20:00:04 #startmeeting training-manuals 20:00:05 Meeting started Mon Jul 22 20:00:04 2013 UTC. The chair is sarob. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 20:00:05 just zoomed over tehachapi pass and found LTE connectivity #WIN 20:00:06 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 20:00:08 The meeting name has been set to 'training_manuals' 20:00:54 we have sarob and colinmcnamara present 20:01:08 who else joins us 20:02:18 #topic who, what is core 20:02:57 when I was tagging core in trello 20:03:09 it was items that were seperate from content 20:03:18 ahh, right 20:03:27 i was thinking core team 20:03:31 oh, gothca 20:03:35 like def in wiki 20:03:59 does what I put into the the wiki https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Training-manuals 20:04:21 seem the way to defn? 20:04:22 gotcha, on same page now 20:04:27 agree 20:04:34 very accurate actually 20:04:37 okay, coolness 20:05:08 so we what good spread of skills 20:05:32 and commitment to get the the sprint when we schedule it out 20:05:36 3-4 weeks 20:06:02 you are suggesting a 3-4 sprint duration? 20:06:21 and suggesting that the core team manages commitments to deliver in those sprints? 20:06:25 nope, one sprint, 3-5 days, in 3-4 weeks 20:06:26 I agree with those statements 20:06:30 ahh 20:06:40 we all get in one room 20:06:49 build on bones we 20:06:54 are putting together now 20:07:04 for me, those are doable depending on the schedule. I need to get it on the calendar ahead of time though 20:07:11 right me too 20:07:19 so mark voelker 20:07:26 mestery 20:07:33 they are in for that? 20:08:01 we need to check, now that we have defied the responsibility levels for core 20:08:15 probably need to layout sub-core (or pick a friendlier name) 20:08:22 so we can present them with multiple options 20:08:37 outer core 20:08:56 mantle 20:09:48 core mantle crust 20:09:49 community ? 20:10:10 for what? 20:10:17 the level below core 20:10:41 so core, community, extended 20:10:48 that sounds very inclusive 20:10:51 which is good 20:10:59 okay, i buy that 20:11:04 this may seem odd, but I love the idea of 20:11:12 a new user or community organizer 20:11:21 seeing each level as a step up, and inclusive 20:11:39 sound right to me 20:11:56 so i will update the wiki with the new name for sub-core 20:12:46 #action sarob change sub-core team name to community 20:13:45 #action sarob: colinmcnamara: get 4 people signed up for core 20:13:58 #action sarob: get 4 people signed up for core 20:14:09 #action colinmcnamara: get 4 people signed up for core 20:14:32 done with this topic? 20:14:40 just updated the trello card reflecting 4 20:14:43 yes, done 20:14:55 #topic update on getting training published to docs.openstack.org 20:16:02 I'm looking through my calendar to see the dates that Anne had called out 20:16:03 it looks like we need to update 3 files, manuals.yaml, layout.yaml, and the doc.openstack.org index file 20:16:25 dates for the docs meeting? 20:16:27 I got that as feedback on my submistion 20:16:45 let me answer your questions first 20:17:04 when I pick the review, to patch it 20:17:27 I'm getting an error, I think because patches were submitted after I branched 20:17:30 and I need to merge 20:17:36 I'll be back in the office starting tomorrow morning 20:17:40 for the next two weeks 20:17:43 okay 20:18:15 my target is to get it figured out tomorrow morning 20:18:17 i wanted to get training published to docs before this weeks hackathon if possible 20:18:34 so before thursday would be soon enough 20:18:51 yeah, should be good 20:19:01 this is my first time going through submitting patches to a review 20:19:06 you had to figure that out last week right? 