15:00:11 #startmeeting tc 15:00:11 Meeting started Thu Sep 8 15:00:11 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is slaweq. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:11 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:00:11 The meeting name has been set to 'tc' 15:00:18 #topic Roll call 15:00:19 o/ 15:00:23 o/ 15:00:30 o/ 15:00:33 \o 15:00:41 o/ 15:00:51 o/ 15:01:28 gmann: and arne_wiebalck will not attend today's meeting 15:02:01 so I guess we are waiting for spotz and diablo_rojo 15:03:26 ok, I think we can start as we have quorum alread 15:03:42 spotz: and diablo_rojo will maybe join later 15:03:58 today's agenda #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee 15:04:05 #topic Follow up on past action items 15:04:23 o/ 15:04:28 here 15:04:31 there are 4 items on the list from last week but all assigned to gmann 15:04:42 welcome noonedeadpunk and spotz :) 15:05:07 \o/ 15:05:16 so I guess we can skip that section as gmann is not here and move on to the next topic today 15:05:30 I will just add all of those for gmann for next week, to not forget 15:05:42 #action gmann to add community-wide goal productivity and how to make work fast in PTG etherpas 15:05:50 #action gmann to add and invite SIG I18 chair/members to TC+ Leader interaction session 15:06:03 #action gmann to check with PTG organizer about 17-19 UTC slot booking 15:06:06 #action gmann to book operator hours slot and ask PTL to choose them 15:06:17 I think nova has done that now right? 15:06:18 #topic Gate health check 15:06:32 nova and cinder both have, yes 15:06:39 cool 15:07:08 Excellent. 15:07:18 slaweq: I don't have anything for gate health this week 15:07:27 thx 15:07:30 FF went pretty well in terms of gate perf I think 15:07:40 I know that with new oslo.db 12.1.0 neutron's functional tests are broken 15:07:54 but we have fix in review already 15:08:09 and also some UT jobs with that oslo.db version is failing intermittently 15:08:49 dansmith: yes, I didn't saw any big stress in the gate during the FF week 15:09:22 That is good news! 15:09:22 regarding rechecks stats, new data is on #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/recheck-weekly-summary 15:09:32 but it looks generally good 15:09:40 I don't see any major problems there really 15:10:17 anything else regarding gate for today or can we move on? 15:11:05 ok, lets move on 15:11:10 #topic Checks on Zed cycle tracker 15:11:18 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-zed-tracker 15:12:33 any updates about it? 15:12:53 i have a question about item #2 15:13:29 it looks like the openstack-specs guidelines have already been moved into a "real" repo 15:13:38 https://docs.openstack.org/oslo.log/latest/user/guidelines.html 15:13:54 that page is basically the old spec revised a bit 15:14:27 so my question is, should we have this thing live in oslo.log, or do we want to have something in the project guide? 15:15:24 I wouldn't think we would want to duplicate. 15:15:33 it seems to make sense in oslo.log as a place people will look 15:15:34 Maybe provide a link to it? 15:15:42 i think it makes sense in oslo.log 15:15:42 rosmaita: ++ 15:16:23 yeah, I agree that oslo.log is good place for that 15:16:24 +1 oslo.log is where I'd start looking, but linking is important as well 15:16:35 easier to find probably then openstack-specs 15:16:37 ok, then i will put up a patch to the spec saying where the real page is now, and also update the wiki with a link to oslo.log 15:16:52 right, in the specs repo you are never sure how accurate/up-to-date it is 15:16:59 ok, thanks 15:17:07 Yeah. That sounds like a good plan to me. 15:17:35 any other updates? 15:17:45 Unfortunately ... no. 15:18:41 ok, so I think that we can move on to the next topic 15:18:44 #topic 2023.1 cycle PTG Planning 15:18:51 TC + Leaders interaction sessions 15:18:57 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-leaders-interaction-2023-1 15:19:44 not many topics on the list so far 15:20:46 TC PTG etherpad 15:20:52 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-2023-1-ptg 15:21:02 also, here there are no many topics added so far 15:21:27 if You have any topics, please add them to the etherpads 15:22:06 about operator hours I think we should wait for gmann to be back 15:22:13 as he had to book time slots for it 15:22:47 anything You want to discuss regarding to the PTG planning today? 15:23:39 I guess that this means "no" :) 15:23:54 #topic 2023.1 cycle Technical Election 15:24:10 spotz: any updates on that topic? 15:24:28 We will have a few seats the TC needs to appoint as far as PTLs 15:25:23 As we are having voting we put in a patch to have campaigning until Monday for the TC nominations to have a chance to campaign, folks to be able to opt-in to CIVS and for us to get everything setup 15:26:05 i didn't pay close attention, but have communications included reminders where/how interested voters can opt into receiving ballots? 15:26:19 it's been probably a year since we last needed to do that, and memories are short 15:26:44 That hasn't gone out yet fungi, when I sent the noms closed email I didn't know Ian had done anything on the CIVS side 15:27:12 pulling a list please hold 15:27:45 Ok so OpenStackSDK fors have a nomination but they submitted under Zed vs Antelope so we have that straitghened out 15:28:13 Barbican had a late merged nom but made the deadline on the nom 15:28:36 I think this step can be done independently of setting CIVS up, I can respond to the email spotz sent directing people to how to opt in to receiving mail from CIVS 15:28:36 Keystone and Zun will need to be appointed from TC but do have volunteers 15:28:58 well, the voter opt-ins have to be done before voter addresses are uploaded to civs, since that's the point at which it decides whether to send ballots to them 15:29:01 Swift said they were sending one but not received 15:29:12 Masakari has a volunteer 15:29:18 I think that's everyone 15:29:39 NO PTL elections needed 15:29:55 I thought there were two candidates for Ironic. 15:29:56 We have 6 folks running for TC's 4 seats so will have an election 15:30:03 even for Ironic? I think I saw in Your email that Ironic will have election 15:30:09 ooh let me look 15:30:12 :-) 15:31:10 I can recall also venus not having PTL that needs to appointed? 15:31:24 Oh ok Ironic will have an election! 15:31:43 noonedeadpunk: We need a volunteer before we can appoint:) 15:32:15 I thought I saw that. 15:32:30 Zun and Keystone didn't have patches in the time frame but did nominate, Masakari volunteered so we have people to appoint 15:34:01 sent email about opting in to CIVS. 15:34:10 Thanks knikolla 15:34:33 I pinged Ian in the elctions channel about Ironic:) 15:35:52 So that's where we are on the election. 15:37:12 thx spotz and knikolla for an updates 15:37:39 with that I think we can move to the last topic for today, which is 15:37:47 #topic Open Reviews 15:37:52 *drumroll* 15:37:55 #link https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:openstack/governance+is:open 15:38:00 jungleboyj: :D 15:38:48 please check patches on that list and review if You didn't yet :) 15:39:02 especially https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/854375 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/855276 15:39:26 and that's all for today :) 15:39:39 I can give You 20 minutes back 15:39:47 thx for attending the meeting and see You online 15:39:48 slaweq: Thanks for running things! 15:39:51 #endmeeting