08:07:06 <marios> #startmeeting tripleo
08:07:07 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Oct  1 08:07:06 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is marios. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
08:07:08 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
08:07:10 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'tripleo'
08:07:13 <lsmola> marios: :-)
08:07:24 <lsmola> marios: thank you
08:07:26 <marios> so, as no one else seems to be willing, i can do the copy/paste
08:07:43 <marios> #topic agenda
08:07:43 <marios> * bugs
08:07:43 <marios> * reviews
08:07:43 <marios> * Projects needing releases
08:07:43 <marios> * CD Cloud status
08:07:45 <marios> * CI
08:07:48 <marios> * Tuskar
08:07:50 <marios> * Specs
08:07:53 <marios> * open discussion
08:08:00 <marios> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TripleO
08:08:39 <marios> #topic bugs
08:08:50 <marios> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/
08:08:50 <marios> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/diskimage-builder/
08:08:50 <marios> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/os-refresh-config
08:08:50 <marios> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/os-apply-config
08:08:50 <marios> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/os-collect-config
08:08:52 <marios> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/os-cloud-config
08:08:55 <marios> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/tuskar
08:08:57 <marios> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-tuskarclient
08:09:23 <marios> 4 criticals in tripleo
08:10:25 <marios> anyone have any updates or a fav bug they want to highlight here?
08:11:16 <marios> so this one +bug/1263294 was discussed last week too
08:11:31 <marios> was previously assigned to mkerrin, but apparently he can't work on it any longer
08:11:47 <marios> so it's up for grabs if someone has the time and inclination
08:13:00 <marios> OK. if there's nothing else here, we can move on...
08:13:22 <marios> #topic reviews
08:13:37 <marios> #info There's a new dashboard linked from https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TripleO#Review_team - look for "TripleO Inbox Dashboard"
08:13:40 <marios> #link http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-openreviews.html
08:13:43 <marios> #link http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-reviewers-30.txt
08:13:46 <marios> #link http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-reviewers-90.txt
08:14:17 <marios> Stats since the last revision without -1 or -2 :
08:14:24 <marios> Average wait time: 11 days, 18 hours, 48 minutes 1st quartile wait time: 0 days, 19 hours, 24 minutes Median wait time: 7 days, 16 hours, 32 minutes 3rd quartile wait time: 14 days, 21 hours, 6 minutes
08:14:38 <marios> oh that didn't work so well
08:14:52 <marios> so the one we usually point to is
08:14:54 <marios> 3rd quartile wait time: 14 days, 21 hours, 6 minutes
08:15:07 <marios> for reference, last week it was
08:15:09 <marios> 19:11:09 <lifeless> 3rd quartile wait time: 12 days, 17 hours, 27 minutes
08:15:24 <marios> so a *bit* worse
08:16:32 <marios> anyone want to request reviews or other discussion here?
08:16:46 <marios> what happened to the 'auto -1' discussion on the mailing list?
08:16:47 * marios looks
08:17:03 <marios> wow what a terrific audience
08:17:09 <lsmola> :-)
08:17:50 <marios> ok am going to move on in a minute if there's nothing else here
08:17:56 <lxsli> +1
08:17:59 <d0ugal> +1
08:18:05 <tchaypo> last week we also looked at the queue growth on the botttom of the 30 day stats
08:18:10 <marios> i guess the obligatory 'cores please keep up your review obligations'
08:18:38 <tchaypo> it say sthe queue is down 7 reviews over the last 30 days..
08:18:45 <tchaypo> which is the right direction..
08:19:01 <tchaypo> did i mention my internet being not great at the omment?
08:19:14 <marios> tchaypo: lifeless was going to file a bug about a miscount too, but I missed the meeting and don't follow exactly what that was
08:19:47 <tchaypo> ah, i can try to talk to him about that later this week, if we're both around at the same time
08:20:07 <marios> tchaypo: for clarity, which one is the 'queue growth over the last 30 days' i can't immediately see it @ http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-openreviews.html
08:20:31 <tchaypo> it's on the bottom of the 30-day stats page
08:21:24 <marios> anyone have any ideas how to progress with the auto -1 - i haven't followed the discussion for a couple days
08:21:29 <marios> i think consensus was:
08:21:44 <tchaypo> www.nemebean.com/reviewstats/tripleo-30.txt -  Queue growth in the last 30 days: -7 (-0.2/day)
08:21:45 <marios> it is a good idea, but there is still discussion about 'auto' vs 'human' -1
08:21:52 <marios> tchaypo: thanks
08:22:12 <marios> #note   Queue growth in the last 30 days: -7 (-0.2/day)
08:22:47 <tchaypo> i think there's also discussion about whether -1 is useful or just stats-twiddling
08:23:02 <marios> tchaypo: right.
