17:00:01 #startmeeting training-guides 17:00:02 Meeting started Mon Mar 2 17:00:01 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is rluethi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:00:04 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:00:06 The meeting name has been set to 'training_guides' 17:00:29 Good morning, good afternoon, or good evening, as the case may be. 17:00:54 Hello, good evening 17:01:01 hi 17:01:03 hey hey 17:01:21 hello 17:01:21 we're without sean, right? 17:01:26 correct. 17:01:30 matjazp: yes, do I smell something? 17:02:10 well, sean left us with an agenda. 17:02:20 * matjazp has showered, honestly ;) 17:02:24 #topic state of juno slides 17:03:06 So I gather matjazp is going to merge the slides as-is, to be cleaned up soonish!? 17:03:07 rluethi: I was going to merge fist 2 patches 17:03:40 rluethi: right. they are not slides as is, but patches should be smaller 17:04:01 I am somewhat concerned that merged large files to be cleaned up later means delaying clean-up indefinitely. 17:04:13 I agree 17:04:43 But since I don't work on slides, I value highly the opinions of those who do. 17:05:09 rluethi: I'm more worried that if we want to push "perfect" solution, it is still WAY off 17:05:15 So, matjazp, dguitarbite, can we merge one or two and have these cleaned up before we merge more. 17:05:35 and I want to enable community to work on PARTS of slides with smaller patches 17:05:36 Is there some kind of emergancy? 17:05:38 matjazp: yeah, that's certainly a valid concern, too. 17:06:10 dguitarbite: if we have no content other than the scripts and upstream U, it will become an emergency eventually. 17:06:55 rluethi: I agree with you 17:07:07 so I guess the question is: what is the best path to get the necessary clean-up done ASAP? 17:07:19 but it can also be If it cannot be cleaned up as of now, it may not be cleaned up even when its merged. 17:07:47 so who can do the clean-up, realistically speaking? 17:08:20 well... now the content is "locked up" in a review and maybe some who would like to help "stays out" of such a large patch 17:08:26 I don't see myself working on anything other than the scripts, at least for the the time being. 17:08:47 matjazp: sounds plausible. 17:08:51 I am busy with hosting events in India on top of labs scripts, python port, openstack koans 17:09:15 but I agree with matjazp, lets merge them there are no other concerns 17:09:17 noone likes to fiddle with other ppls patches 17:09:18 so, it would have to be sean or matjazp, is that it? 17:09:48 I can help, but I would rather see it as a smaller patches anyway 17:09:59 I have too many un finished patches of my own atm :/ 17:10:25 matjazp: my point is that if you can help with small patches, then it might be a good idea to merge. 17:10:49 if it's only sean, _he_ should have no problem fiddling with his own patches. 17:11:13 rluethi: I'm still hoping that community will help if they see it 17:11:34 matjazp: I am afraid they will take what they see as an example of how to do it. 17:12:12 I agree with rluethi 17:12:12 matjazp: I will make no attempt at blocking your merging the patches, I am just stating my concerns. 17:12:19 I believe it is better to have something in the repo that someone can adapt and make better than to have blank slate 17:13:05 matjazp: you have a point. but how many people dare to take the axe to existing content and trim it down? 17:13:30 matjazp: a few brief slides that can be extended would seem to be a better starting point. 17:14:32 rluethi: that means to axe a mayority of seans patch 17:15:19 matjazp: that's my point. you did say that they are still way too long for slides. 17:15:33 matjazp: if we can't cut them down, do you think the community will? 17:16:01 matjazp: I could see the community extending them, but reworking them in a different, more terse style? 17:16:15 community == we (at first :) 17:16:46 matjazp: can we at least have a leading or trailing slide that says "please rework these slides to look more like upstream training (link here)" ? 