all but sol-Kubernetes job were successful.
08:08:07 <ueha> There is other problem with the sol-Kubernetes job, it seems to be occurred by kuryr-kubernetes patch [4] that changes to use kubeadm for installing Kubernetes on devstack.
08:08:24 <ueha> [4] "Use kubeadm for installing Kubernetes on devstack.": https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kuryr-kubernetes/+/779250
08:08:50 <ueha> Merged on May 25.
08:09:25 <ueha> I tried changing the setting of ".zuul.yaml" to use kubeadm, but it didn't work now.
08:10:38 <ueha> And the multi node job is failed but merged patch of kuryr-kubernetes [4]. The patch for fixing mutinode job was merged, but multinode job still fails in the patch.
08:11:15 <ueha> Enable multinode gate: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kuryr-kubernetes/+/791915
08:12:15 <ueha> It will take a while to solve it..
08:13:53 <ueha> I have question and suggestion.
08:14:36 <ueha> Should we temporarily remove sol-kubenetes job from voting?
08:15:21 <ueha> Or should we temporarily use kuryr-kubernetes stable branch (e.g. wallaby) instead of master branch?
08:16:37 <ueha> That all. Any comments or question?
08:18:20 <yasufum> Could I confirm “It will take a while to solve it..  “?
08:19:02 <ueha> Sure
08:22:31 <yasufum> There is no solution proposed for fixing the issue yet?
08:23:38 <ueha> Yes, it seems that a patch has not been posted yet.
08:26:18 <yasufum> I am not sure that your patch is passed if the issue of kuryr-kubernetes is fixed.
08:27:20 <yasufum> Is there the same error occurred between on your test result and kuryr-kubernetes?
08:29:20 <ueha> No, I don't see the same error, so I don't think the kuryr-Kubernetes fix will make it work.
08:29:48 <yasufum> possibly?
08:30:03 <ueha> Sorry for the confusion. Yes, possibly.
08:31:49 <ueha> I feel like I'm stuck with another error before going to that one.
08:32:31 <yasufum> thanks
08:33:05 <yasufum> I have got understood the situation from your log…
08:33:56 <ueha> I just report the bug to kuryr-kubernetes: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kuryr-kubernetes/+bug/1930368
08:33:58 <opendevmeet> Launchpad bug 1930368 in kuryr-kubernetes "go command not found when "KURYR_K8S_CONTAINERIZED_DEPLOYMENT: false"" [Undecided,New] - Assigned to Roman Dobosz (roman-dobosz)
08:35:12 <ueha> If this bug is fixed, it might work well or failed multinode job..
08:37:01 <yasufum> Umm
08:37:17 <ueha> I don't know when the modification will be finished because other projects are involved.
08:37:34 <ueha> So I would like to discuss what to do with sol-Kubernetes jobs.
08:38:28 <takahashi-tsc> Probably, we cannot make conclusion at this meeting... So should we discuss ueha's question, i.e. disable sol-kubernetes or use stable kuryr-kubernetes
08:38:36 <takahashi-tsc> ?
08:39:22 <yasufum> Anyway, it might be unstable for the changes to migrate to OVN, and fixes are expected to be uploaded.
08:40:00 <yasufum> I think it is better to wait the fixes for a while before dropping our test temporary.
08:41:09 <ueha> Okay. Are there any patches that need to be merged urgently?
08:42:21 <ueha> And I will try to make it a stable branch once and see if it works.
08:43:14 <takahashi-tsc> you mean, use kuryr-kubernetes stable/wallaby?
08:43:52 <ueha> Yes
08:44:46 <ueha> May It not be easy to change in the zuul test..?
08:45:07 <takahashi-tsc> OK. I think it is good. But what is next step if it works? We proceed with tacker development with wallaby kuryr-kubernetes?
08:47:36 <yasufum> It’s acceptable as a temporal solution, but not for tacker “xena” release.
08:48:01 <yasufum> So, we should fix it for anyway.
08:49:34 <ueha> I think so, I will try to find a solution until IRC next week. Let me report it again.
08:49:46 <takahashi-tsc> OK, I write conclusion in etherpad L61-
08:49:49 <takahashi-tsc> Is it correct?
08:51:29 <yasufum> thanks
08:51:30 <ueha> Thank you! I think it is correct.
08:52:02 <takahashi-tsc> OK thanks, let's continue to discuss it.
08:54:37 <yasufum> It seems done for the topic today.
08:54:48 <yasufum> Is there any other topic?
08:55:03 <takahashi-tsc> not from my side
08:55:25 <masaki-ueno> me too
08:55:46 <yasufum> good
08:56:24 <yasufum> I’d like to close this meeting.
08:56:35 <yasufum> Thank you for joining, bye
08:56:44 <ueha> Thanks! bye
08:56:46 <takahashi-tsc> thanks bye
08:56:47 <masaki-ueno> thank you, bye
08:56:57 <yasufum> #endmeeting