15:00:13 #startmeeting tc 15:00:14 Meeting started Thu Feb 11 15:00:13 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is gmann. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:15 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:00:17 The meeting name has been set to 'tc' 15:00:23 #topic rollcall 15:00:26 I'm here, but on another meeting I have to focus on 15:00:26 o/ 15:00:31 k 15:01:07 o/ 15:01:09 o/ 15:01:17 o/ 15:02:09 let's start 15:02:11 #topic Follow up on past action items 15:02:23 dansmith reach out to ML regarding node usage 15:02:41 #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-February/020235.html 15:02:44 that's been quite the active thread so far. kudos to everyone pitching in 15:02:55 \o/ 15:02:57 yeah, its very helpful 15:03:35 let's talk more on this in its topic section 15:03:36 gmann continue to follow-up on using direct dependencies for l-c jobs 15:03:55 I am still testing with few more services 15:04:01 I will continue on this 15:04:04 #action gmann continue to follow-up on using direct dependencies for l-c jobs 15:04:15 gmann/ricolin reach out to mistral maintainers about PTL for next cycle 15:04:46 we have response form Renat, we can talk more on this in next Topics 15:05:09 #topic Audit SIG list and chairs (diablo_rojo) 15:05:17 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/2021-SIG-Updates 15:05:24 #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-January/019994.html 15:05:40 I still welcome opinions on the etherpad. 15:05:45 diablo_rojo: do we have enough comment on etherpad to proceed ? 15:05:50 I haven't had time to reach out to chairs directly. 15:05:52 k 15:06:08 I should be able to before next meeting 15:06:13 So we can keep this action item 15:06:19 tc-members: please add your input in https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/2021-SIG-Updates 15:06:28 diablo_rojo: great. thanks 15:06:31 o/ 15:06:40 I am here. Sorry, got distraced. 15:06:48 jungleboyj: np! 15:07:04 diablo_rojo: anything else you would like to discuss on SIG things ? 15:08:04 I don't think so. I need to contact a bunch of chairs that didn't reply and the provider openstack team in k8s land 15:08:18 ok 15:08:24 If anyone has opinions about which direction any of these should go, feel free to share them in the etherpad 15:08:28 that's it really 15:09:09 yeah, let's wait for chair response if they do not it is clear that SIG is not active or need different chair. 15:09:27 #topic Gate performance and heavy job configs (dansmith) 15:09:31 #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-February/020235.html 15:09:56 this ML thread is very active and lot of helpful feedback 15:10:44 dansmith: if you would like to highlight or discuss anything? 15:11:01 nope I think it's going well, but touching base in a few weeks would be good 15:11:16 great 15:12:12 also, devstack parallel patch is all ready to go, till now no objection on that. #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/771505/14 15:12:22 woot 15:13:07 #topic Mistral Maintenance (gmann) 15:13:12 #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-February/020137.html 15:13:44 I reached out to Renat and Mistral core team. and got response from Renat about trying the DPL model 15:13:59 I think that is good and feasible call. 15:14:22 +1 15:14:24 +1 15:14:28 +1 15:14:33 nice 15:14:36 although Renat will be there for elp, review, IRC discussion etc 15:14:40 help 15:15:16 during Xena PTL election we can ask them to propose the DPL with required liaisons 15:15:53 I think we do not need any more action or work to do at least until next election 15:16:10 ricolin: anything you would like to add? 15:16:53 gmann, I think your proposal is great, and Renat seems can provide few mins per day to keep tracking 15:17:14 yeah that will be helpful for smooth transition 15:17:58 agree 15:18:04 after meeting, I will remove this topic from agenda. 15:18:23 #topic Student Programs (diablo_rojo) 15:18:28 Google Summer of Code: #link https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/get-started/ 15:18:38 Outreachy: #link https://www.outreachy.org/communities/cfp/ 15:18:47 diablo_rojo: go ahead 15:19:04 So I just wanted to make everyone aware that these opportunities are available. 15:19:35 As a community we have only participated in GSoC once so it would be cool to do so again. 15:19:38 if i understand correctly. if we propose any project/area there we need to provide a mentor also right? 15:19:43 Yes 15:19:47 ok 15:20:07 Generally if you are proposing something you are one of the mentors- you can mentor with another person or two to help share the load 15:20:13 which I have done in the past. 15:20:49 diablo_rojo, How long is the mentorship goes in program? 15:20:53 If anyone is interested but doesn't want to mentor alone, I can help on the general onboarding side, but currently I am already juggling 7 students. 