15:00:16 #startmeeting tc 15:00:16 Meeting started Thu Jun 17 15:00:16 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is gmann. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:16 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:00:16 The meeting name has been set to 'tc' 15:00:22 #topic Roll call 15:00:23 o/ 15:00:23 o/ 15:00:25 o/ 15:00:30 o/ 15:00:31 o/ 15:01:04 o/ 15:01:59 let's start 15:02:00 #topic Follow up on past action items 15:02:16 gmann reachout to sahara team and PTL to get control of the #openstack-sahara channel 15:02:39 there is no response , I will check again 15:02:43 that's been solved 15:02:47 ok 15:02:51 did you get contyrol 15:03:09 o/ 15:03:12 sergey got back to folks, and got access turned over, and i've reverted the temporary bot removal patch for that channel, so yeah all set now 15:03:40 fungi: great. thanks 15:03:53 at this point there are no remaining channel access tasks 15:04:04 nice, thanks again 15:04:05 we're completely caught up 15:04:08 * mnaser wallks in late 15:04:16 o/ 15:04:19 fungi: Nice! 15:04:32 ricolin to send email on asking projects to enable and test tls-proxy in their jobs 15:05:11 also send patches already to projects 15:05:11 ricolin: you did I think 15:05:18 i know he sent it, i read it ;) 15:05:24 to enable tls-proxy 15:05:28 :) 15:05:33 #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-June/023000.html 15:05:38 #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%2522exame-tls-proxy%2522+(status:open+OR+status:merged) 15:07:09 mnaser, yoctozepto, and jungleboyj to work on cinder bug with cinder team. 15:07:23 any update on the cinder bug 15:07:24 i had some discussions .. yesterday or before yesterday? this week is all a blur :) 15:07:32 gmann: I followed up with Cinder and thanks to mnaser for debug help. 15:07:38 we've identified one failure caused by a segfault that has an open patch 15:07:40 not sure if that merged or not 15:07:51 I need to double check. 15:07:54 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/772126 15:08:15 mnaser: Ah good. Will work to get that merged today. 15:08:24 nice 15:08:27 so this is ONE failure case where lvdisplay was segfaulting ... so, once that merges, if we see more further failures, id be happy to debug them 15:08:37 We also had barbican issues causing failures which are now fixed. 15:08:39 i dont know if this is going to close all of the issues, but, it's one class of them 15:08:58 thanks to dansmith for sharing a failure with me, 15:09:00 I think that there will be more sefaults that we need to handle. 15:09:21 please feel free to share cinder fails with me and im happy to debug, turns out being an operator for a hot minute means you can comb through these failures quickly (: 15:09:24 We have gotten agreement from the Cinder team to not blindly recheck but to start keeping track of failures. 15:09:44 mnaser: Yeah, I was impressed with the response time. :-) 15:09:44 that is good direction 15:09:46 jungleboyj please cc me on any failures and ill gladly dig into them 15:09:56 mnaser: Awesome. Thank you! 15:10:07 our ci resources thank them for not just blindly rechecking changes without looking into failures too ;) 15:10:09 So, I think we made good progress there this week. 15:10:14 gmann: in summary, we're moving in a positive direction 15:10:23 excellent news 15:10:30 great, thanks a lot mnaser jungleboyj dansmith for getting things done 15:10:42 and Cinder team. 15:10:45 Great work! 15:11:07 :-) 15:11:13 let's move to next topic 15:11:15 #link Gate health check (dansmith/yoctozepto) 15:11:19 this is same topic 15:11:23 any other news 15:11:28 nothing other than the above from me 15:12:22 ok 15:12:34 That is progress too. :-) 15:12:48 #topic Gate health check (dansmith/yoctozepto) 15:12:55 sorry i missed the topic thing 15:12:59 look gmann , I said no more! :P 15:13:11 oh, hehe 15:13:18 ok 15:13:30 #topic Migration from 'Freenode' to 'OFTC' (gmann) 15:13:30 ヽ(ຈل͜ຈ)ノ︵ ┻━┻ 15:13:40 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/openstack-irc-migration-to-oftc 15:13:52 freenode helped us in doing that so thats nice 15:13:54 is anyone still there? 