18:01:18 <krtaylor> #startmeeting third-party
18:01:19 <openstack> Meeting started Mon Dec  8 18:01:18 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is krtaylor. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
18:01:20 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
18:01:22 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'third_party'
18:01:31 <mmedvede> o/
18:01:35 <sweston> o/
18:01:41 <krtaylor> any third-party CI operators around?
18:02:38 <asselin> o/
18:03:08 <krtaylor> well, I hope my connection holds out, seems network is more flaky than normal
18:03:38 <sweston> we'll wait for you ;-)
18:03:53 <krtaylor> hehheh, hopefully we have more lurking
18:04:02 <krtaylor> #topic Welcome & Reminder of OpenStack Mission
18:04:10 <krtaylor> #info The OpenStack Open Source Cloud Mission: to produce the ubiquitous Open Source Cloud Computing platform that will meet the needs of public and private clouds regardless of size, by being simple to implement and massively scalable.
18:04:24 <krtaylor> we have a pretty full agenda today
18:04:42 <krtaylor> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ThirdParty#12.2F8.2F14
18:05:01 <krtaylor> #topic Review of previous week's open action items
18:05:16 <krtaylor> so we had 2 from last week, both mine
18:05:40 <krtaylor> I completed the wiki and kickoff email for the 3rd party doc refresh
18:05:48 <krtaylor> hope all saw that email
18:05:58 <krtaylor> we'll get to that in a bit
18:06:29 <krtaylor> second was to ping PTLs for deadlines, and I have some updates there as well
18:06:53 <krtaylor> #topic Announcements
18:07:00 <krtaylor> any announcements?
18:07:37 <krtaylor> I'll take silence as no
18:07:39 <krtaylor> #topic OpenStack Program items
18:08:27 <krtaylor> so, the third-party CI documentation is underway
18:08:32 <krtaylor> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/third-party-ci-documentation
18:09:03 <krtaylor> if you want to help, comment on the email thread, read the current docs, think through changes
18:09:10 <krtaylor> and sign up on the etherpad
18:09:49 <krtaylor> we'll see the response, if we get several people wanting to help, we may try the virtual sprint that infra manual did
18:10:31 <krtaylor> that was to use the sprint irc channel for 2-3 days of working as a team to bang out all the updates
18:11:03 <krtaylor> but if not, we'll just use the etherpad to coordinate the patches and figure out what is being worked on
18:11:27 <krtaylor> any questions on that?
18:12:01 <krtaylor> else, onward, to third-party CI monitoring and the associated spec
18:12:05 <krtaylor> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/135170
18:12:39 <krtaylor> I see some comments, sweston were you going to rev that spec?
18:12:46 <krtaylor> or did you need more input?
18:12:57 <sweston> I am still responding to the latest comments, but there is only one noteworthy comment so far.  I need more input.
18:13:28 <krtaylor> ok, I was thinking of proposing a command line tool, that could be a subset of the vision to get started
18:13:37 <sweston> jhasketh would like some functionality included for the rest api, and that is fine.
18:14:18 <sweston> krtaylor: yes, that would be helpful.  the command line tool would be used to access the rest api
18:14:23 <krtaylor> did anyone else have any questions or comments on the spec for sweston ?
18:15:34 <krtaylor> sweston, the process used to test a system in question could use more detail, as well as how the data will be represented, early feedback from other projects was for a radar-like ui
18:15:54 <sweston> krtaylor: ok, noted
18:16:33 <sweston> krtaylor: thank you
18:16:51 <krtaylor> so, if nobody has any questions or comments, please review the spec
18:17:56 <krtaylor> and finally for this section, I hope everyone has heard about the third-party self serve system accounts
18:18:13 <krtaylor> go read all about it at:
18:18:18 <krtaylor> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/137240
18:18:30 <sweston> woot!!
18:18:41 <asselin> yes, very nice
18:18:43 <krtaylor> yes, fantastic work by infra team
18:18:50 <krtaylor> +1000
18:19:05 <krtaylor> I have not heard of anyone using it yet, any feedback?
18:19:54 <krtaylor> ok, onward then
18:19:59 <krtaylor> #topic Deadlines & Deprecations
18:20:29 <krtaylor> neutron mid-cycle is underway, we may get feedback for this topic following that
18:20:58 <krtaylor> cinder said "Current plan is that we are warning people with existing drivers that they need CI working K-2.  New drivers need it by the end of Kilo."
18:21:11 <krtaylor> as per jungleboyj
18:21:58 <krtaylor> I have not head of any changes or new deadlines coming for nova driver testing
18:22:35 <krtaylor> except that they are looking for better reporting on the health of CI systems (what our monitoring dashboard addresses)
18:22:43 <asselin> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/tested-3rdParty-drivers
18:22:50 <asselin> ^^ cinder 3rd party ref
18:23:03 <krtaylor> asselin, thanks!
18:23:43 <krtaylor> asselin, are you the cinder liaison?
