22:00:25 <sgordon> #startmeeting telcowg 22:00:26 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Jan 21 22:00:25 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is sgordon. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 22:00:27 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 22:00:30 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'telcowg' 22:00:34 <sgordon> hopefully this week i am in the right meeting room ;) 22:00:42 <sgordon> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nfv-meeting-agenda 22:00:47 <sgordon> #topic roll call 22:01:03 <cloudon> hi 22:01:04 <aveiga> hello 22:01:07 <gmatefi> hi 22:01:10 <sgordon> who is up and about for the telco working group 22:01:22 <sgordon> hi all 22:02:08 <sgordon> #topic action items from last week 22:02:29 <sgordon> amitry took an action on monitoring ops mid cycle signups 22:02:35 <sgordon> but afaik there is no registration page yet 22:02:45 <sgordon> so still nothing to do there, will carry it over 22:03:00 <sgordon> #action amitry to cross reference ops mid-cycle signups with telco wg participants to determine crossover 22:03:11 <sgordon> mkoderer, are you around? 22:04:04 <sgordon> i ask in the context of you volunteering yourself to write a multi-site use case 22:04:11 <sgordon> #action mkoderer to take a stab at documenting use for multi-site 22:04:14 <sgordon> ok 22:04:17 <sgordon> #topic use cases 22:04:27 <sgordon> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TelcoWorkingGroup/UseCases 22:04:39 <sgordon> so last week we endeavored to dive into the vIMS use case 22:04:57 <sgordon> on top of getting a bit off track at times it proved pretty difficult to collate feedback effectively live 22:05:29 <sgordon> so during the week i created etherpads with the idea that we might try and record feedback inline during the week, and then discuss 22:05:35 <ijw> o/ 22:06:02 <sgordon> another suggestion was to go to gerrit for reviewing the use cases but i am really hesitant to do this due to the potential impact on non-developer input 22:06:20 <aveiga> sgordon: also, there's no specific repo for that 22:06:28 <sgordon> right, we would need a repo 22:06:31 <sgordon> (fun) 22:08:18 <sgordon> so i guess my thinking is, do we want to pick a use case and 'try again' 22:08:20 <sgordon> during the week 22:08:32 <sgordon> we could do vIMS again or attempt a different one 22:08:50 <sgordon> the idea being to use the etherpad to record the feedback instead of having it all unfold in the meeting :) 22:10:36 <ijw> o/ 22:10:36 <sgordon> silence is violence 22:10:49 <sgordon> im going to suggest we take two and will take an action to email the list 22:11:09 <cloudon> am happy to give it a try this week with vIMS again 22:11:22 <sgordon> my suggestion is we try a do over on vIMS and pick up VPN instantiation as well to try 22:11:47 <cloudon> sounds good to me 22:12:29 <sgordon> ok 22:12:53 <sgordon> #action sgordon to email list suggesting review of vIMS and VPN instantiation use cases via etherpad 22:13:05 <sgordon> so the fun stuff 22:13:17 <sgordon> #topic Design and Implementation 22:13:55 <sgordon> so first things first, is anyone in attendance currently seeking a feature freeze exception 22:14:23 <sgordon> the work we had been regularly tracking had to the best of my knowledge already been approved, but looking for any outliers 22:15:10 <sgordon> ijw, do you have any updates from your side on current spec implementation work 22:15:36 <sgordon> there was one query on the list just before the meeting about virtio multi-queue 22:15:54 <sgordon> that spec is not approved but an FFE has been requested i need to check how likely that is to get picked up tho 22:16:01 <ijw> Got someone assigned to it recently, and I've not checked his progress so I can't give you a % complete or anything. I also had a willing volunteer mail me about the MTU work so it may be possible to break things up there 22:16:20 <ijw> Seems late for a FFE to be approved. 22:16:28 <sgordon> yeah im not holding my breath 22:16:37 <sgordon> i think the deadline for nova is tomorrow 22:16:50 <sgordon> so will be sorted out one way or another in the meeting i expect 22:17:14 <sgordon> (nova meeting that is) 22:17:50 <sgordon> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/input-output-based-numa-scheduling,n,z 22:18:22 <sgordon> there is still an outstanding patch associated with PCIe locality but looks like it fails verification atm 22:18:40 <sgordon> i dont have anything else to add on this topic atm 22:18:54 <sgordon> #topic other business 22:19:10 <sgordon> as i mentioned in the opening no registration for the ops mid cycle yet that i have seen 22:19:21 <sgordon> anyone have another topic they would like to raise this week? 22:21:54 <sgordon> well then 22:21:56 <sgordon> on that note 22:22:01 <sgordon> #endmeeting