08:01:41 #startmeeting tacker 08:01:41 Meeting started Tue Sep 5 08:01:41 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is yasufum-o. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 08:01:41 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 08:01:41 The meeting name has been set to 'tacker' 08:02:08 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tacker-meeting 08:03:20 So, two items on the etherpad today. 08:04:01 #topic Sharing about current Zuul Centos jobs error 08:04:13 Let's start from the first item. 08:05:56 Renu: Are you joining? 08:07:33 Oops, I have confirmed with Renu and she is joining incorrect channel. 08:07:41 Sorry but please wait a minutes... 08:07:51 ok 08:08:22 Hello everyone 08:08:41 hi 08:08:46 This is for the topic "Sharing about current Zuul Centos jobs error (Renu, 2023/09/05 IRC)" 08:09:41 We observed an issue realted ensure-java role for our zuul build job 08:11:00 Bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/tacker/+bug/2033755 has been opened for the same. 08:15:39 we would like to know Is there a problem with our policy? 08:16:33 please share your opinion 08:18:07 thanks 08:19:04 Is it just a problem in the playbook and not in tacker itself? 08:19:37 #link https://opendev.org/zuul/zuul-jobs/src/commit/be0415e556aa183dc425a386cb07e0f681f5ca56/roles/ensure-java 08:21:03 yes .. ensure-java is a role 08:21:19 need to fix in playbook of zuul job 08:22:08 Although I'm not sure the exact behavior of "package:" directive, is there any other alternative for centos env? 08:22:19 The fix required in "https://opendev.org/zuul/zuul-jobs/src/branch/master/roles/ensure-java" 08:22:48 yeah, I think it might be so. 08:24:23 renu: I have a question and suggestion. 08:24:52 If the "ensure-java" role is required only by the compliance test job, then there is a way to make it run only in the compliance test job. 08:25:12 If "ensure-java" role isn't really need for other jobs, can't you do it that way? 08:25:46 I think need to open bug in zuul-jobs and in parallel fix to install java in tox of compliance test 08:26:20 Ueha san , we agree with your point. 08:29:46 however having said that, I think the "ensure-java" role should be fixed for the future. 08:30:55 But if you don't use it in our test by my suggestion, I think you can give it a lower priority. 08:31:07 Ueha san , currently this is part of tacker/playbooks/devstack/pre.yaml which is first step for environment preparation. 08:31:50 will it be ok to comment it in tacker/playbooks/devstack/pre.yaml and fix in tox of compliance. 08:32:48 In parallel will open an issue in zuul 08:33:50 sorry, does `in tox of complience` mean the "in another patch (fixing for complience patch)"? 08:33:58 like https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tacker/+/888757 ? 08:34:10 or new patch? 08:36:04 Fix in patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tacker/+/852125 , itself 08:37:01 Thanks. Yeah, I think it is okay to fix in CentOS testing patch. 08:37:20 In parallel will open bug in zuul and accordingly update tacker open bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/tacker/+bug/2033755 08:38:17 Thanks Ueha san for your input. 08:39:19 You're welcome. 08:40:33 yasufum-o: Is that policy okay? If you have any comments, please let us know. 08:41:22 Can I confirm how to fix the issue? 08:41:54 Just dropping the task "ensure-java"? 08:42:08 for a while? 08:43:37 I think "dropping the ensure-java role" is not correct. 08:44:16 "Fix to run "ensure-java" role when only complience test job" is correct. 08:45:35 by adding env value of centos jobs to .zuul.yaml, and add a condition to be run "ensure-java" role. 08:46:00 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tacker/+/852125/22/playbooks/devstack/pre.yaml#24 08:47:19 renu: Please let me know if my understanding is wrong. 08:47:31 yes , correct 08:48:50 will make an environment variable if centos env then ensure-java role will not run . The java will be installed from compliance test in tox.ini . 08:48:52 OK, making it conditional, agree. 08:50:53 Any other comment, or go to the next topic? 08:50:54 only one confirmation can we do fix in patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tacker/+/852125 itself 08:51:21 LGTM 08:51:28 ok thanks 08:53:04 So, second topic is just a request 08:54:41 RC1 target week is Sep 11-15 08:55:33 There are several patches are still remained, 08:57:12 Let's us know if any other patches should be fixed soon 08:58:34 Anyway, many thanks for your help for reviewing. 09:00:00 OK, it seems enough for today, but is there any other comment? 09:00:16 Or close this meeting? 09:01:07 takahashi-tsc: There are some patches that I have posted and are ready for review, so please kindly review them. 09:01:33 ueha: Sire, sorry for the late... 09:02:00 No problem, thank you :) 09:02:42 thx 09:02:46 That's all from myside, thank you. 09:02:52 good 09:02:59 Let's close the meeting. 09:03:06 Thanks for joining, bye! 09:03:12 thanks, bye 09:03:38 #endmeeting