16:00:03 <gmann> #startmeeting tc 16:00:03 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Wed Dec 21 16:00:03 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is gmann. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:00:03 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:00:03 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'tc' 16:00:08 <gmann> #topic Roll call 16:00:11 <gmann> o/ 16:00:14 <rosmaita> o/ 16:00:18 <slaweq> hi 16:00:18 <knikolla[m]> o/ 16:00:43 <gmann> today agenda #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee#Next_Meeting 16:00:51 <slaweq> gmann sorry but I have urgent private thing to do now and I will not be able to attend the meeting today 16:00:57 <noonedeadpunk> o/ 16:01:02 <gmann> slaweq: np!, ack 16:01:06 <slaweq> recheck stats are from today and all looks good there 16:01:14 <gmann> cool, thanks for updates 16:01:18 <slaweq> happy holidays to everyone and see You in 2023 16:01:20 <slaweq> o/ 16:01:26 <noonedeadpunk> \o/ 16:01:30 <gmann> you too, happy holidays 16:01:38 <gmann> let's start 16:01:47 <gmann> #topic Follow up on past action items 16:01:49 <spotz> o/ 16:02:12 <gmann> no action item from previous meeting 16:02:24 <gmann> #topic Gate health check 16:02:43 <gmann> I have not observed any frequent failure this week 16:03:15 <noonedeadpunk> We have CentOS 9 Stream repos broken 16:03:22 <noonedeadpunk> Or well, desynced 16:03:32 <gmann> ohk 16:04:30 <noonedeadpunk> I haven't digged too deep, but thing like `dnf -y install python3 python3-devel libselinux-python3` does fail currently 16:05:02 <noonedeadpunk> Example: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/1e44de404ed44ec39994a06e3b2bd183/log/job-output.txt#4884-4894 16:05:16 <noonedeadpunk> Maybe it's only OSA though, but quite unlikely 16:06:53 <gmann> in quick check, devstack platform job seems running fine #link https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-centos-9-stream&skip=0 16:07:34 <noonedeadpunk> During autumn I can recall switching centos mirrors to "less loaded" one according to maintainer, that should perform way better as has less stuff on it, but it might be not at the end 16:07:53 <gmann> tempest too #link https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=tempest-full-centos-9-stream&skip=0 16:08:07 <noonedeadpunk> We see that today only 16:08:15 <gmann> k 16:08:20 <noonedeadpunk> And first job that failed was launched like 1pm or smth 16:08:30 <gmann> i see 16:09:42 <gmann> I think tox4 is going to be unpinned in ensure-tox today and hope all projects are on top of it to fix the ghings 16:10:20 <noonedeadpunk> I hope centos thing will get self-healed, but will be checking on that 16:10:35 <gmann> ok, thanks 16:10:39 <gmann> anything else on gate things? 16:11:08 <gmann> #topic 2023.1 TC tracker checks 16:11:11 <gmann> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-2023.1-tracker 16:11:16 <rosmaita> sorry, wasn' 16:11:21 <rosmaita> t typing fast enough 16:11:23 <gmann> any update on the tracker items? 16:11:32 <rosmaita> what's the plan with tox 4 in stable branches? 16:12:15 <gmann> rosmaita: we need to fix them, it will be easy to backport the things than pinning it on stable branch 16:12:39 <rosmaita> tox 4 doesn't support py3.6, so what does that mean for yoga and older? 16:12:56 <gmann> I gave try to pin it and let project to unpin during backport but that seems more complex to do in zuul jobs #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-zuul-jobs/+/867849 16:12:57 <noonedeadpunk> gmann: btw in devstack it's endev up like that https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/1b37b0e31dd14aa398a71377ee27eb4b/log/job-output.txt#2264 16:13:21 <gmann> noonedeadpunk: ohk 16:13:39 <noonedeadpunk> well, not ended, but I guess you got what I meant :) 16:13:46 <gmann> yeah 16:14:20 <gmann> rosmaita: I have not checked that but JayF backported the Ironic fixes on stable. we can check how it behave there 16:14:37 <rosmaita> ok, because i am seeing this: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/rbd-iscsi-client/+/868324/ 16:14:49 <gmann> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/I84202ac10e9195647162f0b5737ebb610ef1ef93 16:15:35 <gmann> seems py36 job running fine in ironic backport #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic/+/867872 16:15:47 <rosmaita> but is it running tox 4? 