08:23:26 <tchaypo> if we can find another way to increase visibility of active changes i think we'd get consensus around taht easier
08:23:33 <lxsli> last I heard it was to be a workflow -1 which gets it out of the core reviewer queue
08:23:49 <lxsli> that is useful beyond making stats more accurate
08:24:19 <tchaypo> but not everyone can workflow -1
08:24:33 <marios> so, regardless of the discussion, how do we get something like this passed? apparently irc votes are not binding/useful (cos of timezones?). how do we put a proposal to vote then?
08:25:32 <marios> ok, really moving on if there is nothing else here ...
08:25:45 <tchaypo> but i guess that's what we want - workflow-1 means a core has reviewd it and judged it not ready to land
08:26:18 <lsmola> tchaypo: sounds reasonable
08:26:49 <tchaypo> sorry, my internet is really bad.
08:26:51 <marios> OK
08:26:56 <marios> tchaypo: thanks for your input mate
08:27:11 <marios> i guess we leave it until we have a new ptl and they can pick it up next week
08:27:20 <marios> we can't do anything here anyway
08:27:28 <marios> moving on
08:27:35 <marios> #topic Projects needing releases
08:27:50 <marios> all those wanting to do a release please form an orderly queue
08:28:06 * marios pokerface
08:28:09 <lsmola> hehe
08:28:19 <lsmola> I guess it's time I learn how to do it
08:28:32 <marios> lsmola: thanks!
08:28:40 <marios> lsmola: do you have the necessary permissions?
08:28:40 <StevenK> lsmola: Are you in the -ptl group on gerrit?
08:29:03 <marios> I *think* I can add you if you are not (anyone already in that group can)
08:29:06 <lsmola> StevenK: no idea :-)
08:29:23 <marios> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TripleO/ReleaseManagement
08:29:57 <marios> OK. so here's what we'll do. If I can add lsmola to the tripleo-ptl group after this meeting, then he will do the release.
08:30:05 <marios> otherwise, i will do it, and lsmola can do it next week
08:30:22 <marios> #note lsmola to release all the things
08:30:43 <lsmola> marios: ok, I agree with any of those options :-)
08:30:48 <marios> thanks lsmola - it's pretty self explanatory but I am very willing to help if there are any issues
08:30:59 <lsmola> marios: ok
08:31:09 <marios> moving on...
08:31:20 <marios> #topic CD Cloud status
08:31:32 <marios> anyone around with an update here?
08:31:41 <derekh> rh1 is ok
08:31:43 <derekh> I ment to push up a patch to start using hp1 last week, had to rebuild and redploy testenv image again, with updated bash and 3G VM's, that done now and I'ge ran 35 CI tests using it (32 passed), so I'll submit the patch to infra today.
08:32:06 <marios> great.
08:32:40 <marios> moving on in a minute if theres nothing else
08:32:49 <tchaypo> Hp2 is on a go-slow as I'm on holiday
08:33:16 <marios> OK thanks derekh and tchaypo
08:33:19 <marios> #topic CI
08:33:29 <derekh> 3 ci incidents causing test to fail since the last meeting, details here https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-ci-breakages
08:34:11 <derekh> I've also stared emailing a weekly report to the list so people know how things are going
08:34:12 <marios> #note derekh> 3 ci incidents causing test to fail since the last meeting details https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-ci-breakages
08:34:21 <marios> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-ci-breakages
08:34:40 <derekh> *started
08:35:27 <derekh> thats all from me for CI
08:35:32 <marios> thanks derekh
08:35:44 <marios> moving on in if there's nothing else
08:36:16 * marios moves on in
08:36:20 <marios> #topic Tuskar
08:36:32 <marios> lotsa tuskar ppl about
08:36:41 <d0ugal> Tuskar is finished ;)
08:36:45 <marios> \o/
08:37:04 <marios> anything worth mentioning here?
08:37:22 <marios> OK
08:37:24 <d0ugal> I don't think so - we have a demo video is anyone wants to see what Tuskar can do now
08:37:29 * d0ugal find the link
08:37:35 <marios> thanks dougshelley66
08:37:41 <marios> d0ugal even
08:37:51 <d0ugal> #link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--WWdJXmf8o
08:38:02 <marios> thanks!
08:38:35 <marios> #topic Specs
08:38:38 <d0ugal> ^ Useful for anyone not following Tuskar too close but wants to see the current state
08:39:38 <marios> anything someone wants to bring up
08:40:03 <marios> OK
08:40:05 <marios> moving on
08:40:19 <marios> #topic open discussion
08:40:51 <marios> so james polley has emailed the list about summit planning
08:40:56 <marios> lemme get a link
08:41:20 <tchaypo> #link http://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-tripleo-summit-topics
08:41:26 <marios> thanks!
08:41:42 <tchaypo> Thanks for bringing it up :)
08:41:51 <marios> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Summit/Planning
08:42:06 <marios> oh sorry, that one is probably not so useful
08:42:25 <marios> OK. anything else someone wants to bring up?
08:42:36 <marios> otherwise, we get an extra 15 mins for reviews \o/
08:42:57 <marios> going
08:43:03 <marios> going
08:43:13 <marios> #endmeeting