15:14:08 I sent reminder to projects to finish the wiki/doc updates 15:14:09 I dropped all my openstack joins 15:14:14 me too 15:14:20 I got k-lined 15:14:37 Gave up at that point. 15:14:43 I'm still thterer I thihnk 15:15:08 I did small write up also in openatack blog #link https://www.openstack.org/blog/the-openstack-community-irc-network-moved-to-oftc/ 15:15:28 and OpenStack/Openinfra site required update on two page are also informed 15:16:00 also I asked Alison price about twitter etc from openstack account 15:16:17 and remaining thigns we need is to finish the project side wiki/doc 15:16:28 I will keep this until we finish those too 15:16:45 anything else on this topic ? 15:17:33 #topic Recommendation on moving the meeting channel to project channel 15:17:39 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-team-guide/+/794839 15:17:46 this is merged now so we are good on this 15:17:55 I will remove this from next meeting agenda 15:18:07 #topic Governance nono-active repos retirement & cleanup 15:18:22 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/governance-repos-cleanup 15:18:37 I started this ^^ etherpad to cleanup the non-active repos under governance 15:19:09 I added some data also like last relevant commit 15:19:21 any objection on any of the repo to start the retirement ? 15:19:50 I'm good 15:20:14 ++ 15:20:30 openstack/scientific-wg one is to talk to Scientific SIG first and then take decision, I will reach out to them 15:21:02 ok, I will start cleaning those 15:21:32 before I move to Open Review 15:21:42 I haven't seen any Scientific SiH meeting reminderrs in a while but think they're still about 15:22:00 yeah, I will email to chair 15:22:01 they are still going 15:22:32 Y release naming: we have one TC member yet to vote on Y release name 15:22:38 today is last day to vote 15:22:54 the scientific-wg repo does not look relevant too much anyway 15:22:59 they might be good to retire it as well 15:23:03 but yeah, needs asking 15:23:13 yoctozepto: yeah in case you want to continue or so 15:23:21 gmann: and you won't tell us who that late member is? 15:23:27 I hope you remembered to vote :-) 15:23:32 I do not know until I end the vote 15:23:49 CIVS just show the number of voter vs authorized voters 15:23:51 oh, tricky 15:23:59 I voted this morning. Have you checked in the last hour or so? 15:24:12 Vote vote!!!! 15:24:17 yes, just now i refreshed 15:24:22 * yoctozepto remembers morning was 9 hours ago 15:24:31 :-) 15:24:37 My morning. 15:24:44 * jungleboyj is still in morning. 15:24:47 obviously 15:24:54 it is either timezone or a good party :-) 15:25:02 (or both) 15:25:04 Bwah hah ha 15:25:14 I liked what jungleboyj did with the poll 15:25:48 Thanks. I didn't expect the response I got and unfortunately found out that Survey Monkey holds your info hostage after 40 respondents. 15:25:49 yeah, I still like to have community to vote instead of just TC but jungleboyj way is good to get vote from community 15:26:01 it shows that people are willing to participate 15:26:10 yes 15:26:29 gmann: Yeah, wanted to get the community input too and let everyone feel like they could help. Honestly, I couldn't choose and needed help. 15:26:33 Do we maybe want to open voting back up? 15:26:47 jungleboyj: what won from the community? 15:26:47 I am in favor of that 15:26:51 yoda:) 15:27:02 spotz: I would say yes, but it got so contentious. 