16:16:13 <rosmaita> this is what i see when using tox 4: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/53acb83e71bf4b0a91b923a328c45ed4 16:17:03 <gmann> rosmaita: ah, no it is older tox as it is pinned #link https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/dfbf66b0df3741198743ec46ce5dd026/log/job-output.txt#607 16:17:14 <rosmaita> yeah, that's what i thought 16:17:27 <rosmaita> i think this is going to be a problem: https://github.com/tox-dev/tox/blob/main/pyproject.toml#L22 16:18:37 <gmann> rosmaita: so error is ubuntu bionic does not have tox4 right? 16:18:48 <rosmaita> well, tox will update itself 16:18:53 <gmann> let's discuss/debug it after meeting 16:18:57 <rosmaita> ok, sure 16:18:59 <gmann> thanks rosmaita for bringing it 16:19:16 <rosmaita> np, i think we should wait on the stable branches for after the holidays, imo 16:19:20 <gmann> any other updates on tracker? 16:19:35 <gmann> #topic Mistral situation 16:19:42 <gmann> Release team proposing it to mark its release deprecated 16:19:51 <gmann> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/866562 16:19:59 <gmann> New volunteers from OVHCloud are added in Mistral core team. 16:20:03 <gmann> that is good things. 16:20:41 <gmann> avanzagh, one of the new maintainers will reachout to release team to check what is pending for mistral release 16:20:57 <gmann> and based on that we can decide on tha governance patch 16:21:35 <gmann> and it seems he talked in release channel. 16:21:55 <gmann> all good here for now and we will monitor the situation until release team is good for its release 16:22:15 <rosmaita> that is good news 16:22:36 <gmann> yeah, getting new maintainers from users side is good things 16:23:02 <gmann> anything else on Mistral? 16:23:28 <gmann> #topic Recurring tasks check 16:23:29 <gmann> Bare 'recheck' state 16:23:38 <gmann> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/recheck-weekly-summary 16:24:13 <gmann> slaweq added this week data and mentioned at the start of meeting "recheck stats are from today and all looks good there" 16:24:32 <gmann> #topic Open Reviews 16:24:39 <gmann> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:openstack/governance+is:open 16:24:44 <gmann> let's check open review quickly 16:25:44 <spotz> I put in some wording changes on the release one 16:26:04 <gmann> spotz: thanks for review, I just saw those. 16:26:26 <gmann> spotz: as most of those are in exiting docs not in the chnages, is it ok for you to fix them in follow up? 16:27:45 <spotz> looking as it was in the rewording block on my screen anyways 16:28:12 <gmann> yeah, adding few new lines end up re-arranging the lines/para 16:28:54 <spotz> Yeah if you want it to go through I'll put in a follow up patch but as it only has one vote we could fix it in 5 seconds 16:29:14 <rosmaita> it actually has 4 votes 16:29:23 <rosmaita> (i don't like the new gerrit interface) 16:29:26 <gmann> yeah it is ready to merge with 4 votes 16:29:31 <gmann> rosmaita: yeah, same here 16:29:46 <spotz> rosmaita: Yeah me neiher I can't tell anything in regards to votes, I looked down at comments 16:30:07 <spotz> Ok merge it and when I get home later I'll put i the patch 16:30:27 <gmann> spotz: I will put patch before I merge this. 16:30:29 <gmann> thanks 16:30:40 <gmann> I think that is all on open reviews 16:30:47 <gmann> and also from today agenda 16:31:03 <gmann> one update, as discussed in one of the past meeting, we will cancel next week meeting 16:31:12 <gmann> no meeting on Dec 28 16:31:21 <gmann> I will send it on ML 16:31:31 <gmann> we will meet on Jan 4 on video call 16:31:49 <gmann> we have ~30 min left, if anyone would like to discuss anything? 16:32:07 <spotz> As I fail at PTO I'm good at ending here:) 16:32:54 <gmann> ok, if nothing else. let's close. 16:33:14 <gmann> thanks everyone for joining. have a nice holidays 16:33:19 <gmann> #endmeeting