17:17:18 rluethi: ok, I will try with an example and we'll see how it goes, OK? 17:17:24 matjazp: or is there a simple way to separate slide text from notes? 17:17:42 matjazp: that would be awesome. 17:18:04 matjazp: (I meant your suggestion) 17:18:15 sure 17:18:47 matjazp: if we can separate text from slides, I might be tempted to have a go myself. 17:19:04 basically, throw everything in notes and a few key terms back into the slide. 17:19:16 rluethi: yes, that was my intention 17:19:25 perfect. 17:19:55 rluethi: I just wanted to do that in a different patch... hence... merge as is 17:20:06 not all chapters, just one or two 17:20:29 matjazp: like i said, I have no intention of blocking you. if you do it this way, I will be a very happy camper. 17:21:11 #action matjazp will merge some slide decks and rework them so they can serve as examples 17:21:36 #topic landing page 17:21:44 updates? 17:22:17 anyone? 17:23:18 didn't sean work on it? 17:23:23 from last weeks, meeting, I take it it was mostly sean's thing. 17:23:24 no idea 17:23:30 so there. 17:23:35 you know.. a separate button or smth like that 17:23:41 #action sarob will report next week 17:23:55 #topic Merge sphinx or landslide, and if so, only for upstream or for all slides? 17:24:29 did we make any progress since matjazp fixed the blocker last week? 17:25:04 I think we sort of agreed that we don't want to have two different programs for building slides in the long run, at least. 17:25:13 but there may be a transition period or something!? 17:25:24 sorry, memory is blurry. 17:25:27 does anyone remember? 17:25:47 rluethi: yes, sean wants to go with landslide, reed doesn't care about format 17:25:49 oh, it was another sarob item. 17:26:04 hi vigneshvar 17:26:06 format shouldn't matter 17:26:42 hi 17:26:55 matjazp: I understand there are slight differences, and everyone else seems to be using sphinx, so in the long run we should probably have sphinx!? 17:27:01 I think sarob and I overlapped and did both work to move in the other's direction 17:27:19 vigneshvar: hi 17:27:25 reed: what do you suggest we do? 17:27:59 what's the easiest for you? I really don't care 17:28:47 we have infra already set up for landslide? 17:28:50 I don't have a stake in it, either, but like I said it _seems_ that we should do sphinx at some point because that's what OpenStack projects use. 17:29:06 whats the status on that? we have landslide.sh that builds slides 17:30:26 maybe we should not have a vote on this while sarob is not here. 17:30:39 I guess that's why sean wanted to use landslide for now and change to whatever later 17:31:37 reed: would that be okay with you? use landslide for everything for now and transition to sphinx in the next cycle? 17:33:26 reed? 17:34:17 #info no resolution on landslide/sphinx, needs to be revisited next week 17:34:23 ok with the vote 17:34:25 reed: Another question is how much transition work has been done on upstream content? 17:34:29 #undo 17:34:31 Removing item from minutes: 17:34:41 reed: in terms of porting the slides format 17:34:49 dguitarbite, not a lot, and they suck anyway 17:35:07 reed: so landslide sounds good to you? 17:35:12 I'll have to sync up with the teachers next week to see what they like to use 17:35:16 reed: I gathered from your comments last week that both formats suck equally. correct? 17:35:36 dguitarbite, I can't stand neither, frankly :) 17:35:42 reed, i7m just curious, do you see any other format/solution that could be better? 17:35:49 reed: :) 17:36:07 matjazp: I have been through this, its near to impossible 17:36:14 to get anything closer to the current systems 17:36:22 matjazp, the best option is google docs, quite frankly 17:36:45 i'll have to talk to the teachers and see what they are confortable doing 17:37:07 if they have time they may help fix the slides and go in a repo, whatever format will do 17:37:16 reed: when would you be able to report back what the teachers think? 