08:01:21 <yasufum> #startmeeting tacker
08:01:21 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Nov 22 08:01:21 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is yasufum. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
08:01:21 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
08:01:21 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'tacker'
08:01:39 <manpreetk> hi
08:01:50 <yasufum> hi
08:01:53 <yasufum> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tacker-meeting
08:03:11 <yasufum> We have one item on the etherpad today for which we didn't have enough time to discuss last week.
08:03:44 <yasufum> #topic Legacy API deprecation
08:04:11 <yasufum> ueha: Do you have any update anyway?
08:04:39 <yasufum> although we agree to continue at the last.
08:05:26 <ueha> Yes, I added "Legacy FTs deprecation" to this suggestion roadmap as yuta-kazato suggested.
08:05:52 <ueha> Thank you, kazato-san.
08:05:58 <yasufum> here?
08:06:00 <yasufum> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tacker-legacy-deprecation
08:06:21 <ueha> Yes, L63~64
08:07:34 <yuta-kazato> Thank you for your cooperation! +1
08:08:37 <ueha> If there is no objection, I'll send about the Legacy API deprecation topic to Discuss-ML to see if anyone is using it.
08:09:55 <hiromu> +1
08:12:07 <yasufum> discussion?
08:12:15 <yasufum> or all of us agree?
08:13:34 <manpreetk> Just want to know we would take care of tacker-horizon as well. As it totally support legacy API.
08:14:22 <ueha> I was also a little concerned it.
08:15:24 <manpreetk> Hmm not sure how many user would be there using tacker-horizon.
08:16:44 <ueha> I think we may also need to obsolete it when Legacy API becomes obsolete (c cycle).
08:17:13 <yasufum> takahashi-tsc: By the way, no change is required for ETSI TST test?
08:17:36 <yasufum> Nothing depend on the legacy apis?
08:17:44 <manpreetk> ueha: Yup think so, we have to discontinue, or enhance tacker-horizon to support SOL APIs.
08:18:08 <takahashi-tsc> No need to change, ETSI TST testset includes only SOL-based API.
08:18:16 <yasufum> good
08:18:24 <ueha> When I send email to Disscuss ML, also I will hear about Tacker-horizon.
08:18:38 <manpreetk> thanks
08:20:27 <ueha> manpreetk: I don't think the need for SOL-API support of Tacker-Horizon has been discussed yet. right?
08:21:18 <manpreetk> ueha: There was a proposal in last Zed PTG by asahina-san.
08:22:01 <manpreetk> hiromu: Hope I am correct, to enhance tacker-horizon.
08:23:54 <ueha> Sorry I missed it, https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tacker-zed-ptg#L75
08:24:22 <ueha> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tacker/+spec/enhance-tacker-horizon
08:24:28 <manpreetk> yes this one
08:25:30 <ueha> but, I think there is no progress of this blueprint in Zed cycle
08:26:36 <ueha> So, first, I will hear if users using the Legacy API from Tacker-Horizon.
08:26:51 <yasufum> +1
08:28:32 <yasufum> Any other comment?
08:29:33 <yasufum> good
08:29:48 <yasufum> ueha: I'd appreciate if you update your etherpad for the comments from team. Thanks!
08:30:17 <ueha> Sure, I will update!
08:31:24 <yasufum> Is there any topic other than on the etherpad?
08:31:37 <yasufum> Or close this meeting?
08:31:39 <manpreetk> This is regarding migration of tacker jobs to Ubuntu Jammy (22.04), the proposed patch [1] temporary disables "ceilometer" as it was failing tacker gate jobs.
08:31:39 <manpreetk> In parallel I have open a new patch [2] to debug tacker gate jobs enabling "Ceilometer".
08:31:39 <manpreetk> [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tacker/+/861137
08:31:39 <manpreetk> [2] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tacker/+/865234
08:31:40 <manpreetk> IMO, we can merge patch [1] once it Zuul gate jobs pass without ceilometer. WDYT?
08:32:40 <manpreetk> I would like to know team view about above suggestion. Thanks!!!
08:33:08 <yasufum> let's me confirm ...
08:37:36 <yasufum> It looks good for now, but please let me check and reply later.
08:37:38 <yasufum> Thanks.
08:37:52 <manpreetk> Thanks for help!!
08:38:36 <manpreetk> Thats all from my side.
08:38:43 <yasufum> ok, thanks
08:38:51 <yasufum> other topic?
08:39:54 <yasufum> manpreetk: By the way, have you checked if you can change status of bug report on launchpad by yourself?
08:40:19 <yasufum> to "Won't fix"
08:40:41 <manpreetk> Sorry I haven't, i ll let you know soon.
08:41:17 <yasufum> OK
08:42:21 <yasufum> It seems enough for today.
08:42:31 <yasufum> So, let's close this meeting.
08:42:40 <yasufum> Thanks for joining, bye!
08:42:42 <manpreetk> Thanks!! Bye!!
08:42:46 <ueha> Thanks, bye
08:43:08 <yasufum> #endmeeting