15:27:12 * spotz rerad the tweet:) 15:27:24 ok, Iw ill add topic in next meeting for voting rights to communtiy again 15:27:32 https://twitter.com/jungleboyj/status/1405503937470513154 15:27:48 Sweet, I like the idea I wasn't sure why it changed 15:27:48 So, likely it will be Yak? 15:28:00 I think this is one of the things that all the community should be involved. I don't remember why it changed 15:28:13 the problem with opening voting up "to the community" is you'll need to settle on a mechanism for doing that (deciding who gets to vote, how to let people know to vote, et cetera) whereas holding a poll for a known set of contacts is relatively trivial 15:28:27 I honestly don't know if yoda will pass legal but think of the poossibilities. We can have Baby Yoda as rc1:) 15:28:44 lol 15:28:50 fungi true 15:29:10 we can find some mechanish on that, let's discuss next 15:29:11 spotz: Yeah, depending on what the final vote is we are likely to have Legalissues. 15:29:12 next week 15:29:13 for this release, can everyone check if they have voted or not. 15:29:23 I did 15:29:29 I did. 15:29:36 but also, in the end, it's the tc and foundation legal who have to agree on a choice, so it gets contentious when the community favorite winds up getting overridden by tc dictate 15:29:47 i just did 15:30:00 oh, so we have all votes cast 15:30:02 (but honestly didn't pick a name because i still don't think i get to name releases) 15:30:06 fungi: yeah, we need to change that thingsso that we can avoid ussuri likle situation 15:30:10 SHOW US THE RESULTS 15:30:15 :D 15:30:16 fungi: Ah, that is right. I knew the community was upset by something in the process. It was the fact we had to override. 15:30:20 mnaser: ditto, same here 15:30:41 dansmith: diablo_rojo ? 15:30:43 so everything is ranked 18 for me 15:30:54 OMG, so we don't even have everyone voting. 15:31:12 ricolin: ? 15:31:13 I voted. 15:31:16 I guess we do need to change the process given that I went to a community vote. 15:31:30 gmann: what are you asking me? I voted. 15:31:41 jungleboyj: yeah, I am in favor of that since starting 15:31:43 dansmith: ok 15:32:11 I think ricolin left then ? 15:32:12 also voted 15:32:22 I will check with him 15:32:30 sorry catching up, double meeting_ 15:32:39 ricolin: vote for Y name :-) 15:32:45 oh! 15:32:46 voted! 15:32:48 :) 15:32:54 oh 15:32:59 great, its vote now 15:32:59 then gmann needs to refresh 15:33:05 let me end and see result 15:33:11 * yoctozepto can't wait 15:33:19 https://civs1.civs.us/cgi-bin/results.pl?id=E_f065453ffd2537cb 15:33:25 * jungleboyj does a drumroll, Christmas Vacation Style. 15:33:40 oh noez 15:33:52 I also voted 18 for all with same reason mnaser mentioned 15:33:53 ugh, so it's going to be york? 15:34:03 well 15:34:08 we need legal vetting first 15:34:15 so id wait before we go screaming to the twittarz :) 15:34:17 right I assume yoda and yeti will be ruled out 15:34:19 Assuming that Yoda and Yeti lose upon legal vetting. 15:34:30 as next step i will check the legal things with foundation 15:34:33 so it's Yak then 15:34:40 And it is a tie between York and Yak. 15:34:56 Yak was rated higher in my community vote so I would support that. 15:35:00 Yeah definitely let legal go first. 15:35:07 :-) 15:35:12 will see 15:35:19 I had already voted before jungleboyj started his poll or I would have done 18 for all of them too. 15:35:21 Yeti should pass legal 15:35:24 I still give my high hope on Yoda:) 15:35:27 yeah, this is one part of process and we will get the final name after legal checks 15:35:37 As it was I did 18 for 15 of them and 1 for three pronounceable names. 15:35:37 Oh, I am sorry, York isn't tied with Yak 15:35:57 * jungleboyj is glad that 'you' didn't win. 15:36:15 ^ that ^ 15:36:17 :D 15:36:23 one more thing which is not in agend but good to discuss "election official onboarding meeting by diablo_rojo " 15:36:24 spotz: Yeti ... The coolers. 15:36:25 i suppose if it winds up being york, we know where to have the next ptg 15:36:25 You should have been disqualified, 15:36:26 `you cycle` sounds strange :) 15:36:33 yeah, it's not a noun 15:36:36 it's a pronoun 15:36:38 diablo_rojo: go ahead 15:36:43 because it would be impossible to distinguish between people saying U release and You release 15:37:12 OpenStack is all of us. 15:37:27 it's the y'all release down here 15:37:39 LOL 15:37:42 jungleboyj: Yeah but Rocky the movie, I think therer's enough other uses of the word 15:37:49 dansmith: we should call it "Why" as in "Why did you call it <>?" 