17:05:50 #startmeeting training-guides 17:05:51 Meeting started Mon Jun 22 17:05:50 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is rluethi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:05:52 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:05:54 The meeting name has been set to 'training_guides' 17:06:36 hi 17:06:37 #link https://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot 17:06:50 and now you know. hi vigneshvar_ 17:06:51 hi vigneshvar_ 17:07:29 alright. short agenda, as has been the case for a while. 17:07:47 #topic reviews 17:08:11 matjazp, did I miss anything I should have reviewed? 17:08:31 rluethi: not this time. There were other votes 17:08:36 hi vigneshvar_ 17:08:55 matjazp: other votes? 17:09:00 I'm just not comfortable with merging if there are no other votes 17:09:09 even with trivial patches 17:09:35 rluethi: we managed to get votes by other community members 17:09:36 matjazp: I see. I tried to pay attention, but I didn't see anything that seemed to need me. 17:09:56 rluethi: I'll ping you in the comment if we need you 17:10:01 rluethi: like we agreed 17:10:16 matjazp: okay, just checking, I want to live up to my promises. 17:10:38 so, anything in the review queue that needs discussion? 17:10:43 hello 17:10:53 hi sayalilunkad 17:10:58 sayalilunkad: hi 17:11:01 no but I got something that would make matjazp happy 17:11:17 sayalilunkad: hi 17:11:42 dguitarbite: do I need to change the topic for that? 17:11:57 rluethi, no 17:11:59 i'm all ears :) 17:12:11 the rst is published on the gerrit 17:12:48 where? 17:13:01 matjazp, http://docs-draft.openstack.org/83/191783/1/check/gate-training-guides-tox-doc-publish-checkbuild/ea783a0//publish-docs/draft/ 17:13:25 just check that, the job which states http://docs-draft.openstack.org/83/191783/1/check/gate-training-guides-tox-doc-publish-checkbuild/ea783a0//publish-docs/ 17:13:28 sorry 17:13:40 the name of the job is gate-training-guides-tox-doc-publish-checkbuild 17:14:18 dguitarbite: that's for upstream only? it's done for a while now.. I hoped for training guides? 17:14:59 I just have to update the tox.ini 17:15:13 I was thinking that we need to have some stable content before I can add that 17:15:18 because it will start publishing the slides 17:15:29 dguitarbite: for draft publishing we dont 17:16:03 dguitarbite: and it's much easier to review content when you can see it rendered, not just looking at RST text 17:16:18 If the team agrees I will enable it 17:17:06 I don't see the problem with draft in gerrit... Just don't publish on the docs web page yet... 17:17:11 whatever makes matjazp happy and reviewing easier. 17:17:33 yes, mostly we will start publishing from docs.openstack.org/draft 17:17:41 we could get away with unstable content up there 17:17:42 I mean don't publish yet for training guides... upstream is ready 17:17:48 since the direct links are not published 17:19:02 isn't doc-publish-checkbuild only to publish in the gate? it publishes on the docs.openstack.org pages too? 17:19:11 not yet 17:19:27 but I will enable it and there will be only one infra job for it to keep the load on infra lesser 17:20:30 that is two steps, right? first enable publishing in the gerit, second is to enable publishing on the doc pages 17:20:34 so its limited from tox.ini 17:21:19 I have to take a look again, I dont remember what exaclty I did in there. 17:21:51 dguitarbite: it'sin tox we have two things: checkbuild and publishdocs 17:21:53 but there are two jobs build and publish 17:22:12 as of now, both are run twice 17:23:05 as I see it, it currently enables us to publish on the docs page just upstream training, and to add gerrit publishing for the training guides only too 17:23:43 lets continue this on the ML 17:23:53 so we should at least publish upstream material, it's finished and tested 17:24:25 let me check everything once more but as far as I remember I have configured both publish and checkbuild jobs in infra (not in training guides tox.ini) to be run on before and after the review 17:24:53 dguitarbite: ok do that and report to the ML please 17:25:29 so, we done with that topic for now? 17:25:44 I'm good 17:25:52 okay, then 17:26:19 #topic labs scripts 17:26:35 #info rluethi is a bozo, his Juno scripts are broken and need fixing. 17:26:52 * dguitarbite is the catalyst ... dont ignore him 17:27:07 rluethi: I checked the neutron config 17:27:13 networking is somehow not set up correctly. 17:27:46 it seems to be fine.. atleast the config files seem ok 17:27:50 the instance VM gets an IP address from the DHCP server, but it cannot even ping the default gateway. 17:28:12 yeah 17:28:14 sayalilunkad: thanks for looking into it. 17:28:36 I will do a Juno deployment manually once to check again 17:28:58 i will try it too 17:29:15 thanks everyone, we could really do with some help tracking this down. 17:29:37 and also for labs, the install-guides team is happy to use our scripts 17:29:39 maybe check the actual configuration of the various network devices. 17:30:08 dguitarbite: not if the scripts are broken :-/ 17:30:30 rluethi, yes, that makes it more important 17:30:36 rluethi: we need more tests 17:30:44 the install guides team wants a multinode deployment job 17:30:46 rluethi: so we can detect these regressions 17:30:59 which will be awesome because our scripts will be checked on a regular basis :D 17:31:07 matjazp: problem is, our fabulous test script showed the error clearly, it just wasn't run in a while. 17:31:51 I was sure I had used it to check the scripts, but either I was wrong or the Ubuntu packages have changed. 17:32:35 ubuntu updates are also quite guilty 17:32:36 rluethi: I remember deploying th cluster after the juno functional patch too .. funny we missed it 17:32:43 also the ubuntu version updates 17:32:47 dguitarbite: true 17:33:08 I still cannot believe that Ubuntu just rips of the milestones of a stable release 17:33:17 just removes the isos from the mirrors 17:33:19 :O 17:33:37 good thing we have them cached :) 17:33:44 yes 17:33:51 we need CI 17:33:58 matjazp: agreed 17:34:08 matjazp: +1 17:34:37 our main issue with CI is the virtualbox dependency. 17:34:58 yes, that makes it very difficult 17:35:14 rluethi, do not worry about that 17:35:16 I doubt they have anything to support Vbox related testing 17:35:18 we get the KVM stuff rolling 17:36:23 true that would make life easier 17:36:34 dguitarbite: that means getting the python code mature enough to replace osbash wholesale, or getting the kvm support in osbash cleaned up. 17:36:49 prior is better 17:36:51 but we wold still support vbox so we will need that too 17:36:51 either way, it won't happen today. 17:36:53 work is almost the same 17:37:03 the install guides automated testing has some time 17:37:15 we have a few months worth of breathing room as of now 17:37:55 that's good 17:40:07 alright, if anyone makes progress fixing the Juno config (you know you fixed it if you can successfully run the launch_instance.sh with the Juno scripts), please let everyone know. 17:40:31 yep yep 17:40:35 sure 17:40:37 #topic anything else 17:41:09 are we done then? 17:41:20 yeah 17:41:39 nothing else from my side 17:41:53 me too 17:41:56 well then, bye everyone. see you next week or so. 17:41:59 #endmeeting