15:21:27 GSoC runs roughly the length of the Northern hemisphere's summer. 15:21:42 And this round of outreachy will be about the same 15:22:05 April/Mayish till August/Septemberish 15:22:10 and how student get assigned there, as per student interest or approved students and then assigned by mentorship committee in distributed way for all proposed area? 15:22:30 Per student interest for Outreachy and I think the same for GSoC 15:22:56 ok. 15:23:22 I will propose QA this time. it is from our upstream opportunity also. let's see if anyone like to do QA :) 15:23:53 When I have run it for storyboard I have seen a flood of interested students that help get a bunch of low hanging fruit done (they have to submit a patch as a part of their application). 15:23:58 I will discuss in QA office hour too and propose accordingly. 15:24:05 Let me know if you have any other questions! 15:24:09 nice 15:24:11 That's all I had for this. 15:24:15 sure. 15:24:31 I think you have sent this on ML also 15:24:44 #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-February/020288.html 15:24:45 this one 15:24:58 the GSOC yes, not outreachy- vkmc was going to handle that 15:25:06 i see 15:25:08 but the links in the agenda will get you there. 15:25:41 yeah 15:26:03 anything else or any other question for diablo_rojo on this? 15:26:50 Nothing else from me 15:27:01 ok. let's move next 15:27:05 #topic k8s Steering Committee Meeting 15:27:14 March 1st from 17:30- 18:30 UTC 15:27:41 this is k8s steering committee meeting and they are inviting us right? 15:27:50 Correct. 15:27:51 last time it was our PTG meeting and they attended 15:27:54 cool 15:28:04 that is great thing 15:28:19 this is last meeting etherpad #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/kubernetes-cross-community-topics 15:28:28 So if there are topics we want to bring to them we shoudl start collecting those. I propose we use the etherpad we started before. 15:28:41 They are also thinking of topics to chat about. 15:28:56 If you are interested in attending, I think I can share the calendar invite. 15:29:09 agree, we can keep appending that etherpad and will be helpful to know the previous discussions or so 15:29:14 just ping me about it 15:29:34 not available at the time but will keep eye on any report, etherpad or ML for the meeting 15:29:36 I plan to start a ML thread about it, but wanted to bring it up here as well 15:29:48 Sounds good. 15:29:57 may be you can add in etherpad (meeting details) and we can add attendees section 15:30:01 I really hope its more than just me attending 15:30:05 yeah +1 on ML 15:30:08 Oh yeah I can certainly do that 15:30:28 thats all I had here if no one has questions 15:30:35 diablo_rojo: do we need to give number of attendees in advance? in case they need preparation on meeting channel or so? 15:30:42 nope 15:30:45 cool 15:31:06 let's collect the topic and interested members in etherpad 15:31:48 #action diablo_rojo to send the 8s steering meeting details on ML and add section for new meeting in etherpad 15:31:59 #undo 15:32:00 Removing item from minutes: #action diablo_rojo to send the 8s steering meeting details on ML and add section for new meeting in etherpad 15:32:02 #action diablo_rojo to send the k8s steering meeting details on ML and add section for new meeting in etherpad 15:32:33 thanks diablo_rojo for bringing and handling that. 15:32:54 My pleasure! 15:33:09 anything else on this topic? 15:33:15 nope 15:33:50 #link Open Reviews 15:33:55 #topic Open Reviews 15:33:59 #link https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/governance+is:open 15:34:14 we have 4 open review which are ready. 15:34:22 one is still in -W state 15:34:39 we have around 25 min, let's review those 15:35:52 there is no response form monasca team on this #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/771785 15:35:57 I will follow up with them 15:36:24 #action gmann to follow up with monasca team for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/771785 15:39:25 this one need one more vote to get required votes #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/774379 15:39:47 jungleboyj: dansmith knikolla can you please check ^^ 15:39:58 belmoreira: ^^ 15:40:42 rest all have enough required votes and mnaser can merge those once he is online. 15:41:01 * ricolin just add monasca ptl in review list for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/771785 15:41:12 ricolin: nice, thanks 15:41:20 Will do. 15:41:28 jungleboyj: thanks 15:42:02 anything else to discuss today otherwise we can close early. 15:43:52 Nothing from me. Sorry, been trying to convince an EVP in parallel. 15:44:02 Sounds good to me. 15:44:33 jungleboyj: best of luck :) 15:44:43 thanks everyone for joining . 15:44:48 #endmeeting