08:03:24 <yasufum> #startmeeting tacker
08:03:24 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Mar  5 08:03:24 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is yasufum. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
08:03:24 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
08:03:24 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'tacker'
08:03:49 <yasufum> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tacker-meeting
08:03:57 <yasufum> hi
08:03:59 <takahashi-tsc> hi
08:04:27 <yasufum> So, let's start this meeting.
08:04:56 <yasufum> There are five items here on the etherpad.
08:05:06 <yasufum> The first two items are mine.
08:05:21 <yasufum> Both of them are about FFE.
08:07:15 <yasufum> For the first topic of the RBAC, I've not noticed it's required to request FFE actually.
08:09:14 <yasufum> gmann has proposed the request kindly, so I'd like to accept it to merge the patches before the end of this cycle if no opposite from tacker team.
08:09:28 <yasufum> Is there any opinion, or agree?
08:10:45 <yasufum> good
08:11:21 <ueha> +1
08:11:25 <yasufum> It must be everyone agree.
08:11:27 <yasufum> thansk
08:11:48 <yasufum> It's also the same for the second topic.
08:13:00 <yasufum> Although I proposed a spec at the previous PTG for cilium support,
08:13:41 <yasufum> we've met some difficulties for releasing the feature in this cycle.
08:14:35 <yasufum> More exactly, there is some trouble while deploying cilium by management driver with v2 apis.
08:16:03 <yasufum> However, we could avoid it recently, and might be able to upload the patch before the end of this week.
08:16:38 <yasufum> So, I'd like ot request another FFE for the spec.
08:18:02 <yasufum> We're going to send a email for the request on ML later after the meeting.
08:18:45 <yasufum> Thanks.
08:18:56 <yasufum> Is there any comment?
08:20:05 <yasufum> good
08:20:31 <yasufum> It seems we can go to the next item.
08:20:56 <shivam> Hi
08:21:00 <yasufum> hi
08:21:04 <shivam> The next item is a proposal for adding tacker installation guide with openstack-helm in official openstack-helm document.
08:22:45 <yasufum> yes
08:24:01 <shivam> proposed installation guide will be added in official openstack-helm documentation
08:24:14 <shivam> Link: https://docs.openstack.org/openstack-helm/latest/install/deploy_openstack.html
08:25:55 <yasufum> sounds good
08:26:23 <shivam> thanks
08:27:52 <yasufum> By the way, have you already uploaded a candidate patch?
08:28:19 <yasufum> I might have noticed, but missing for now...
08:29:17 <yasufum> or not yet?
08:29:26 <shivam> yes, that patch was meant for adding in official tacker document
08:29:46 <shivam> this one is for adding in official openstack-helm document
08:30:05 <yasufum> OK, thanks
08:30:39 <yasufum> Any other comment, team?
08:31:43 <ueha> I have a comment, I thinks other components need to be installed (like barbican).
08:32:21 <ueha> Will you add the description about related component to openstack-helm's document?
08:32:42 <ueha> or Tacker only?
08:34:54 <shivam> we are doing for tacker only
08:35:28 <shivam> but other components like keystone, glance, barbican etc. needs to be installed
08:35:47 <ueha> It feels like the https://docs.openstack.org/openstack-helm/latest/install/deploy_openstack.html page only lists representative OpenStack projects.
08:36:53 <ueha> keystone and glance ...etc are listed in the page, but tacker's required projects(like barbican) are not listed.
08:37:48 <ueha> I think we should consider whether it is OK to write "only" Tacker.
08:38:08 <ueha> What do you think?
08:39:08 <shivam> we can add barbican component in the document along with tacker
08:40:08 <shivam> because we have installed barbican before installing tacker
08:40:18 <renu> ueha san , our proposal is to add only tacker
08:40:36 <renu> As we are contributor for tacker.
08:43:09 <ueha> I understand we're contributor for Tacker. However, I am concerned about the lack of steps required to make Tacker work..
08:44:12 <renu> If required we can make a note for required pre-requisites
08:45:27 <ueha> Yeah, IMO, I think it is better to write it as a note.
08:47:04 <yasufum> Thanks for the comments.
08:49:22 <yasufum> ueha: can you any other comment for now, or continue on gerrit?
08:49:38 <yasufum> s/can you/do you have/
08:49:56 <ueha> there is no additional comment as for now, so let's continue on gerrit.
08:50:20 <yasufum> thanks
08:50:36 <renu> With the suggestion will participate Tacker installation setps and in note will mention  pre-requisites information
08:51:52 <ueha> thanks
08:52:46 <yasufum> thanks for your suggestion.
08:53:06 <yasufum> So, let's move on to the rest of items.
08:54:17 <yasufum> request for review
08:54:28 <ueha> Yes, the remaining topics are mine.
08:54:43 <ueha> some patches are listed that we requested to review in IRC last week, and I added new two patches.
08:55:13 <ueha> These added patches are for "NFV Orchestration API v2.0 in Tacker Horizon" and "Obsolete Legacy API", respectively.
08:55:24 <ueha> Please kindly review the patches.
08:55:45 <takahashi-tsc> I have started to review them, sorry for the delay.
08:56:26 <ueha> takahashi-tsc: thank you.
08:56:51 <ueha> yasufum: Also, do I need to send an FFE email about the above patches..?
08:59:56 <yasufum> I'm not sure there's any strict rule for that, but it migth be required fro tacker-horize at least.
09:01:32 <yasufum> I think no need for a bug fix, or documentation.
09:02:24 <ueha> Thanks, I will send an request FFE about the above patches without bugfix/documentation later just in case. (Sorry for my knowledge about FFE.
09:03:32 <ueha> any other comments? or can I go to next topic?
09:04:21 <yasufum> Please go to the next item.
09:04:38 <ueha> Thanks. The last topic is about information sharing the current Zuul status.
09:05:03 <ueha> As you may know, the following patch merge fixes an error that occurred a while ago by oslo.db upgrade.
09:05:14 <ueha> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tacker/+/910720
09:05:59 <ueha> However, new issue is occurring now in the job related with k8s, the issue caused by kuryr-kubernetes setup...
09:06:35 <ueha> Also I investigate the cause, and I have already posted bug report and fixed patch to kuryr-kubernetes.
09:07:32 <ueha> Tacker's gate (Functional FT jobs related k8s) will fail until the kuryr-kubernetes's patch is merged, so I will sharing and notice it.
09:07:43 <ueha> That's all from my side
09:08:30 <yasufum> Thanks for your huge contributions.
09:09:28 <yasufum> I hope it will be fixed very soon.
09:10:15 <ueha> Yeah, I hope too. but core of kuryr put CR-1 just now..
09:11:16 <ueha> Anyway, I would like to adjust it somehow so that the gate of tacker passes.
09:11:36 <yasufum> thx
09:11:45 <ueha> If you have any support, please comment below to gerrit.
09:11:46 <ueha> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kuryr-kubernetes/+/910962
09:11:57 <ueha> Thanks
09:14:27 <yasufum> Thanks all for the discussion.
09:14:46 <yasufum> It's already over the end of the time today.
09:14:55 <yasufum> So, I'd like to close this meeting.
09:15:07 <yasufum> Thank you for joining, bye.
09:15:10 <ueha> Thanks, bye
09:15:12 <takahashi-tsc> thanks, bye
09:15:26 <yasufum> #endmeeting