08:01:07 <yasufum0> #startmeeting tacker
08:01:07 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Jan 31 08:01:07 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is yasufum0. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
08:01:07 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
08:01:07 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'tacker'
08:02:24 <yasufum0> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tacker-meeting
08:03:21 <yasufum0> There are two topic for today.
08:03:47 <yasufum0> The first one is just a reminder for the next vPTG.
08:04:51 <yasufum0> We are going to have sessions for the next release March 27th through March 31st
08:05:18 <yasufum0> Although two or three days is enough for us.
08:05:34 <yasufum0> Anyway, I've registered as a tacker team to join the meeting.
08:06:00 <yasufum0> So, please join for the event with your proposals.
08:06:27 <yasufum0> I'd like to move on to the next topic if no comment for the imte.
08:07:11 <yasufum0> good
08:07:20 <yasufum0> #topic Retiring untested and unmaintained modules (murano, rally and tacker)
08:08:15 <yasufum0> A suggestion for dropping support for some modules from puppet team in few days ago.
08:08:26 <yasufum0> including tacker-puppet.
08:09:31 <yasufum0> I've noticed the module might be required by some users possibly, but not sure for now
08:09:50 <yasufum0> to avoid the module going to be dropped soon.
08:11:02 <yasufum0> So, we should confirm the module is actually needed for tacker, and discuss who can help maintaining the module if it's true.
08:11:11 <yasufum0> asap
08:12:15 <yasufum0> Do you guys have any comment for now?
08:14:25 <takahashi-tsc> Actually, we do not use puppet for Tacker... it is OK to drop it.
08:14:53 <takahashi-tsc> It is just my personal opinion... I'd like to know others' one.
08:16:37 <ueha_> We don't use it at this time too.
08:17:08 <ueha_> Redhat openstack platform seems to use "puppet" as a core component, but so far we have not use it for Tacker.
08:17:14 <ueha_> https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_openstack_platform/9/html/partner_integration/architecture#Architecture-Core-Puppet
08:18:12 <ueha_> For now, I don't think it's a problem to drop it, but this is also my personal opinion. that's all from my side.
08:18:28 <yasufum0> IMO, we'd better to keep the module for a possibility if someone will want to use it in a future.
08:20:55 <yuta-kazato> I also found that puppet-tacker was already removed from TripleO..
08:21:49 <yuta-kazato> #link https://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-puppet-elements/commit/67b7451d9216307cd5ceb4389f2feaf25434dcb6
08:23:53 <yuta-kazato> (because Tacker is no longer supported by TripleO)
08:26:07 <ueha_> If user want to use puppet-tacker with Triple-O, we already haven't needed to maintenance it if it's removed from Triple-O... ?
08:27:06 <yasufum0> I'm not sure how tacker-puppet depends on tripleo at least...
08:29:41 <yasufum0> Anyway, I'd like to understand just a little bit more about these projects before making the decision.
08:30:07 <yasufum0> Thanks for your comments.
08:31:37 <yasufum0> I think all topic done for today if no one has extra items.
08:33:24 <yasufum0> good
08:33:40 <yasufum0> Let's close this meeting.
08:33:49 <yasufum0> Thanks for joining, bye!
08:33:54 <takahashi-tsc> Bye
08:33:57 <ueha_> Thanks, bye
08:33:58 <ma-ooyama> bye
08:33:59 <w-juso> bye
08:34:07 <yasufum0> #endmeeting