01:01:26 #startmeeting tricircle 01:01:27 Meeting started Wed Aug 2 01:01:26 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is joehuang. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 01:01:28 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 01:01:30 The meeting name has been set to 'tricircle' 01:01:35 hello 01:01:35 hello 01:01:44 #topic rollcall 01:01:56 #info joehuang 01:02:00 #info zhiyuan 01:02:00 #info ronghui 01:02:02 #info dongfeng 01:02:03 #info Yipei 01:03:37 #topic PTL nomination 01:03:47 hello, the PTL nomination is open 01:03:51 #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-August/120383.html 01:04:28 as I had announced in the weekly meeting and mail-list, I won't plan to run PTL for next cycle 01:04:46 we need more diversity of the community 01:05:08 so I hope that someone else can step up and lead the community 01:05:57 I would like to have a try :) 01:06:28 thank you zhiyuan, and please follow the guide in the above link 01:06:37 all of you can have a try :) 01:07:03 please be aware of the nomination deadline 01:07:28 ok 01:07:46 except the file submitted to the repository, it's a tradition to send the self-nomination announcement to the mail-list 01:08:09 and prepare for the challenge 01:09:15 next topic, pike-rc 01:09:19 go zhiyuan ! 01:09:27 #topic pike-rc 01:10:11 to dims, we have submitted the patch for tricircle 3.4.0 release 01:10:39 could you help review the release patch, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/488904/ 01:10:49 thank you very much 01:11:05 joehuang : ack 01:11:13 thank you! dims 01:11:49 what about the stable/pike branch? is it created automatically? 01:11:58 after 3.4.0 release is tagged successfully, we can start to do regression test for all features landed in pike 01:12:03 or we need another patch later? 01:12:27 don't understand your question, zhiyuan 01:12:59 stable/pike for tricircle will not be created now 01:13:26 i am asking when the stable/pike branch will be created 01:13:39 after regression test passed, we'll have 3.5.0 release on Aug.22 and with stable/pike branching 01:14:04 i see 01:14:50 so for now, we have arrive at the point of feature freeze 01:15:36 and any feature wish to land in pike from now need to ask for RFE(request for exception) 01:16:09 usually no feature will be allowed to be merged, only bug fix is allowed, for stability purpose 01:17:03 but feature development can keep going, and once stable/pike is created, the window for new feature will be openned 01:17:23 any comment 01:17:31 how about adding pagination for job in tricircleclient ? I planned to add it to tricircleclient before aug 22 01:18:17 you can send one RFE in mail-list 01:18:26 ok, got it 01:18:38 but tricircleclient has been released 01:19:06 so pagination support for job will be available in next release 01:19:27 tricircleclient has been created with stable/pike. 01:19:56 the community schedule is to freeze client feature on milestone-3 01:20:21 one second 01:21:03 it's no RFE needed for tricircleclient, because the stable/pike has just been created on Monday by ttx 01:21:31 I saw the your talk about tricircleclient, so finally tricircleclient got released? 01:21:52 https://releases.openstack.org/pike/schedule.html#p-final-clientlib 01:21:53 yes 01:22:13 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/488903/ 01:22:47 that's fine. 01:23:08 Jul 24 - Jul 28 R-5 Pike-3 milestone Feature freeze Final release for client libraries 01:24:13 question on the plan? 01:26:01 Aug. 1 to Aug .22 is time for regressing test ? 01:26:07 regression test. 01:26:41 yes 01:27:26 got it. 01:27:36 though most of features are covered by smoke test, it's encouraged to add more test cases to the smoke test 01:28:00 and do manually test as far as possible 01:28:14 yes, like test for trunk, I only define the tests for trunk create/delete 01:28:23 once you find some bug, fix it and add new test cases to cover the case 01:28:37 need to test add/delete subport 01:29:25 and test cases enhancement will be reviewed and approved quickly 01:30:47 #topic feature development 01:31:05 hello, is there something to share for feature development? 01:32:49 For the QoS, has not passed the gate-tricircle-dsvm-multiregion-ubuntu-xenial-nv. Could you give us some help 01:32:55 adding instances from different subnet via neutron-lbaas api is ongoing, hopefully it can be delivered in next release 01:36:38 to ronghui, you are still struggling on the configuration loading problem? 01:37:00 yes 01:37:47 and try some method but still failure 01:41:09 ok, will take some time to look at it 01:41:28 thank you so much 01:41:33 I think we need to submit a patch to make the gate-tricircle-dsvm-multiregion-ubuntu-xenial-nv as voting job 01:42:19 currently this job is non-voting job, so verified ok doesn't mean it pass all test 01:42:44 gate-tricircle-dsvm-multiregion-ubuntu-xenial-nv is much more stable, so we can turn it into voting job 01:43:21 agree with it 01:44:30 #action make gate-tricircle-dsvm-multiregion-ubuntu-xenial-nv being voting job 01:44:42 #open discussion 01:44:46 other topic? 01:44:50 no 01:44:52 no 01:44:57 no 01:45:22 what about adding coverage test at the same time? 01:45:33 it's also non-voting job 01:45:39 good proposal 01:45:55 #action convert coverage test as voting job too 01:46:13 good 01:46:54 then It's more difficult to commit codes. I remember I change the coverage rate when coverage test fails in tricircleclient. 01:46:58 I found that meher from orange has succeeded in installation of two node tricircle 01:47:46 to dongfeng, yes, so you need to add test for your newly-added code 01:47:48 coverage is to guarantee the code being tested as far as possible 01:48:37 :), yes, I willl 01:49:30 next weekly meeting, we may begin to prepare the next cycle, so how about talk about the PTG for next cycle 01:50:28 that's fine. 01:50:42 ok 01:50:47 and our weekly meeting time slot is not friendly for European contributor, it's also a good topic 01:51:12 I am sure Meher is based in France. 01:51:53 other topic 01:51:59 ? 01:52:01 no for me 01:52:06 no for me 01:52:14 no for me 01:52:22 no for me 01:52:37 ok, let's end the meeting 01:52:42 #endmeeting