02:03:03 #startmeeting training-manuals 02:03:04 Meeting started Wed Sep 25 02:03:03 2013 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is colinmcnamara. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 02:03:05 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 02:03:07 The meeting name has been set to 'training_manuals' 02:03:16 Thx :) 02:03:16 better? 02:03:21 Yup 02:03:27 ok, 2 more min and I'll kick it off 02:03:38 I'm on phone with bad reception 02:03:50 no worries 02:03:53 So I will phase in and out 02:04:02 it's just you and I right now 02:04:09 60 second warning 02:04:52 its go time. Kicking meeting off 02:05:03 first topic 02:05:06 #Topic - Proposed Topics 02:05:31 1. Burn Down Status 02:05:31 2. Major Blocking issues 02:05:31 3. RST - Docbooks Status 02:05:33 4. david kramer log bug standard 70% done 02:05:35 5. check for prior commit 02:05:48 are there any other topics that anyone would like to propose 02:05:49 ? 02:05:55 Nope 02:06:08 #info no additional proposed topics 02:06:15 changing topic 02:06:16 #Topic Burn Down Status 02:06:37 this last week was a very productive week for the project 02:06:37 I'm going to be offline for 15min 02:06:40 ok 02:06:46 it's only you and I 02:06:52 I will run through the meeting for the logs 02:07:01 If you want to hold I'll be back 02:07:01 on Sept 16 - 43 hours completed 02:07:06 Or not 02:07:11 Up to you 02:07:26 sure, what time will you return? 02:07:51 7:20? 02:08:18 #topic meeting break until 7:20 PDT 02:21:10 I'm back 02:21:19 I'm back 02:21:40 Cool thx dude 02:22:32 cool 02:22:45 #topic meeting break end. 02:22:56 #Topic Burn Down Status 02:23:01 ok, back on track 02:23:15 last weeks meeting we had 43 cards completed 02:23:25 as of today we have 59 02:23:32 that is a huge increase 02:23:48 this work brought the estimated burn down date from 12/22 to 12/1 02:23:56 even with 5 cards added 02:24:05 https://BurndownForTrello.com/share/9c3rfd2fu9 02:24:05 5 extra cards added - not in backlog 02:24:05 02:24:06 Total Cards:134Remaining Cards:75Done Cards:59Percent of cards done:Hours at start:80Hours est total:134Hours remaining:75Hours done:59Percent of hours done:--------Days Elapsed54Daily Burndown1.09Est. Days Left68Est. Completion Date12/01/13 02:24:29 Summary stats 02:24:29 Total Cards: 134 02:24:29 Remaining Cards: 75 02:24:30 Done Cards: 59 02:24:32 Percent of cards done: 44.03% 02:24:34 Hours at start: 80 02:24:36 Hours est total: 134 02:24:38 Hours remaining: 75 02:24:40 Hours done: 59 02:24:42 Percent of hours done: 44.03% 02:24:44 ---- ---- 02:24:46 Days Elapsed 54 02:24:48 Daily Burndown 1.09 02:24:50 Est. Days Left 68 02:24:52 Est. Completion Date 12/01/13 02:24:54 thats better 02:24:58 any questions / comments on our burn down rate? 02:25:15 Nope 02:25:27 #topic Major Blocking issues 02:26:07 Rst to xml? 02:26:19 I don't see any current issues blocking work, though I do forsea the RST to XML becoming an issue in 2 weeks 02:26:34 I think that we need to figure it out in relatively short order 02:27:04 I would say that it needs to be a status topic on next weeks meeting. and if there isn't forward process that we set a date the week after to do something ghetto 02:27:08 but I do think we are close 02:27:22 Aren't the dev rst docs where roles info should come from? 02:27:32 roles info? 02:27:46 I've been mining them for the concepts and technology overview 02:27:48 sections 02:27:53 they are a gold mine 02:28:26 I'm going to do a sample run of pandoc tomorrow 02:28:34 good, let's multi-thread it 02:28:52 i'm at home all week, (no airplanes or cars) so I should make progress too 02:28:58 Any advice on tags to convert to 02:29:05 Sections? 02:29:06 I suggest let's over communicate if either finds something interesting 02:29:20 Sounds good 02:29:30 so, the output is article - section -section - section 02:29:39 lots of work, won't get solved tonight 02:30:04 but I suggest that we both work on it, and then when kramer gets done with the bug link we rope him in 02:30:10 Hmm, if I can just parse the article 02:30:40 I suggest we both try alternate methods, and then compare our findings and communicate 02:30:47 Sure, new bug file cool 02:30:48 it might just take a second set of eyes 02:30:58 Sure 02:31:10 moving on 02:31:12 #topic - david kramer log bug standard 70% done 02:31:26 Very nifty 02:31:33 have you been following david's work on auto bug creation? 02:31:38 Yup 02:31:52 me too 02:31:53 I'm ready to replace ours with his 02:32:01 When it's ready 02:32:15 is it added at post, or in the xml? 02:32:53 Xml I believe 02:32:54 I would agree that we should go and edit our XML, though I want to discuss whether that should be added to the backlog and we just change the example 02:33:15 just being aware of adding work that does not get us to an alpha 02:33:58 your perspective? 02:34:57 sarob: ? 02:35:00 If it's easy replacement of a few lines, then it's okay with me 02:35:16 Otherwise it cab wait 02:35:21 Can 02:35:31 let's see what it looks like. 02:35:38 Yup 02:35:44 #topic check for prior commit - rebase / merge 02:36:20 so, last week I merged some code 02:36:37 that overwrote bk001-ch003... 02:36:55 that was my bad for not reviewing with a diff the chapter file 02:37:10 Ah, right 02:37:15 I worked out the proper procedure for dealing with that, and it is kind of complicated 02:37:29 involves a git rebase 02:37:36 So you rebased? 02:37:40 yup 02:37:53 it was a pain, but I think I can get it down to not a pain 02:38:19 Yeah, had to rebase 02:38:26 Once last week too 02:38:46 I think it will become second hand. but we may want to update the primary docs to have people check for a commit ahead of them 02:38:54 most likely documented with treeview 02:39:02 and then document the rebase procedure 02:39:26 Sounds great 02:39:39 and .. I think both of us need to make sure to take a close look at bk001-ch003... each time we merge in the review site to make sure lines aren't deleted 02:39:49 Yup 02:40:42 oh, think I should add one more topic 02:41:00 Okey dokey 02:41:00 #topic - sfbay meetup goal for next week 02:41:38 I'm assuming the goal is to get contributors, I think we will be at a point by mid next week that we should be able to get a bunch of commits 02:42:09 to keep focusing on increasing the average card rate 02:42:22 which will bring in our date 02:42:35 Sounds good 02:43:06 oh, and I have a couple new team members coming on line in the next few weeks. So expect increasing commits from NexusIS 02:43:12 Sweet 02:43:42 any other business ? 02:44:12 Nope 02:44:18 k, meeting adjuourned 02:44:21 Good stuff 02:44:22 #endmeeting