20:19:20 here is the review in question https://review.openstack.org/#/c/37388/ 20:19:45 right 20:20:03 plan is to publish training to doc.openstack.org/grizzly/training 20:20:07 error I get - Errors running git rebase -i remotes/gerrit/master 20:20:07 error: could not apply 4e5cf4b... Blueprint - CI coverage for OpenStack Training within OpenStack Manuals https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+spec/training-manuals 20:20:27 I'll have to change the yaml file to grizzly vs trunk 20:20:37 okay 20:20:40 but that is simple once I find out what I am borking in the patching workflow 20:21:28 it looks like the build worked, just blair and boylan wanted some changes 20:21:40 correct. it was good feedback 20:21:47 it's somethign locally with my setup 20:21:51 I think I need to rebase manually 20:22:01 need to whip out the pro-git book to figure it out 20:22:05 i still have issues with rebasing 20:22:25 it fried my local 20:22:37 on monday 20:22:43 I tried just checking out a fresh repositiory, then checking out the review branch, and ammending 20:22:48 still nogo 20:22:51 had to blow it all away 20:23:00 and then it worked? 20:23:05 yup 20:23:18 I might blow it away again tommorrow morning 20:23:19 we should figure out how to rebase correctly 20:23:30 and document the workflow 20:23:35 right 20:23:38 some chapters out of pro-git are in my future 20:23:45 ;) 20:23:50 http://git-scm.com/book 20:24:06 #action colinmcnamara publish training to doc.openstack.org/grizzly/training 20:24:30 #topic CI test coverage 20:24:56 are you planning on tweaking this separately from above? 20:25:14 I am just trying to get it to work 20:25:37 I guess I could just abandon the change, and submit new 20:25:50 and if I can't figure the workflow out by COB tuesday 20:25:54 then I will do just that 20:26:29 I'll submit fresh code, with all of the commentary taken into account as a seperate contribution 20:26:42 okay, i was trying to understand if you merging ci test coverage and publishing into one patch or two 20:26:58 into one 20:27:03 okay 20:27:20 it is a statement in the bottom of the section covering openstack-training 20:27:43 by publish are you saying showing up in the index? or a deep link? 20:27:52 i will continue to work on local clean maven builds so you can run ci maven with validation 20:28:23 right publish 20:28:58 I just realized that I didnt grab the maven resource declaration chapter that I had read 20:28:59 im fine with an up front link with /grizzly/training 20:29:23 the reason I bring that up however, is that I need to figure out how to update that site 20:29:32 I don't think that is updated from Jenkins 20:29:35 if we do that, I will need to add something like a rough draft watermark or something 20:29:38 or, automatically 20:29:40 exactly 20:29:47 and run it by Anne 20:29:59 I'd hate for a new user 20:30:03 the infra team owns the index file 20:30:14 i remember seeing a patch for it 20:30:14 to stumble into it, and run down a path and get stuck 20:30:19 ok 20:30:30 vs beta's being run through the users groups 20:30:39 so we can capture feedback, and help people through errors 20:30:42 cant find it again though, looked through repos 20:31:05 prob just a quick question for infra channel 20:31:11 good point 20:31:39 no action here, covered in previous topic 20:31:44 great point on the watermark btw 20:32:01 ill see what i can do 20:32:26 #topic review of what goes into trello, wiki, and blueprint 20:33:06 do you think we have the right stuff in these three places? 20:33:34 for now 20:33:51 I think that in a future state our kanban board should be closer linked into the infra systems 20:34:05 oh, probably want to output the weekly board state 20:34:09 and either paste it into here 20:34:13 or put in in the wiki 20:34:21 hmm, that sounds cool 20:34:58 we are going to need to keep the wiki uptodate 20:35:07 its already too big 20:35:12 should we put that in the wiki? or the meeting notes? 20:35:40 my thought was the blueprint is our reason for existing 20:35:53 ok 20:36:05 but keep it as clean as possible, with patch updates only 20:36:22 the blueprint page 20:36:25 ? 