15:00:11 <anteaya> #startmeeting third-party 15:00:11 <openstack> Meeting started Mon Feb 1 15:00:11 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is anteaya. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:12 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:00:15 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'third_party' 15:00:18 <anteaya> hello 15:00:27 <eantyshev> Hello! 15:00:33 <lennyb> hi 15:00:46 <anteaya> hello eantyshev and lennyb 15:00:50 <anteaya> how are you today? 15:01:26 <eantyshev> Last week I discovered that periodic pipelines don't work in current zuul 15:01:46 <anteaya> eantyshev: that is good to know 15:01:53 <anteaya> how did you discover that? 15:02:01 <mmedvede> hi 15:02:07 <anteaya> hey mmedvede 15:02:17 <eantyshev> got a quick fix for that: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/272123/ 15:02:19 <anteaya> mmedvede: thank you for chairing last week's meeting 15:02:25 <anteaya> mmedvede: how did it go? 15:02:47 <eantyshev> anteaya: just tried to establish a periodic job in our CI 15:02:47 <mmedvede> anteaya: you are welcome. It went good 15:03:17 <anteaya> #link fix zuul's processing of periodic pipeline https://review.openstack.org/#/c/272123/ 15:03:23 <anteaya> eantyshev: awesome, thank you 15:03:31 <anteaya> mmedvede: I'm glad to hear that 15:03:33 <anteaya> :) 15:03:49 <anteaya> does anyone else have a periodic pipeline for their ci? 15:03:54 <anteaya> or tried to set one up? 15:04:08 <mmedvede> anteaya: we do. But we are using pinned zuul version 15:04:42 <eantyshev> anteaya: I also had periodic pipelines some time ago, and it worked then 15:04:51 <anteaya> mmedvede: which zuul version? 15:05:08 <anteaya> eantyshev: okay great, so this is a regression as you point out in your commit message 15:05:14 <anteaya> thanks for including that history 15:06:10 <anteaya> so reviewing eantyshev's patch will be helpful 15:06:14 <anteaya> thanks eantyshev 15:06:26 <anteaya> does anyone have anything else they would like to discuss today? 15:06:29 <eantyshev> if nobody minds, I'll make another proposal, for ciwatch 15:06:45 <anteaya> eantyshev: you have the floor 15:06:48 <eantyshev> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/274412 15:07:25 <mmedvede> eantyshev: I would look at this first thing 15:07:38 <anteaya> #link patch to add ciwatch filtering by project: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/274412 15:07:45 <eantyshev> this helps us to compare selected jobs of Jenkins (like dsvm-tempest-full) with our CI results 15:07:59 <anteaya> nice 15:08:09 <anteaya> I think that is a feature others have wanted as well 15:08:21 <anteaya> I hope your patch is well recieved 15:08:50 <eantyshev> mmedvede: I'm new to jquery etc., so I expect certain corrections 15:09:10 <eantyshev> thanks, anteaya 15:09:40 <anteaya> thank you for offering the patch 15:09:50 <anteaya> does anyone have anything more to share on this topic? 15:09:51 <lennyb> I have a question regarding ciwatch - does it support REST query? 15:10:09 <mmedvede> eantyshev: ciwatch is missing many features at the moment. And we decided to concentrate on refactoring codebase first. But we should not stop from improving it, and thank you for the patch 15:10:31 <lennyb> I am thinking about automatic compare between my CI and the others per commit 15:11:05 <anteaya> the readme doesn't mention a REST api for ciwatch: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/ciwatch/tree/README.rst 15:11:25 <lennyb> 1x0 15:11:33 <anteaya> lennyb: well gerrit supports a REST query 15:11:42 <mmedvede> anteaya: to answer your question about zuul version, I actually checked out to latest, but did not have chance to restart it, so might see the same regression eantyshev sees 15:11:54 <anteaya> and I'm guessing that ciwatch uses gerrit's REST api for its data 15:12:09 <anteaya> mmedvede: ah okay thanks, now you are prepared :) 15:12:22 <lennyb> anteaya: thanks. 15:12:26 <anteaya> welcome 15:12:39 <anteaya> but I do encourage you to continue to contribute to ciwatch 15:12:52 <anteaya> as I'm sure others using the tool have the same question as yourself 15:13:13 <eantyshev> mmedvede: could you please share the list of future improvements in ciwatch? 15:13:30 <mmedvede> anteaya: ciwatch is only using gerrit event stream to populate its database, not using gerrit API 15:13:37 <mmedvede> (yet) 15:14:13 <anteaya> ah 15:14:36 <anteaya> any thoughts to use the gerrit API? 15:14:48 <anteaya> has there been any discussion around that? 15:15:43 <mmedvede> #link ciwatch bug tracking https://bugs.launchpad.net/ciwatch 15:16:01 <mmedvede> #ling ciwatch blueprtints https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ciwatch 15:16:08 <mmedvede> #link ciwatch blueprtints https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ciwatch 15:16:29 <eantyshev> mmedvede: thanks! 15:16:32 <mmedvede> eantyshev: ^ some of the plans 15:16:36 <anteaya> thank you 15:16:56 <anteaya> #link ciwatch spec to use the REST api: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ciwatch/+spec/rest 15:17:17 <anteaya> any more discussion around ciwatch? 15:17:54 <anteaya> does anyone have anything else they would like to discuss today? 15:18:02 <mmedvede> anteaya: that link above could be confusing, it is not to use gerrit REST :) 15:18:13 <anteaya> oh okay yes I was confused 15:18:15 <mmedvede> but to implement ciwatch's rest 15:18:28 <mmedvede> need better description 15:18:32 <anteaya> ah thank you for the clarification there 15:19:03 <anteaya> so to answer my own question, there hasn't been any discussion to use the gerrit REST api to get data for ciwatch 15:19:10 <anteaya> correct? 15:20:08 <anteaya> I'm fine if that is the case, just trying to keep up with status 15:20:51 <anteaya> more here or shall we move on? 15:21:07 <mmedvede> anteaya: there was. iirc, we thought it might be good to use REST api to complement data acquired from event stream - I need to check irc logs. But at the moment it would complicate codebase too much 15:21:24 <anteaya> mmedvede: okay thanks, fair enough 15:21:34 <anteaya> okay to move onto next topic? 15:21:41 <mmedvede> yes 15:21:46 <anteaya> thanks 15:21:59 <anteaya> does anyone have anything else they would like to discuss today? 15:22:22 <lennyb> nope. 15:22:28 <anteaya> thanks lennyb 15:22:39 <anteaya> any objections to me closing the meeting? 15:23:10 <anteaya> thanks all for your kind attendance and participation today 15:23:22 <anteaya> I hope you all enjoy the rest of the day/evening 15:23:27 <anteaya> see you all next week 15:23:28 <lennyb> u2 15:23:31 <anteaya> #endmeeting