14:01:46 #startmeeting tricircle 14:01:47 Meeting started Wed Apr 5 14:01:46 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is joehuang. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:01:48 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:01:51 The meeting name has been set to 'tricircle' 14:01:58 hi 14:03:06 #topic feature implementation review 14:03:42 let's have a short review on feature implementation 14:04:30 please have a brief description of the progress for the feature your are working 14:05:08 for Qos spec it is close to +2 and metering spec i will submit in this week 14:05:21 great 14:05:35 QoS has been reviewed many rounds 14:05:51 for lbaas, already solve the missing lb-mgmt-net in central neutron 14:06:07 how do you solve the issue 14:06:10 have some problem with plugging vip to amphora 14:06:27 for me, the async job admin api is committed, but it just an initial version. 14:06:28 delete the lb-mgmt-net in local neutron 14:06:38 then create one in central neutron 14:06:51 to Dongfeng, ok, will review that patch 14:07:01 to Yipei, good 14:07:16 and configure the new net and a security group id in octavia 14:07:20 and it works 14:07:28 what's the issue for plugging vip 14:07:40 could you describe in more detail 14:07:55 still checking logs 14:08:04 just find it today 14:08:53 for metering, the first patch about metering spec can be submit this week 14:09:08 do you mean to assign the allowed address pair to the amphora port? 14:09:20 to Jiawei, thanks a lot 14:09:47 plugging the amphora to the newly created port of vip 14:11:14 amphora should have it's own port, and the port will have allowed address pair which contains the IP of VIP 14:13:18 ok, maybe need more investigation on the issue 14:13:32 hi, sorry i am late 14:13:41 welcome 14:13:53 yes, i think maybe it is caused by allowed address pairs 14:13:57 now we are reviewing the feature implementation 14:14:29 currently i am working on the implementation of the multi-gateway feature 14:14:47 Hi Yipei, whether the amphora VM has been booted successfully? 14:15:27 to Zhiyuan, very good 14:15:59 to joe, no 14:16:01 Is there any challenge 14:16:19 for multi-gateway feature 14:16:50 the name of the port is octavia-lb-vrrp-1dcca3b0-082d-43e3-ae70-8378d3dad028 14:17:09 no, the new model can fit our original logic well. but we need to modify the logic for network-router location validation 14:17:34 to zhiyuan, that's perfect 14:17:50 a cross-pod network is not allowed to be attached to a local router before change 14:18:20 so one overlay L2 network can be attached to multi-local router after implementation 14:19:01 to Yipei, the port you attached is the VIP port, not the amphora port? 14:19:24 I change the validation condition. A network can be attached to a local router if the regions of the network include the region of the router 14:19:26 overlay L2 network -> cross pod overlay L2 network 14:19:42 great 14:20:01 i think it is not the amphora port 14:20:07 If the router is not local type, we follow the original condition 14:20:34 I think the networking topology could be simplified in OPNFV PoC if cross pod L2 network can be attached to multi-local router 14:21:14 it's up to whether application wants to use such a networking topology 14:21:35 for centralized router it works, but for DVR it may not work currently 14:22:50 for east-west between cross pod L2 network 14:22:59 yes, with the new model, we can attach cross-pod l2 network to multiple local routers 14:23:42 it's enough there is only one cross pod L2 network for one project in OPNFV summit 14:25:40 to Yipei, please go on to fix the issue for VIP port, please discuss that in the #openstack-tricircle if needed 14:26:00 ok, got it 14:26:33 #topic Pike-2 planning 14:26:57 hello, as we discussed in last weekly meeting 14:27:31 OpenStack pike-2 milestone will not fit the OPNFV summit very well 14:29:04 we may have to introduce one intermediately release to include features which are needed, or move pike-2 ahead of community milestone date 14:29:29 what's your thoughts? 14:29:57 and what's to include in this intermediately release? 14:30:50 i think Qos feature can include in this relaese 14:31:02 set the release date as the end of the May? 14:31:06 good, Ronghui 14:31:24 lbaas in one region can be included 14:31:31 I think multiple-gateway is esstential 14:31:51 zhiyuan, it's a little too late to integrate if we release at the end of may 14:32:14 yes, multi-gateway and flat network is essential 14:32:46 it'll be great to include QoS, LBaaS 14:33:17 I think the async job api can be included if there has one month of time. 14:34:06 Beijing Summit will be held on Jun.12 14:34:18 from Jun,12 to Jun.15 14:34:32 to Dongfeng, +1 14:36:31 then around May 7th? 14:37:52 There are one week for OpenStack summit from May 8~12 14:39:02 We may have to release before labor day 14:39:39 if we want to make sure applications can have time to do on-board integration 14:39:58 this deadline is fine for the multi-gateway and flat network feature 14:40:20 not sure for other planning features 14:40:27 I counted the work days after OpenStack summit, there are 3 weeks 14:40:47 it's tight application 14:41:06 sorry, it's tight schedule for application on board 14:41:20 first time to work on multi-site scenario 14:41:50 for other features, we'll try our best 14:42:16 we can follow openstack schedule to have pike-2' at Jun.9 14:43:04 if features which are not able to catch the May.1, then can be included in Jun.9 14:44:23 ok 14:44:36 ok 14:44:40 how about set the pike-2 on May.2, and pike-2' on Jun.9? 14:44:49 ok 14:44:52 fine for me 14:46:02 it is fine for me 14:46:35 ok 14:46:42 fine 14:47:10 the name could be more accurate: pike-1.5 on May.2, pike-2 on Jun.9 14:47:29 no conflict with community pike-2 14:48:50 #info pike-1.5 on May.2, pike-2 on Jun.9 14:49:20 #info if features which are not able to catch the May.2, then can be included in Jun.9 14:49:30 thank you for the planning discussion 14:49:49 #topic open discussion 14:50:00 other topics? 14:50:12 no for me 14:50:21 no from me 14:50:26 no for me 14:50:30 no for me 14:50:32 well, the UT for all the commands of the client are there 14:50:37 ready for reviews 14:51:02 yes, I saw patches, will review tomorrow 14:51:19 once they're merged, we can proceed with releasing a stable version of and integrate it with devstack 14:51:30 everyone is encouraged to do review 14:51:50 cool, electrocucaracha 14:52:08 ok, and I can use it in my test 14:52:25 do not want to use curl anymore 14:52:31 good idea 14:52:43 the more we use it, the better it'll be 14:52:53 :) 14:53:17 and don't hesitate to report bug if you encounter it 14:53:30 me too 14:53:34 : ) 14:53:52 ok, thank you for attending the meeting 14:54:00 #endmeeting