20:36:26 wiki defines what the blueprint specification is 20:36:40 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+spec/training-manuals 20:36:51 agreed 20:37:16 so then the kanban board is our work in progress, plans 20:37:50 and specifically, a place to manage flow 20:37:59 you and i will need to keep all three as fresh and clean as possible 20:38:03 and for the team to see what tasks are prioritized and available for pick up next 20:38:05 right 20:38:10 I was going to bring that up 20:38:18 basically being a scrum/ban nazi 20:38:35 e.g. making sure when a patch is merged, that a card is moved 20:38:42 id like to start assigning chapters to the community team 20:38:46 from the board 20:39:06 me too 20:39:11 i think we are close 20:39:21 we get the pages published 20:39:32 I envision the community pulling from the story qeueus 20:39:36 get the bones laid out 20:39:45 and editing the bones that you are laying out 20:39:51 that way it is a low barrier ot entry 20:39:52 so maybe 20 community members? 20:40:07 thats pretty big, I'd hope we can grow it that large 20:40:22 10 core, 20 community, extended=user groups 20:40:35 me too 20:40:58 i figure that we will get active work out of half 20:41:05 week to week 20:41:22 sounds about right 20:41:29 would be interesting to use the in person meetups 20:41:34 to trigger bugs / work 20:41:37 graph that out 20:41:41 not really a sprint 20:41:53 but, similar effect 20:42:32 #action sarob colinmcnamara continue to keep the wiki, kanban board fresh 20:42:59 I'll volunteer to be the kanban nazi 20:43:17 that would be cool to have an weekly activity graph 20:43:30 move on? 20:43:52 #action colinmcnamara will be kanban lead 20:44:24 #topic doc-core update 20:44:54 so i tried out merging my own patches 20:45:20 kinda wierd and self-serving, but pretty quick 20:45:44 zuul picked it up within minutes 20:46:20 try it, you'll like it 20:48:15 you were running off a perth au freenode server 20:48:17 sarob: back. internat access 20:48:21 really? 20:48:23 wow 20:48:26 just auto logged in 20:48:33 now texas 20:48:37 sitting in a field outside of bakersfield 20:48:44 first place I could get LTE 20:48:48 on my drive back from havasu 20:48:54 all cool, thx for joining 20:49:01 i would have been lonely 20:49:26 Definition of core, attends IRC meetings ;) 20:49:40 even if that means driving 90 MPH over tehachapi pass 20:49:41 right, that good with me 20:49:56 ok, I have a burnd down chart btw 20:50:09 and since we aren't really enforcing a sprint right now 20:50:13 well, it shows inverse 20:50:26 the last time i did that on grapevine it didnt end well 20:50:58 already had a CHP convo while stopped 20:51:26 so try out your new powers of doc-core 20:51:42 zuul will pick up the build job within minutes 20:52:03 really? 20:52:05 wow 20:52:12 I'm going to add that to my day tomorrow 20:52:26 as in, once I review 20:52:31 that it will build and merge? 20:52:37 our powers of rebase will need to be strong 20:52:48 git jujitsu 20:52:51 interesting note 20:52:53 as more of us start piling on 20:52:57 when you think about our journey here 20:53:16 we are proving the concept that working on Doc's eases a user into contribution workflows 20:53:22 true 20:53:23 I'm learning new stuff all the time 20:53:41 aob? 20:53:48 ? 20:53:53 any other business 20:53:54 oab? 20:53:56 none 20:54:08 sweet 20:54:33 lets get our new cores/victims in next irc meeting 20:54:49 agreed. I'll ping you tomorrow re: CI merge 20:54:56 and see you on thursday? 20:55:03 roger that 20:55:30 ill help with the ci merge, tweet me to get my attention 20:55:40 thx dude, I appreciate it 20:55:42 if you need it 20:56:03 probably will. though I'll bang my head up against a wall for the morning ;) 20:56:47 if thats all, I'll get back on the road 20:56:48 manson real loud helps with that 20:57:01 yup, im done, thanks for your time 20:57:11 likewise 20:57:14 signing off 20:57:16 #endmeeting