#openstack-meeting: tc

Meeting summary

1. 1. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee (ttx, 20:00:55)
   
   
2. Driver teams: establish new "driver team" concept, or not (ttx, 20:01:26)
   1. https://review.openstack.org/403829 (ttx, 20:01:48)
   2. https://review.openstack.org/403836 (ttx, 20:02:02)
   3. VOTE: Voted on "Where do you stand?" Results are, on-the-fence: 5, allow-driver-teams: 3, just-improve-discovery: 3 (ttx, 20:27:10)
   4. ACTION: ttx and stevemar to reach out to prospective driver teams and assess how much they care about recognition vs. just discoverability (ttx, 20:32:00)
   
   
3. Disallow downtime of controlled resources during upgrades (ttx, 20:32:07)
   1. https://review.openstack.org/404361 (ttx, 20:32:14)
   
   
4. Pike goals (ttx, 20:50:07)
   1. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/community-goals (ttx, 20:50:30)
   
   
5. Open discussion (ttx, 20:57:12)
   1. ACTION: ttx to start a UX thread (ttx, 20:59:35)

Action items

1. ttx and stevemar to reach out to prospective driver teams and assess how much they care about recognition vs. just discoverability
2. ttx to start a UX thread

Action items, by person

1. stevemar
   1. ttx and stevemar to reach out to prospective driver teams and assess how much they care about recognition vs. just discoverability
2. ttx
   1. ttx and stevemar to reach out to prospective driver teams and assess how much they care about recognition vs. just discoverability
   2. ttx to start a UX thread

People present (lines said)

1. ttx (110)
2. dhellmann (58)
3. thingee (45)
4. jroll (31)
5. sdague (30)
6. fungi (29)
7. johnthetubaguy (28)
8. EmilienM (22)
9. mtreinish (15)
10. dims (13)
11. dtroyer (13)
12. dolphm (13)
13. stevemar (11)
14. openstack (10)
15. bswartz (8)
16. smcginnis (3)
17. gordc (1)
18. edleafe (1)
19. sigmavirus (1)