08:18:53 <ueha> #startmeeting tacker
08:18:53 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Apr 12 08:18:53 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is ueha. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
08:18:53 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
08:18:53 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'tacker'
08:19:38 <ueha> we have two topics in etherpad. https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tacker-meeting
08:20:16 <ueha> 1st topic is about spec freeze, but is it better when yasufum is here?
08:21:43 <ueha> hi yasufum, are you okay..?
08:22:39 <ueha> Or automatic connection?
08:23:00 <takahashi-tsc> I think almost of the members here have agreed with my proposal (spec freeze on end of June). Yes, I'd like to share the conclusion with yasufum.
08:23:51 <takahashi-tsc> So... yes, does yasufum join now...>
08:23:53 <takahashi-tsc> ?
08:24:36 <yasufum> hi, sorry for the late.
08:26:32 <ueha> good, we are starting a meeting and now is 1st topic.
08:27:35 <yasufum> ok
08:28:13 <ueha> > I think almost of the members here have agreed with my proposal (spec freeze on end of June). Yes, I'd like to share the conclusion with yasufum.
08:28:35 <ueha> Is there any comment?
08:28:52 <yasufum> sound good
08:28:53 <takahashi-tsc> Thanks ueha. Yes, I proposed it at PTG. Basicaly there is no objection. yasufum, what do you think?
08:29:04 <takahashi-tsc> OK, Thanks
08:30:01 <ueha> Thanks, any other comment?
08:30:46 <ueha> good, the next topic is my topic.
08:31:38 <ueha> About current Zuul UT/FT error occured from April 4.
08:32:24 <ueha> The kubernetes error has been reported on several patches.
08:32:34 <ueha> This is because the Kubernetes client has been upgraded (from v22.6.0 to v23.3.0) in openstack/requirements [1].
08:32:43 <ueha> [1] https://opendev.org/openstack/requirements/commit/ebba5ca1181490597366d79416bc65b49aa4450b
08:33:45 <ueha> Added value validation when creating object from v23.3.0, and it failed to validate at object initialization in KubernetesInfraDriver.
08:34:23 <ueha> We have been posted the patch to resolve this error.
08:34:30 <ueha> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tacker/+/837081
08:34:47 <ueha> There is currently no error and Zuul+1. Please kindly review this patch.
08:34:59 <ueha> That's all from my side.
08:35:17 <ueha> Any comment or question?
08:37:43 <yasufum> Thanks for the fix
08:38:27 <yasufum> By the way, can you tell me why this test does not use "node.yaml" actually?
08:40:39 <ueha> Sorry, where are you seeing and commenting?
08:40:42 <yasufum> This yaml definition is used to initialize k8s obj at the start of the test, but not used, right?
08:41:17 <yasufum> My understanding is incorrect?
08:42:45 <ueha> I got your point.
08:43:40 <ueha> I think the current implementation creates an empty Object to populate it before using yaml.
08:44:55 <ueha> This implementation is only for V1 API.
08:47:30 <ueha> Validation failed because an empty string was specified when creating an empty initial object.
08:50:44 <yasufum> The empty string was specified while evaluating "must_param", right?
08:51:09 <ueha> Yes, right.
08:51:25 <yasufum> I think the definition of yaml is overwritten with must_param.
08:52:00 <yasufum> And it's the reason why I'm asking about it.
08:52:53 <yasufum> It's tricky a little, so I'd appreciate if you revise such a implementation.
08:53:09 <yasufum> Or, giving some comment is enough for a quick fix.
08:53:56 <yasufum> Anyway, it might be better to continue on gerrit.
08:54:03 <yasufum> Thanks.
08:54:35 <ueha> This patch changed to an implementation that does not use `must_param`.
08:55:30 <ueha> So, If you have any comments after reviewing, please give comments to the patch. thanks!
08:56:58 <ueha> Any other comment?
08:57:41 <ma-ooyama> Sorry, I have one comment about previous PTG. Is it OK?
08:57:56 <yasufum> sure
08:58:03 <ma-ooyama> In previous PTG, I said I would share the reason why we are using Tacker as N-Act cluster.
08:58:25 <ma-ooyama> I'm now confirming that with our team, and so let me share our opinion in next IRC meeting.
08:58:39 <ma-ooyama> In addition, we are also discussing other topics shared in PTG.
08:58:53 <ma-ooyama> I would like to share our opinion about those in next IRC meeting too.
08:59:08 <ma-ooyama> This is just the notification in advance, thank you.
08:59:45 <yasufum> Thanks.
09:02:11 <yasufum> All topics done for today?
09:02:36 <ueha> Yes, I think so.
09:03:33 <yasufum> OK
09:03:55 <yasufum> Sorry again for the late, and thanks for joining.
09:04:01 <yasufum> bye
09:04:10 <ma-ooyama> Thanks, bye
09:04:10 <manpreetk> bye
09:04:11 <ueha> thanks, bye
09:04:15 <yaoying> bye
09:04:15 <takahashi-tsc> Thanks bye!
09:04:17 <caishuwen> bye
09:04:18 <h_asahina> bye
09:04:19 <yu-kinjo> Thanks, bye
09:04:23 <masaki-ueno> bye
09:04:27 <Ramona-ho-xu> bye
09:04:34 <yasufum> #endmeeting
09:05:06 <ueha> #endmeeting