17:37:27 otherwise I expect they'll just fix things 'one off' 17:37:34 rluethi, give me two weeks 17:37:40 we should have this conversation over the docs ML IMO 17:38:31 #action reed will ask teachers re: landslide/sphinx and report back on March 16 17:38:42 cool, thanks, reed. 17:38:47 np 17:38:49 #topic any other business 17:39:39 AV videos need some attention now 17:40:01 can you elaborate? 17:40:04 rluethi: maybe wee need to clean up bugs list 17:40:15 We need the osbash on windows and linux videos soonish 17:40:34 ppl are taking old bugs and wonder where to put them 17:40:45 dguitarbite: is your issue with windows solved yet? 17:40:54 matjazp: didn't sean and dguitarbite clean up bugs? 17:40:56 sayali: I did not look into it further 17:41:13 sayali: My machine is old and fragile, I will try this at the end of this month if I get time 17:41:30 rluethi: some bugs were ported back from openstack-manuals 17:41:30 Also, I will make a image for training-guides videos which can be used in all the vidoes 17:41:34 videos* 17:41:35 rluethi: not enough.. see ML 17:41:50 rluethi: matjazp: these bugs are out of our domain 17:42:11 dguitarbite: ok, I will try it on my end too then. 17:42:12 I have a strong belief that it was a rare situation, we need to take action if that repeats 17:42:19 sayali: thanks :) 17:42:25 is vigneshvar around? 17:42:33 sayali: he was. 17:42:49 he as poor internet connectivity at his place 17:42:56 ah ok. 17:44:28 matjazp: I have to admit I haven't looked much at the bug db, because every time I look it seems to be all ancient docs bugs. 17:44:55 rluethi: yes, and thats the problem. 17:45:07 matjazp: can't we just mark all icehouse docs bugs "won't fix"? 17:45:21 if someone want's to help, they should see new bugs for current content 17:45:48 matjazp: yes. unless sayali wants to use them as low-hanging fruit bugs for training :-). 17:46:36 rluethi: we decided to send dummy patches to training-guides instead for the workshops 17:47:01 sayali: I use openstack-dev/sandbox 17:47:18 also we can abandon bugs right? 17:47:18 okay, so matjazp (and everyone else), close all Icehouse bugs "won't fix"? 17:47:23 rluethi: audience skill set is not upto the mark for actual bug fixes for our time constraints 17:47:26 sayali: everyone there is a core, so the can test beeing core too :) 17:48:02 matjazp: oh that's cool. I will check it out! 17:48:50 sayali: just try not to merge or just clean up afterwards after them 17:49:25 matjazp: okay 17:50:17 once after this topic, i would like to update on the AV work 17:50:28 vigneshvar: sure, go ahead 17:50:33 shoot. 17:50:38 sorry for the delay i have not completed yet 17:50:58 but i have found some useful tools used for video editting 17:51:02 in linux 17:51:24 with that we can make multiple videos as "scenes" 17:51:34 and merge them to single video 17:51:35 vigneshvar: ok, you can put the link for those on the AV etherpad. 17:51:44 sayali: sure 17:51:57 ok, so you can stop the video as you like? 17:52:17 the advantage of taking as "scenes" is, it is easy to update parts of video 17:52:40 Also, I think we should have both the videos for osbash in this month 17:53:03 i will be completing one soon, i have almost done with video 17:53:09 vigneshvar: right, that sounds good. Ill take a look. 17:53:12 i need to add audio now 17:53:32 with that tool i can add audio separate 17:54:01 ok great. We need to add a training-guides logo kind of thing on each video 17:54:14 So that they all look uniform, as we had discussed earlier 17:54:28 I will add that and send it to everyone 17:54:44 somebody draw a stack train. 17:54:46 sayali: sure 17:54:47 then you could use it in the video too 17:55:02 rluethi: for? 17:55:14 "a logo kind of thing" 17:55:28 the tool is called openshot 17:55:34 rluethi: ahh, you got me excited there for a second ;) 17:55:51 rluethi: haha I was thinking more on the lines of using the OpenStack logo with training guides written under it 17:56:05 sayali: how ordinary. 17:56:42 * sayali will try to make it more interesting :D 17:57:27 * rluethi is looking forward to seeing new AV material 17:57:51 I think this might be a good time to call it a day. 17:58:00 yep 17:58:15 gents, ladies, it's been a pleasure. 17:58:18 #endmeeting