15:37:54 Oh yeah well I setup a meeting 15:37:56 * dansmith scowls 15:38:03 for the... 15:38:06 spotz: Well, we will see what happens with Legal. 15:38:09 ohk moving to "election official onboarding meeting by diablo_rojo " 15:38:09 10:36 AM Jay Bryant 15:38:11 29th 15:38:22 jungleboyj: sorry, it was copy paste :) 15:38:28 Yes. 15:38:37 jungleboyj: I'm just saying it's a possible. Yoda I don't think will pass:( 15:38:38 #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-June/023060.html 15:38:39 So, for those interested in being election officials. 15:38:43 Please join! 15:38:58 who all volutneer to help for next election ? 15:39:12 Cool. 15:39:26 I will have to teach people and then hang around in an advisory capacity becuase I think I am up for reelection. 15:39:28 diablo_rojo: I think you would not be able to be election official if you are running for TC. 15:39:35 ok 15:39:37 gmann, yep, that is correct. 15:39:43 I said I'd help 15:39:51 we need two member at least right? or one is enough 15:39:52 or for ptl 15:39:57 spotz, does that meeting work for you? 15:40:05 we can run a combined election again 15:40:11 more generally, if you're running for an office you can't officiate the election you're also running for, as it would be a conflict of interest 15:40:13 I offered to help if you guys need me. 15:40:19 +1 for combined election 15:40:23 What fungi said :) 15:40:35 jungleboyj, aren't you going to be up for reelection with me? 15:40:44 s/can't/shouldn't/ really 15:41:31 diablo_rojo: Yes, but I am not planning on running again at this point in time. 15:41:35 diablo_rojo: yeah it looks doable. I'll get it on my work calendarr. Won't say I won't be on the pony:) 15:41:39 I will add this to next meeting agenda also to have next election official or we get someone from community 15:41:43 jungleboyj, oh cool then yes please help 15:41:48 :-) 15:41:50 gmann, sounds good 15:42:11 jungleboyj, spotz I attached the ical to the email so you should be able to block your calendars with it 15:42:11 #action gmann to add election official assignments in next week meeting agenda 15:42:40 Yep. It is on my calendar. I will attend the meeting. If there are enough people interested in helping I will leave my options open. 15:42:47 * jungleboyj is all about going with the flow lately. 15:43:13 hehe 15:43:17 jungleboyj: spotz thanks 15:43:32 #topic Open Reviews 15:43:35 #link https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:openstack/governance+is:open' 15:43:56 You are all welcome to join to learn about the process even if you don't help this time 15:44:04 panko retirement has enough vote but I added OpenStack Puppet PTL to ack this. 15:44:12 diablo_rojo: ++ 15:44:12 Learning this time doesn't mean you HAVE to do it for the next election 15:44:40 diablo_rojo: My thought exectly. 15:45:00 gmann: I'd say puppet has nothing to deploy if panko is retired 15:45:47 yoctozepto: yes, but as pocess we need PTL +1 for repo retirement from their project 15:46:24 gmann: should mrunge repropose to retire only telemetry's part then and don't worry about puppet-panko? 15:47:23 yoctozepto: puppet-panko content is also removed so we can do it together or in separate patch which agfain need PTL +1 15:47:32 so I am fine with waiting on this patch itself 15:47:37 ack 15:48:21 I added them in Reviewer but they have not yet voted. I will ping on IRC also if available 15:48:37 that's all form me for today meeitng 15:48:38 anything else to discuss? 15:48:47 not from me 15:49:01 Nothing from me. 15:49:19 diablo_rojo, can you update according https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance-sigs/+/778304/4/sigs.yaml#b163 15:49:21 Nada 15:49:33 for the K8s SIG irc 15:50:23 Sure. 15:50:26 nothing else from me 15:50:33 diablo_rojo, thanks:) 15:50:41 ok, let's close then 15:50:41 thanks all for joining. 15:50:45 #endmeeting