15:00:13 #startmeeting tc 15:00:14 Meeting started Thu Feb 25 15:00:13 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mnaser. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:15 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:00:16 #topic rollcall 15:00:17 The meeting name has been set to 'tc' 15:00:19 o/ 15:00:22 o/ 15:00:23 o/ 15:00:39 o/ 15:00:42 o/ 15:00:43 o/ 15:00:46 o/ 15:01:45 hello folks 15:01:59 hi evrardjp 15:02:03 o/ 15:02:11 evrardjp, hey! 15:02:33 #topic Follow up on past action items 15:02:41 diablo_rojo send out email to ML wrt k8s cross-community discussion 15:03:02 o/ 15:03:06 oh i guess i can ctrl+v again :p 15:03:08 diablo_rojo send out email to ML wrt k8s cross-community discussion 15:03:44 I did. 15:03:56 Yeah, I saw the note. :-) 15:03:59 yay, cool. i haven't been great at keeping our with the ML lately, so that's good 15:04:13 tc-members fill out https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/kubernetes-cross-community-topics with topics 15:04:46 ah, there's not much listed there 15:05:02 diablo_rojo: i noticed that the bit.ly link listed there asks me to request access 15:05:06 is that a not-public document? 15:05:50 I think you need to be in the google group :/ 15:05:56 k-dev 15:06:05 * mnaser shrugs 15:06:06 Its just their agenda and meeting details 15:06:18 how can someone join that group? 15:06:19 I can copy some of that over into the etherpad 15:06:24 or is it an invite thing 15:06:44 mnaser, its not an invite thing 15:06:53 uhhh let me find the link 15:07:28 keep in mind that "copying" information, even if public, may not be legal if they don't state a copyright license for it 15:07:38 I think that is usual k8s meeting things, join respective google group first to know agenda or so 15:07:59 fungi, good point. I would definitely talk to them before I did that. 15:08:14 gmann, exactly 15:08:33 ok it would be nice to have some info on how to access it, cause i dont really have access on their agenda / what the discussion is around / or how to join 15:08:44 https://groups.google.com/a/kubernetes.io/g/steering 15:08:48 Maybe there? 15:09:18 Their agenda is currently empty 15:09:30 But yeah, how to join will be important 15:10:23 joined the group but still won't let me see it :X 15:10:44 * mnaser wants to consider adding "google-based ecosystem being a problem for openness" to the topics 15:10:44 lol 15:10:50 hah 15:11:05 I will bring popcorn then 15:11:12 if you manage to join that is 15:11:20 :) 15:11:42 :) 15:12:17 ok well 15:12:34 it would be really good to add more topics in there and diablo_rojo maybe you can help us out in how to see it / get join info 15:13:26 diablo_rojo, just add two topic suggestion in etherpad 15:13:41 Thanks ricolin1 15:13:43 ! 15:13:52 yeah i added a few too 15:14:18 wondering if share resource or ask for official bless is something we cak discuss 15:14:58 i have unlocked the secret!! 15:15:03 https://groups.google.com/g/kubernetes-dev 15:15:07 need to join that 15:15:11 There it is. 15:15:16 I was trying to find that. 15:15:26 ok cool 15:15:28 added to etherpad 15:15:52 mnaser drop k8s steering commitee meeting from agenda < done 15:16:44 gmann to follow up with monasca team for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/771785 15:16:50 i think that is prettty much done / well progressed too 15:16:54 yeah 15:16:58 this is ready now #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/771785 15:17:06 perfect 15:17:10 all depends-on patches merged 15:17:21 mnaser drop Mistral Maintenance topic < done 15:17:32 #topic Audit SIG list and chairs (diablo_rojo) 15:17:56 I sent a bunch of emails this week- some directly to chairs listed, some the ML. 15:18:07 generally making progress towards finishing this up by next week I think 15:18:51 yes i also saw some feedback too from feilong 15:18:57 #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-February/020663.html 15:19:04 so it's moving along well, thanks diablo_rojo :> 15:19:20 #topic Gate performance and heavy job configs (dansmith) 15:20:21 yo 15:20:23 so, 15:20:38 nova has dropped an extra grenade job, which is a pretty heavy thing, which is cool 15:20:51 tripleo seems to have dropped their duplicate upgrade jobs, which were pretty big 15:20:57 I haven't circled back with neutron 15:21:09 but the crunch before m3 has started, so it's really hard to "feel" much difference 15:21:25 yeah, we need to do grenade thing for other project also like neutron 15:21:29 this last week has been crazy, so I haven't tried re-running my weigher to measure how heavy the jobs are after some of those drops 15:21:46 we're also seeing a *lot* of cinder fails across all the projects 15:22:02 the biggest thing we could do to improve for the crunch would be to fix some of those 15:22:14 I made a couple notes and popped into the cinder channel looking for help last week, but got no response 15:22:34 but if anyone here has cycles and cinder cred... :P 15:23:04 * jungleboyj looks around and whistles 15:23:29 Might be best to bring it as a topic to our weekly meeting next week. 15:23:32 oh, hey yeah like jungleboyj :P 15:23:45 * jungleboyj is in a covid haze 15:24:06 well, I'm beyond overcommitted these days, so I feel like I probably can't do too much knocking of heads over there, but.. 15:24:26 would there anyone who would be able to help out dansmith by reaching out at the cinder meeting 15:24:26 Eric Harney and Sophia are good at helping with stuff like that if we point them at what needs to be done. 15:24:50 mnaser: Sure, I could do that if you guys can get me some notes on what to look at. 15:24:51 jungleboyj: ack, well, I'm sure they're rechecking as much as the rest of us, and hopefully they're looking at the failures when they do 15:25:13 jungleboyj: https://termbin.com/4guht 15:25:25 these are stale now, but those were the biggest recurring fails I saw a couple weeks ago 15:25:54 dansmith: Ok. Let me take that up to the team in the meeting next week. 15:25:59 thanks 15:26:10 It is a good topic to just talk about whether we are watching failures anyway. 