08:02:19 <yasufum-o> #startmeeting tacker
08:02:19 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Apr 11 08:02:19 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is yasufum-o. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
08:02:19 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
08:02:19 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'tacker'
08:02:38 <yasufum-o> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tacker-meeting
08:03:05 <yuta-kazato> hi
08:04:20 <yasufum-o> hi
08:04:39 <yasufum-o> looking the etherpad...
08:05:16 <yasufum-o> There are two items and proposed yu-kinjo for both
08:05:31 <yasufum-o> Can you start to share your topics?
08:05:44 <yu-kinjo> Sure
08:06:22 <yu-kinjo> Last week, I posted 1 blue print and 1 bug report.
08:06:49 <yu-kinjo> The blueprint is https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tacker/+spec/modify-get-stack-name
08:07:11 <yu-kinjo> In Zed , db migration command from v1 api to v2 api is developped.
08:07:28 <yu-kinjo> However, LCM operation by v2 api for these upgraded VNF does not work.
08:09:04 <yu-kinjo> I want to modify code to work lcm operation for VNF migrated v1 to v2.
08:09:23 <yu-kinjo> I am planning to investigate and implement the solution going forward.
08:09:40 <yu-kinjo> I may consult with you regarding the implementation approach as needed in IRC and would appreciate your review after the implementation.
08:10:37 <yu-kinjo> That's it. Does anyone has comment or question about this blueprint?
08:11:35 <yasufum-o> thanks
08:11:39 <yasufum-o> any comment?
08:14:30 <yasufum-o> It's seems no objection for the proposal at least.
08:15:38 <yu-kinjo> Thank you,
08:17:24 <yu-kinjo> I would like to consult here when implementing.
08:17:49 <yu-kinjo> Next topic is bug report https://bugs.launchpad.net/tacker/+bug/2013477
08:19:59 <yu-kinjo> Now, different tenants cannot onboard the same VNF package even when they want to use same VNF package.
08:20:58 <yu-kinjo> Of course, one tenant shoud not be onboard VNF packages with same VNFD id.
08:23:50 <yu-kinjo> However, duplication of VNFD IDs among different tenants should be allowed to support cases that different tenants want to use same VNF package.
08:24:52 <yu-kinjo> I wnat to modify code to achieve this.
08:25:10 <yu-kinjo> Now, I plan to investigate and implement a solution for this as well.
08:25:49 <yu-kinjo> I would appreciate it if you could get on the consultation here and review after implementation.
08:26:05 <yu-kinjo> Does anyone has comments or question?
08:29:47 <ueha> Thank you, I have one comment.
08:30:19 <ueha> We support the policy enhanement in antelope cycle.
08:30:26 <ueha> https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/tacker-specs/specs/2023.1/enhance-tacker-policy.html#vnf-package-api-processes-to-be-changed
08:31:10 <ueha> If policy enhancement is enabled, I think the "vendor" should also be considered.
08:31:44 <ueha> What do you think?
08:32:14 <yu-kinjo> Thank you for your comment.
08:32:34 <yu-kinjo> I am checking the document...
08:36:43 <yu-kinjo> I did not consider about "vendor". I want to take time to check this spec and collect my thought.
08:38:00 <ueha> thanks, let's talk on IRC again :)
08:38:06 <yu-kinjo> In next IRC, I want to share my thoughts. Is that OK?
08:38:09 <yu-kinjo> Thank you
08:38:58 <yuta-kazato> we also added usage guide for enhanced api policy too.
08:39:06 <yuta-kazato> #link: https://docs.openstack.org/tacker/latest/user/enhanced_tacker_policy_usage_guide.html
08:39:26 <yuta-kazato> Please kindly check it, thanks.
08:39:42 <yu-kinjo> Thank you, I will also check it
08:42:59 <yasufum-o> Is there any other comment?
08:44:59 <yuta-kaz_> I have one question.
08:45:20 <yasufum-o> yes, please.
08:46:10 <yuta-kaz_> Is this bug report for v1API, v2API or common Tacker problems?
08:48:14 <yu-kinjo> Thank you for question.
08:49:53 <yu-kinjo> I confirmed this problem for v1 API. For v2API, I did not check whether there is same problem.
08:52:47 <yuta-kaz_> Thanks for your answer, I understood the situation.
08:53:06 <yuta-kaz_> I will check the case of v2API and share the results in IRC if possible.
08:53:40 <yu-kinjo> Thank you :)
08:55:09 <yasufum-o> OK, thanks
08:55:40 <yasufum-o> yu-kinjo: please give us your update on the next weekly meeting or later.
08:56:29 <yu-kinjo> OK. Thanks.
08:57:30 <yasufum-o> So, let's close this meeting if no more comments.
08:58:13 <ueha> Sorry for the last time. In my understanding, this problem occurs during VNF Package uploading, and Tacker's local NFVO feature related with VNF package managing is supported in only V1 API.
09:00:22 <ueha> In case of external NFVO, I think it is not supported by Tacker. I would appreciate it if you could consider this comment. Let's discuss next week.
09:01:35 <yuta-kaz_> Thanks, I agree with ueha-san.
09:02:25 <yu-kinjo> Thank you for your comment. I would like to consider this comment and discuss next week.
09:03:13 <ueha> Thank you.
09:04:16 <yasufum-o> thanks for your comment.
09:05:25 <yasufum-o> Is that all?
09:06:12 <yasufum-o> good
09:06:56 <yasufum-o> Please continue discussion for the proposals next week.
09:07:16 <yasufum-o> Thank you for joining today.
09:07:22 <yasufum-o> Bye!
09:07:22 <ueha> Thanks, bye.
09:07:25 <manpreetk_> bye.
09:07:35 <ma-ooyama> thanks.
09:07:42 <yasufum-o> #endmeeting