18:24:03 <asselin> krtaylor, not officially, but I work on cinder-ci
18:24:19 <krtaylor> asselin, I would be it will be official soon  :)
18:24:26 <asselin> lol
18:24:26 <krtaylor> s/be/bet
18:24:51 <krtaylor> any questions or comments on deadlines?
18:25:15 <krtaylor> #topic Highlighting a Program or Third-Party CI Service
18:25:47 <krtaylor> just another quick mention on the split out of the puppet modules, see links in agenda
18:26:04 <krtaylor> that will be ongoing for a while I imagine
18:26:29 <sweston> the split script has been running successfully for a week now, so yay for that
18:26:30 <asselin> sweston, how's your script doing with that?
18:26:46 <asselin> ok, great. I was going to start another one and ref your repo
18:27:03 <sweston> it has also been proposed to the repository, one sec, i'll have the link
18:27:30 <sweston> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/137991/
18:27:52 <sweston> asselin: waiting for your respected review ;-)
18:28:10 <sweston> (and anybody else who would like to test it)
18:28:24 <asselin> sweston, can you change the topic to module-split
18:28:31 <asselin> sweston, will be easier to find :)
18:29:01 <sweston> asselin: yeah, I must have reset it to master when doing the check-in
18:29:10 <sweston> will do
18:29:13 <asselin> thanks
18:29:41 <krtaylor> excellent, so that brings us to your items asselin
18:29:43 <krtaylor> In-tree Third Party CI Solution
18:29:55 <asselin> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:thirdpartyci,n,z
18:30:29 <asselin> I wrote a spec to get an in-tree ci solution based on what infra is using (jenkins/zuul/nodepool)
18:30:57 <asselin> I also took a baby-step to get the log server directly reusable by 3rd party ci operators
18:31:04 <krtaylor> looks good
18:31:12 <krtaylor> yes, lots of comments there  :)
18:31:12 <asselin> Lots of good comments, and I'd like to get some more
18:31:21 <sweston> asselin: this is interesting, thanks, will definitely review
18:31:28 <asselin> and see if anyone has ideas/solutions to address the comments
18:31:39 <sweston> we've needed this for a long time :-)
18:31:49 <krtaylor> agreed
18:32:08 <sweston> asselin: +1000
18:32:47 <asselin> my 'internal' stretch goal is to get something working/proposed by K1.
18:33:00 <asselin> (before k2 starts)
18:33:06 <sweston> asselin: i'll work with you on this, would you add me as a primary assignee?
18:33:12 <asselin> or before christmas :)
18:33:19 <asselin> sure can, thanks!
18:33:39 <sweston> awesome, and thanks for the spec!
18:33:52 <krtaylor> great work
18:34:09 <asselin> if anyone else is interested, just ping me, or add a comment to the spec asking to be added :)
18:34:35 * krtaylor wishes he had more time to work on this
18:35:03 <asselin> krtaylor, reviews/ideas would be great
18:35:15 <krtaylor> asselin, will do
18:35:24 <asselin> thanks
18:35:38 <krtaylor> and I'll see if I can encourage others to review as well
18:36:05 <krtaylor> any other questions or comments from anyone for this topic?
18:36:50 <krtaylor> onward then
18:37:01 <krtaylor> #topic CI System issues
18:37:09 <krtaylor> anyone have anything here?
18:37:40 <krtaylor> I did see some great comments left for other systems that were wishing to have their account re-enabled
18:38:23 <krtaylor> exactly the value that this team can bring to the community, reviewing other systems and recommending their enabling or voting, ect
18:38:42 <krtaylor> any systems needing review?
18:39:16 <krtaylor> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ThirdPartySystems
18:39:33 <krtaylor> the systems page shows several that are still down
18:39:50 <krtaylor> 4 I believe
18:40:44 <krtaylor> I don't know how current this page is, it may need refreshing, I'll email those systems
18:41:30 <krtaylor> next then
18:41:45 <krtaylor> #topic Open Discussion
18:41:58 <krtaylor> I had one item, meeting time/date
18:42:15 <krtaylor> there is an email thread, currently with 2 proposals
18:42:34 <krtaylor> 1) for 2 meetings a week 2) for one meeting a week at alternating times
18:42:45 <krtaylor> please read that thread and comment
18:42:57 <krtaylor> I'd like to get that wrapped up this week
18:43:36 <krtaylor> so far, the alternating meeting proposal has the most votes, if that continues, I'll propose times to vote on shortly
18:43:48 <krtaylor> any comments?
18:44:07 <asselin> +1 for alternate meeting times
18:44:24 <sweston> ditto
18:44:28 <mmedvede> same
18:44:39 <krtaylor> thanks asselin, sweston, mmedvede
18:44:58 <krtaylor> ok, then I'll open the floor
18:45:13 <krtaylor> any topics to discuss, questions to answer?
18:48:31 <krtaylor> ok, well since the discussion has wound down quickly, I'll close it out
18:48:39 <krtaylor> thanks everyone, great meeting!
18:48:49 <asselin> thanks krtaylor
18:49:03 <sweston> thanks everyone!
18:49:07 <krtaylor> #endmeeting