15:26:19 yeah 15:28:21 ok great, thanks dansmith and jungleboyj 15:28:30 mnaser: Welcome. 15:28:30 nd bug happening more frequently . 15:28:41 not sure if we have -r query for that 15:28:45 e-r 15:28:57 *2nd bug 15:29:33 #topic Student Programs (diablo_rojo) 15:29:53 i think the gsoc deadline has passed, so only outreachy is currently open 15:30:03 correct 15:30:09 is there anything we can do about this at this point or should we drop it from our agenda 15:30:10 That's all I had to mention lol 15:30:15 We can drop it 15:30:31 cool 15:30:43 #action mnaser drop student programs topic from agenda 15:30:55 #topic Recommended path forward for OSarchiver (ttx) 15:31:53 hi! 15:32:25 So we had a large scale SIG meeting yesterday but it was a video / discussion on regions vs. cells meeting rather than a SIG meeting 15:32:40 So we did not discuss something as mundane as OSarchiver 15:32:53 I'll bring it up at our next (IRC) meeting in two weeks though 15:33:01 so, please push back 15:33:20 ttx: shall we drop it until you add it in there again? :) 15:33:40 I'd be fine with that 15:34:06 ok cool 15:34:12 #action mnaser drop osarchiver topic for now 15:34:19 #topic open reviews 15:34:32 so zuul failed on a change but that gave time for more comments 15:34:48 the cool-down language was not super well received by a few people 15:34:52 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/770616 15:35:04 could we discuss how we feel like we can revise this and land it? 15:36:23 I think revising it with re-wording is much better way to avoid any confusion/misreading/misinterpretation 15:36:57 +1 15:36:59 it's a fair point that melwitt raises 15:37:01 * ricolin not that good at re-wording so just stand and watch 15:37:03 what would be the changes y'all suggest 15:37:47 I think s/cool-down/stabilization should be enough ? 15:38:25 I really think we should go for "no goals this time" 15:38:31 and not pick any adjectives :) 15:39:11 https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/index.html 15:39:17 yeah much better as we are just telling about community goal only not project's priority for other features or so 15:39:40 should we just add "No community goals for the Xena cycle" ? 15:39:48 +1 15:39:55 yes please :) 15:41:05 * mnaser searches for that code 15:41:18 I am not real picky. I was good with how it was, but whatever everyone feels best about. 15:41:53 and we can directly do this in 'selected' goal instead of going from 'proposed' and then 'selected' 15:43:02 does anyone have any idea on how we can repush this now? 15:43:48 there seems to be no conesus on using 'stabilization' or 'no goals' 15:44:40 we can just have draft vote here and then do the changes? or you want to remove the gerrit vote 15:44:41 push "no goals" and see if everyone is okay with it? 15:44:45 I thought it was just no goals. 15:44:52 ++ 15:45:43 if we go for "no goals" we need definitely to remove the "Goals for this cycle" 15:47:34 dansmith: so when you say no goals, we pushed a proposed goal of no goals? i dont think i can easily just add a "no goals for this cycle" because of how things are done 15:47:34 cause its a whole automatically generated toc 15:47:34 yeah, I dunno about the mechanics, so if we need a goal of no goals, then whatever I guess 15:47:34 https://opendev.org/openstack/governance/src/branch/master/goals/selected/index.rst 15:47:34 let's not end up in informationweek because our TOC generation required something 15:47:34 yeah, may be just keeping until L16 15:47:49 alternatively 15:47:51 we could also just not have Xena in the list right? 15:48:19 we can edit the language here https://opendev.org/openstack/governance/src/branch/master/goals/index.rst#community-goals to say that some cycles don't always have goals for $reasons 15:48:23 and then leave xena empty? 15:48:31 sure, that sounds good 15:48:37 That works for me. 15:48:52 Who knew not having a goal would be so hard. 15:49:39 jungleboyj :) 15:49:48 we're just so hard working 15:50:29 Ha ha. 15:50:29 i am quite deep into a lot of things these days. could someone push up a revision of my patch that drops the proposed goal and updates the language in goals/index.rst ? 15:51:15 and here also we can change- https://opendev.org/openstack/governance/src/branch/master/goals/index.rst#selecting-goals-for-a-cycle 15:51:29 s/It can be one or more depends/It can be zero or more depends 15:52:05 I am away today after meeting , but tomorrow I can push if no one else do it today 15:53:54 yeah ive got a really busy schedule today and this has stalled out a bit longer -- anyone free to make that small change? 15:55:17 I (and the rest of redhat) is off tomorrow and I'm scrambling myself too 15:55:43 belmoreira or jungleboyj do you think you might be able to help out with ^ 15:55:48 since the current state is the same (xena not in the list) I think there's no major rush 15:56:42 yeah, we can do tomorrow also. 15:57:25 I can try to do it today 15:57:42 belmoreira: awesome, thank you, feel free to ping tc-members after to look at it. i appreciate it 15:57:51 belmoreira: ++ I will help with review then. 15:58:20 Sorry, I am technically on sick leave the rest of the week. 15:58:36 cool, any thing for the last few minutes? :) 15:59:27 Nope 15:59:41 Nothing from me. 15:59:52 Nothing from me either:) 16:00:16 cool thanks everyone! 16:00:18 thanks mnaser 16:00:19 #endmeeting